Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Anatomical Alterations in Plant Tissues Induced by Plant-Parasitic Nematodes

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) interact with plants in different ways, for example, through subtle feeding behavior, migrating destructively through infected tissues, or acting as virus-vectors for nepoviruses. They are all obligate biotrophic parasites as they derive their nutrients from living cells which they modify using pharyngeal gland secretions prior to food ingestion. Some of them can also shield themselves against plant defenses to sustain a relatively long lasting interaction while feeding. This paper is centered on cell types or organs that are newly induced in plants during PPN parasitism, including recent approaches to their study based on molecular biology combined with cell biology-histopathology. This issue has already been reviewed extensively for major PPNs (i.e., root-knot or cyst nematodes), but not for other genera (viz. Nacobbus aberrans, Rotylenchulus spp.). PPNs have evolved with plants and this co-evolution process has allowed the induction of new types of plant cells necessary for their parasitism. There are four basic types of feeding cells: (i) non-hypertrophied nurse cells; (ii) single giant cells; (iii) syncytia; and (iv) coenocytes. Variations in the structure of these cells within each group are also present between some genera depending on the nematode species viz. Meloidogyne or Rotylenchulus. This variability of feeding sites may be related in some way to PPN life style (migratory ectoparasites, sedentary ectoparasites, migratory ecto-endoparasites, migratory endoparasites, or sedentary endoparasites). Apart from their co-evolution with plants, the response of plant cells and roots are closely related to feeding behavior, the anatomy of the nematode (mainly stylet size, which could reach different types of cells in the plant), and the secretory fluids produced in the pharyngeal glands. These secretory fluids are injected through the stylet into perforated cells where they modify plant cytoplasm prior to food removal. Some species do not produce specialized feeding sites (viz. Ditylenchus, Subanguina), but may develop a specialized modification of the root system (e.g., unspecialized root galls or a profusion of roots). This review introduces new data on cell types and plant organs stimulated by PPNs using sources varying from traditional histopathology to new holistic methodologies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references144

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Top 10 plant-parasitic nematodes in molecular plant pathology.

          The aim of this review was to undertake a survey of researchers working with plant-parasitic nematodes in order to determine a 'top 10' list of these pathogens based on scientific and economic importance. Any such list will not be definitive as economic importance will vary depending on the region of the world in which a researcher is based. However, care was taken to include researchers from as many parts of the world as possible when carrying out the survey. The top 10 list emerging from the survey is composed of: (1) root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.); (2) cyst nematodes (Heterodera and Globodera spp.); (3) root lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus spp.); (4) the burrowing nematode Radopholus similis; (5) Ditylenchus dipsaci; (6) the pine wilt nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus; (7) the reniform nematode Rotylenchulus reniformis; (8) Xiphinema index (the only virus vector nematode to make the list); (9) Nacobbus aberrans; and (10) Aphelenchoides besseyi. The biology of each nematode (or nematode group) is reviewed briefly. © 2013 BSPP AND JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Plant Pathology

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Brassinosteroids Regulate Root Growth, Development, and Symbiosis.

              Brassinosteroids (BRs) are natural plant hormones critical for growth and development. BR deficient or signaling mutants show significantly shortened root phenotypes. However, for a long time, it was thought that these phenotypes were solely caused by reduced cell elongation in the mutant roots. Functions of BRs in regulating root development have been largely neglected. Nonetheless, recent detailed analyses, revealed that BRs are not only involved in root cell elongation but are also involved in many aspects of root development, such as maintenance of meristem size, root hair formation, lateral root initiation, gravitropic response, mycorrhiza formation, and nodulation in legume species. In this review, current findings on the functions of BRs in mediating root growth, development, and symbiosis are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                16 November 2017
                2017
                : 8
                : 1987
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Crop Protection, Institute for Sustainable Agriculture (CSIC) , Córdoba, Spain
                [2] 2Plant Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Group, University of Castilla La Mancha , Toledo, Spain
                [3] 3A. P. S. Polyxena , Bari, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Brigitte Mauch-Mani, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland

                Reviewed by: Verónica Cabrera, National University of Cordoba, Argentina; Vojislava Grbic, University of Western Ontario, Canada

                *Correspondence: Juan E. Palomares-Rius palomaresje@ 123456ias.csic.es orcid.org/0000-0003-1776-8131

                This article was submitted to Plant Microbe Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2017.01987
                5697168
                29201038
                ec8b6980-c439-4519-939e-92148b105600
                Copyright © 2017 Palomares-Rius, Escobar, Cabrera, Vovlas and Castillo.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 19 June 2017
                : 03 November 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 150, Pages: 16, Words: 12792
                Funding
                Funded by: Consejería de Economía, Innovación, Ciencia y Empleo, Junta de Andalucía 10.13039/501100002878
                Award ID: P12-AGR 1486
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Review

                Plant science & Botany
                ditylenchus,heterodera,giant cell,globodera,meloidogyne,rotylenchulus,syncytium,xiphinema

                Comments

                Comment on this article