1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: humoral response, safety, and effects on disease activity

      research-article
      1 , , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 1
      Clinical Rheumatology
      Springer International Publishing
      COVID-19, Immunogenicity, Safety, SARS-CoV-2, Sjögren’s syndrome, Vaccine

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          There is no study specifically focused on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS).

          Objectives

          To assess the immunogenicity, safety, possible effects on disease activity, and autoantibody profile of the Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine in pSS.

          Methods

          Fifty-one pSS patients and 102 sex- and age-balanced controls without autoimmune diseases were included in a prospective phase 4 trial of the Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine (two doses 28 days apart, D0/D28). Participants were assessed in three face-to-face visits (D0/D28 and six weeks after the 2nd dose (D69)) regarding adverse effects; clinical EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index (clinESSDAI); anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (seroconversion (SC) and geometric mean titers (GMT)); neutralizing antibodies (NAb); and pSS autoantibody profile.

          Results

          Patients and controls had comparable female sex frequency (98.0% vs. 98.0%, p = 1.000) and mean age (53.5 ± 11.7 vs. 53.4 ± 11.4 years, p = 0.924), respectively. On D69, pSS patients presented moderate SC (67.5% vs. 93.0%, p < 0.001) and GMT (22.5 (95% CI 14.6–34.5) vs. 59.6 (95% CI 51.1–69.4) AU/mL, p < 0.001) of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG but lower than controls, and also, moderate NAb frequency (52.5% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.021) but lower than controls. Median neutralizing activity on D69 was comparable in pSS (58.6% (IQR 43.7–63.6)) and controls (64% (IQR 46.4–81.1)) ( p = 0.219). Adverse events were mild. clinESSDAI and anti-Ro(SS-A)/anti-La(SS-B) levels were stable throughout the study ( p > 0.05).

          Conclusion

          Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine is safe in pSS, without a deleterious impact on disease activity, and has a moderate short-term humoral response, though lower than controls. Thus, a booster dose needs to be studied in these patients.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04754698.

          Key Points

          Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine is safe in pSS, without a detrimental effect on systemic disease activity, and has a moderate short-term humoral response

          A booster dose should be considered in these patients

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection

            Predictive models of immune protection from COVID-19 are urgently needed to identify correlates of protection to assist in the future deployment of vaccines. To address this, we analyzed the relationship between in vitro neutralization levels and the observed protection from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection using data from seven current vaccines and from convalescent cohorts. We estimated the neutralization level for 50% protection against detectable SARS-CoV-2 infection to be 20.2% of the mean convalescent level (95% confidence interval (CI) = 14.4-28.4%). The estimated neutralization level required for 50% protection from severe infection was significantly lower (3% of the mean convalescent level; 95% CI = 0.7-13%, P = 0.0004). Modeling of the decay of the neutralization titer over the first 250 d after immunization predicts that a significant loss in protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection will occur, although protection from severe disease should be largely retained. Neutralization titers against some SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern are reduced compared with the vaccine strain, and our model predicts the relationship between neutralization and efficacy against viral variants. Here, we show that neutralization level is highly predictive of immune protection, and provide an evidence-based model of SARS-CoV-2 immune protection that will assist in developing vaccine strategies to control the future trajectory of the pandemic.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group.

              C Vitali (2002)
              Classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome (SS) were developed and validated between 1989 and 1996 by the European Study Group on Classification Criteria for SS, and broadly accepted. These have been re-examined by consensus group members, who have introduced some modifications, more clearly defined the rules for classifying patients with primary or secondary SS, and provided more precise exclusion criteria.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sandra.pasoto@hc.fm.usp.br
                Journal
                Clin Rheumatol
                Clin Rheumatol
                Clinical Rheumatology
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0770-3198
                1434-9949
                19 March 2022
                : 1-11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.11899.38, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0722, Rheumatology Division, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, , Universidade de São Paulo, ; Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455, 3º andar, sala 3190, Sao Paulo, SP 01246-903 Brazil
                [2 ]GRID grid.11899.38, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0722, Central Laboratory Division, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, , Universidade de Sao Paulo, ; Sao Paulo, SP Brazil
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-6804
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3756-0928
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7440-6212
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7168-5906
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8801-405X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9720-0719
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9250-6508
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8827-1360
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8382-1119
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5926-3388
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6575-1628
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4277-3821
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-3317
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0009-1013
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0155-0162
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7585-4348
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0520-4681
                Article
                6134
                10.1007/s10067-022-06134-x
                8934123
                35306594
                eb9599b6-0803-4c09-bb67-c06f42e7d628
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) 2022

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 4 October 2021
                : 9 March 2022
                : 14 March 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001807, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo;
                Award ID: 2015/03756-4
                Award ID: 2019/17272-0
                Award ID: 2017/14352-7
                Award ID: 2018/09937-9
                Award ID: 2020/09367-8
                Award ID: 2020/11677-5
                Award ID: 2021/08455-3
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003593, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico;
                Award ID: 305242/2019-9
                Award ID: 304984/2020-5
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Bolsa de Valores do Brasil (B3)
                Categories
                Original Article

                Rheumatology
                covid-19,immunogenicity,safety,sars-cov-2,sjögren’s syndrome,vaccine
                Rheumatology
                covid-19, immunogenicity, safety, sars-cov-2, sjögren’s syndrome, vaccine

                Comments

                Comment on this article