3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Fistula First Initiative: Historical Impact on Vascular Access Practice Patterns and Influence on Future Vascular Access Care

      Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="P1">The vascular access is the lifeline for the hemodialysis patient. In the United States, the Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative (FFBI) has been influential in improving use of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) in prevalent hemodialysis patients. Currently, prevalent AVF rates are near the goal of 66% set forth by the original FFBI. However, central venous catheter (CVC) rates remain very high in the United States in patients initiating hemodialysis, nearly exceeding 80%. A new direction of the of the FFBI has focused on strategies to reduce CVC use, and subsequently the FFBI has now been renamed the “Fistula First-Catheter Last Initiative”. However, an AVF may not be the best vascular access in all hemodialysis patients, and arteriovenous grafts (AVG) and central venous catheters (CVC) may be appropriate and the best access for a subset of hemodialysis patients. Unfortunately, there still remains very little emphasis within vascular access initiatives and guidelines directed towards evaluation of the individual patient context, specifically patients with poor long-term prognoses and short life expectancies, patients with multiple comorbidities, patients who are more likely to die than reach end stage renal disease (ESRD), and patients of elderly age with impaired physical and cognitive function. Given the complexity of medical and social issues in advanced CKD and ESRD patients, planning, selection, and placement of the most appropriate vascular access are ideally managed within a multidisciplinary setting and requires consideration of several factors including national vascular access guidelines. Thus, the evolution of the FFBI should underscore the need for multidisciplinary health teams with a major emphasis placed on “the right access for the right patient” and improving the patient’s overall quality of life. </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology
          Cardiovasc Eng Tech
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1869-408X
          1869-4098
          September 2017
          July 10 2017
          September 2017
          : 8
          : 3
          : 244-254
          Article
          10.1007/s13239-017-0319-9
          5693683
          28695442
          e98de521-cb71-4989-b156-c4a3b1e258e1
          © 2017

          http://www.springer.com/tdm

          http://www.springer.com/tdm

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article