Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Answer changing in multiple choice assessment change that answer when in doubt – and spread the word!

      research-article
      1 , , 1 , 1
      BMC Medical Education
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Several studies during the last decades have shown that answer changing in multiple choice examinations is generally beneficial for examinees. In spite of this the common misbelief still prevails that answer changing in multiple choice examinations results in an increased number of wrong answers rather than an improved score. One suggested consequence of newer studies is that examinees should be informed about this misbelief in the hope that this prejudice might be eradicated. This study aims to confirm data from previous studies about the benefits of answer changing as well as pursue the question of whether students informed about the said advantageous effects of answer changing would indeed follow this advice and change significantly more answers. Furthermore a look is cast on how the overall examination performance and mean point increase of these students is affected.

          Methods

          The answer sheets to the end of term exams of 79 3 rd year medical students at the University of Munich were analysed to confirm the benefits of answer changing. Students taking the test were randomized into two groups. Prior to taking the test 41 students were informed about the benefits of changing answers after careful reconsideration while 38 students did not receive such information. Both groups were instructed to mark all answer changes made during the test.

          Results

          Answer changes were predominantly from wrong to right in full accordance with existing literature resources. It was shown that students who had been informed about the benefits of answer changing when in doubt changed answers significantly more often than students who had not been informed. Though students instructed on the benefits of changing answers scored higher in their exams than those not instructed, the difference in point increase was not significant.

          Conclusion

          Students should be informed about the benefits of changing initial answers to multiple choice questions once when in reasonable doubt about these answers. Furthermore, reconsidering answers should be encouraged as students will heed the advice and change more answers than students not so instructed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Staying with Initial Answers on Objective Tests: Is it a Myth?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Attitudes, Behaviors, and Reasons for Changing Responses Following Answer-Changing Instruction

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              It Pays to Switch? Consequences of Changing Answers on Multiple-Choice Examinations

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Medical Education
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6920
                2007
                24 August 2007
                : 7
                : 28
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Schwerpunkt Medizindidaktik, Medizinische Klinik Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, Ziemssenstraße 1, 80336 Munich, Germany
                Article
                1472-6920-7-28
                10.1186/1472-6920-7-28
                2020461
                17718902
                eb709f37-455a-4ece-ad57-dd458350926d
                Copyright © 2007 Bauer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 5 April 2007
                : 24 August 2007
                Categories
                Research Article

                Education
                Education

                Comments

                Comment on this article