Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Social injury: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the attitudes towards suicide of lay persons in Ghana

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          One way of furthering our understanding of suicidal behaviour is to examine people's attitudes towards it and how they conceive the act. The aim of this study was to understand how lay persons conceive the impact of suicide on others and how that influences their attitudes towards suicide; and discuss the implications for suicide prevention in Ghana. This is a qualitative study, using a semi-structured interview guide to investigate the attitudes and views of 27 lay persons from urban and rural settings in Ghana. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was used to analyse the data. Findings showed that the perceived breach of interrelatedness between people due to suicidal behaviour influenced the informants’ view of suicide as representing a social injury. Such view of suicide influenced the negative attitudes the informants expressed towards the act. The negative attitudes towards suicide in Ghana are cast in consequential terms. Thus, suicide is an immoral act because it socially affects others negatively. The sense of community within the African ethos and The Moral Causal Ontology for Suffering are theoretical postulations that are used to offer some explanations of the findings in this study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          African religions and philosophy

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Validity in qualitative research.

              Much contemporary dialogue has centered on the difficulty of establishing validity criteria in qualitative research. Developing validity standards in qualitative research is challenging because of the necessity to incorporate rigor and subjectivity as well as creativity into the scientific process. This article explores the extant issues related to the science and art of qualitative research and proposes a synthesis of contemporary viewpoints. A distinction between primary and secondary validity criteria in qualitative research is made with credibility, authenticity, criticality, and integrity identified as primary validity criteria and explicitness, vividness, creativity, thoroughness, congruence, and sensitivity identified as secondary validity criteria.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Lecturer
                Role: Professor
                Role: Senior Lecturer
                Role: Professor
                Journal
                Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being
                QHW
                International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being
                CoAction Publishing
                1748-2623
                1748-2631
                04 November 2011
                2011
                : 6
                : 4
                : 10.3402/qhw.v6i4.8708
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, University of Ghana, Ghana.
                [2 ]Department of Social Work and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
                [3 ]Department of Suicide Research and Prevention, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
                [4 ]Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Joseph Osafo, Department of Psychology, University of Ghana, Ghana. E-mail: joseph.osafo@ 123456samfun.ntnu.no
                Article
                QHW-6-8708
                10.3402/qhw.v6i4.8708
                3209819
                22065981
                eafb5fcf-b947-4f26-846b-c7fb775cfe6d
                © 2011 J. Osafo et al.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 October 2011
                Categories
                Empirical Studies

                Health & Social care
                lay persons,attitudes,ghana,suicide,social injury
                Health & Social care
                lay persons, attitudes, ghana, suicide, social injury

                Comments

                Comment on this article