Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
61
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Interlinked Sister Chromosomes Arise in the Absence of Condensin during Fast Replication in B. subtilis

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Condensin—an SMC-kleisin complex—is essential for efficient segregation of sister chromatids in eukaryotes [ 1–4]. In Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, deletion of condensin subunits results in severe growth phenotypes and the accumulation of cells lacking nucleoids [ 5, 6]. In many other bacteria and under slow growth conditions, however, the reported phenotypes are much milder or virtually absent [ 7–10]. This raises the question of what role prokaryotic condensin might play during chromosome segregation under various growth conditions. In B. subtilis and Streptococcus pneumoniae, condensin complexes are enriched on the circular chromosome near the single origin of replication by ParB proteins bound to parS sequences [ 11, 12]. Using conditional alleles of condensin in B. subtilis, we demonstrate that depletion of its activity results in an immediate and severe defect in the partitioning of replication origins. Multiple copies of the chromosome remain unsegregated at or near the origin of replication. Surprisingly, the growth and chromosome segregation defects in rich medium are suppressed by a reduction of replication fork velocity but not by partial inhibition of translation or transcription. Prokaryotic condensin likely prevents the formation of sister DNA interconnections at the replication fork or promotes their resolution behind the fork.

          Highlights

          • Smc-ScpAB inactivation causes a severe chromosome segregation defect in B. subtilis

          • Replication origins remain interconnected in the absence of prokaryotic condensin

          • Defects in chromosome segregation are highly dependent on growth conditions

          • Reduction of replication fork velocity rescues segregation of replication origins

          Abstract

          Gruber et al. show that conditional inactivation of prokaryotic condensin in B. subtilis results in immediate and severe defects in chromosome segregation under conditions promoting fast growth. The separation of replication origins is blocked in the absence of Smc-ScpAB but can be rescued by artificial reduction of replication fork speed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Chromosome replication and the division cycle of Escherichia coli B/r.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A heterodimeric coiled-coil protein required for mitotic chromosome condensation in vitro.

            We report here a chromosomal protein that plays an essential role in mitotic chromosome condensation in Xenopus egg extracts. Two polypeptides, designated XCAP-C and XCAP-E, were found to associate with each other in the extracts, presumably forming a heterodimer. During chromosome assembly in mitotic extracts, XCAP-C/E was recruited to the chromatin and formed a discrete internal structure within assembled chromosomes. Antibody blocking experiments showed that XCAP-C function is required for both assembly and structural maintenance of mitotic chromosomes in vitro. Deduced amino acid sequences revealed that the two polypeptides share common structural motifs, consisting of an N-terminal NTP-binding domain, two central coiled-coil regions, and a C-terminal conserved domain. These motifs are highly conserved in a protein family, members of which have been identified recently in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Condensin I stabilizes chromosomes mechanically through a dynamic interaction in live cells.

              Restructuring chromatin into morphologically distinct chromosomes is essential for cell division, but the molecular mechanisms underlying this process are poorly understood. Condensin complexes have been proposed as key factors, although controversial conclusions about their contribution to chromosome structure were reached by different experimental approaches in fixed cells or cell extracts. Their function under physiological conditions still needs to be defined. Here, we investigated the specific functions of condensin I and II in live cells by fluorescence microscopy and RNAi depletion. Photobleaching and quantitative time-lapse imaging showed that GFP-tagged condensin II bound stably to chromosomes throughout mitosis. By contrast, the canonical condensin I interacted dynamically with chromatin after completion of prophase compaction, reaching steady-state levels on chromosomes before congression. In condensin I-depleted cells, compaction was normal, but chromosomes were mechanically labile and unable to withstand spindle forces during alignment. However, normal levels of condensin II were not required for chromosome stability. We conclude that while condensin I seems dispensable for normal chromosome compaction, its dynamic binding after nuclear envelope breakdown locks already condensed chromatin in a rigid state required for mechanically stable spindle attachment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Curr Biol
                Curr. Biol
                Current Biology
                Cell Press
                0960-9822
                1879-0445
                03 February 2014
                03 February 2014
                : 24
                : 3
                : 293-298
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Research Group “Chromosome Organization and Dynamics,” Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
                [2 ]Molecular Genetics Group, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, Centre for Synthetic Biology, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Biology I, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Großhaderner Str. 2-4, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
                [4 ]Centre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author sgruber@ 123456biochem.mpg.de
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author jeff.errington@ 123456newcastle.ac.uk
                [5]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Article
                S0960-9822(13)01608-4
                10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.049
                3919155
                24440399
                e96196ef-9ca7-4256-a1f7-5b7b5586227e
                © 2014 ELL & Excerpta Medica.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 1 October 2013
                : 28 November 2013
                : 17 December 2013
                Categories
                Report

                Life sciences
                Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article