14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Does home based medication review keep older people out of hospital? The HOMER randomised controlled trial.

      BMJ : British Medical Journal
      Aftercare, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude of Health Personnel, Drug Utilization Review, statistics & numerical data, Emergency Treatment, utilization, England, Family Practice, Home Care Services, House Calls, Humans, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Readmission, Pharmacies, Pharmacists, Prognosis, Quality of Life, Self Administration

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To determine whether home based medication review by pharmacists affects hospital readmission rates among older people. Randomised controlled trial. Home based medication review after discharge from acute or community hospitals in Norfolk and Suffolk. 872 patients aged over 80 recruited during an emergency admission (any cause) if returning to own home or warden controlled accommodation and taking two or more drugs daily on discharge. Two home visits by a pharmacist within two weeks and eight weeks of discharge to educate patients and carers about their drugs, remove out of date drugs, inform general practitioners of drug reactions or interactions, and inform the local pharmacist if a compliance aid is needed. Control arm received usual care. Total emergency readmissions to hospital at six months. Secondary outcomes included death and quality of life measured with the EQ-5D. By six months 178 readmissions had occurred in the control group and 234 in the intervention group (rate ratio = 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.58; P = 0.009, Poisson model). 49 deaths occurred in the intervention group compared with 63 in the control group (hazard ratio = 0.75, 0.52 to 1.10; P = 0.14). EQ-5D scores decreased (worsened) by a mean of 0.14 in the control group and 0.13 in the intervention group (difference = 0.01, -0.05 to 0.06; P = 0.84, t test). The intervention was associated with a significantly higher rate of hospital admissions and did not significantly improve quality of life or reduce deaths. Further research is needed to explain this counterintuitive finding and to identify more effective methods of medication review.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article