57
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Role of neuraxial drug delivery in cancer pain therapy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Opioids have long been the mainstay of cancer pain treatment and have been used without any consideration for their effect on cancer growth and long-term prognosis. There is now growing evidence that the continued use of opioids for this indication should be reviewed and even reconsidered. Although current evidence and literature covering this subject is mixed and does not yet allow for a clear determination to be made about safety, there is enough data to support the search for new treatment paradigms, beginning with anesthesia for oncologic surgery and management of cancer pain over the disease course.

          Lay abstract

          Cancer pain has long been treated with a class of medications called opioids. This class includes medications such as morphine, oxycodone and dilaudid. The safety of this group of medications for cancer pain treatment has not been proven and there is growing evidence that the management of cancer pain should be changed. Even different types of anesthesia used for surgery can have an effect on survival rates years later. The impact of these medications seems to be suppression of the immune system; thus, allowing cancers to proliferate even faster.

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

          Cancer pain has a severe impact on quality of life and is associated with numerous psychosocial responses. Recent studies suggest that treatment of cancer pain has improved during the last decade.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis?

            Regional anesthesia is known to prevent or attenuate the surgical stress response; therefore, inhibiting surgical stress by paravertebral anesthesia might attenuate perioperative factors that enhance tumor growth and spread. The authors hypothesized that breast cancer patients undergoing surgery with paravertebral anesthesia and analgesia combined with general anesthesia have a lower incidence of cancer recurrence or metastases than patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia and patient-controlled morphine analgesia. In this retrospective study, the authors examined the medical records of 129 consecutive patients undergoing mastectomy and axillary clearance for breast cancer between September 2001 and December 2002. Fifty patients had surgery with paravertebral anesthesia and analgesia combined with general anesthesia, and 79 patients had general anesthesia combined with postoperative morphine analgesia. The follow-up time was 32 +/- 5 months (mean +/- SD). There were no significant differences in patients or surgical details, tumor presentation, or prognostic factors. Recurrence- and metastasis-free survival was 94% (95% confidence interval, 87-100%) and 82% (74-91%) at 24 months and 94% (87-100%) and 77% (68-87%) at 36 months in the paravertebral and general anesthesia patients, respectively (P = 0.012). This retrospective analysis suggests that paravertebral anesthesia and analgesia for breast cancer surgery reduces the risk of recurrence or metastasis during the initial years of follow-up. Prospective trials evaluating the effects of regional analgesia and morphine sparing on cancer recurrence seem warranted.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years.

              Despite the abundant literature on this topic, accurate prevalence estimates of pain in cancer patients are not available. We investigated the prevalence of pain in cancer patients according to the different disease stages and types of cancer. A systematic review of the literature was conducted. An instrument especially designed for judging prevalence studies on their methodological quality was used. Methodologically acceptable articles were used in the meta-analyses. Fifty-two studies were used in the meta-analysis. Pooled prevalence rates of pain were calculated for four subgroups: (i) studies including patients after curative treatment, 33% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21% to 46%]; (ii) studies including patients under anticancer treatment: 59% (CI 44% to 73%); (iii) studies including patients characterised as advanced/metastatic/terminal disease, 64% (CI 58% to 69%) and (iii) studies including patients at all disease stages, 53% (CI 43% to 63%). Of the patients with pain more than one-third graded their pain as moderate or severe. Pooled prevalence of pain was >50% in all cancer types with the highest prevalence in head/neck cancer patients (70%; 95% CI 51% to 88%). Despite the clear World Health Organisation recommendations, cancer pain still is a major problem.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                FDD
                Future Drug Discovery
                Future Drug. Discov.
                Future Drug Discovery
                Newlands Press Ltd (London, UK )
                2631-3316
                21 August 2020
                October 2020
                : 2
                : 4
                : FDD49
                Affiliations
                1Department of Anesthesia Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women’s Health & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                2Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92037, USA
                3Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
                4Department of Pharmacology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Author for correspondence: elross@ 123456bwh.harvard.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2195-5872
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4508-5135
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7094-3096
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8838-9070
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4297-536X
                Article
                10.4155/fdd-2019-0024
                eceddde3-4e9b-4a64-82e3-00b5bbe5b649
                © 2020 Ashish Bhandari

                This work is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Unported License

                History
                : 24 July 2020
                : 24 July 2020
                : 21 August 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Categories
                Perspective

                Biochemistry,Molecular medicine,Pharmaceutical chemistry,Bioinformatics & Computational biology,Biotechnology,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                cancer pain opioids,cancer mortality,cancer pain considerations,cancer pain opioids treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article