23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A multi-institution consensus on how to perform EUS-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction

      other
      , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 16 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ,
      Endoscopic Ultrasound
      Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
      Consensus, EUS-guided biliary drainage, questionnaire survey

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Objectives:

          EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) was shown to be useful for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). However, there is lack of consensus on how EUS-BD should be performed.

          Methods:

          This was a worldwide multi-institutional survey among members of the International Society of EUS conducted in February 2018. The survey consisted of 10 questions related to the practice of EUS-BD.

          Results:

          Forty-six endoscopists of them completed the survey. The majority of endoscopists felt that EUS-BD could replace percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage after failure of ERCP. Among all EUS-BD methods, the rendezvous stenting technique should be the First choice. Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) were recommended by most endoscopists. For EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS), superiority of partially-covered SEMS over fully-covered SEMS was not in agreement. 6-Fr cystotomes were recommended for fistula creation. During the HGS approach, longer SEMS (8 or 10 cm) was recommended. During the choledochoduodenostomy approach, 6-cm SEMS was recommended. During the intrahepatic (IH) approach, the IH segment 3 was recommended.

          Conclusion:

          This is the first worldwide survey on the practice of EUS-BD for MBO. There were wide variations in practice, and randomized studies are urgently needed to establish the best approach for the management of this condition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bilioduodenal anastomosis: a new technique for biliary drainage.

          Endoscopic biliary stenting is the most common method of treating obstructive jaundice. We present a new technique of biliary drainage using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided puncture of the common bile duct (CBD). A 56-year-old man with obstructive jaundice was referred for EUS and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) because a computed tomography (CT) scan had shown a pancreatic mass in the head of the pancreas and a dilated CBD. The patient was enrolled in a preoperative chemoradiotherapy protocol and biliary stenting was required. Deep cannulation was not obtained even after a precut and the procedure was stopped. Using a therapeutic EUS scope (FG 38X Pentax), the CBD was punctured with a 5-F needle-knife under EUS guidance and a cholangiogram was obtained. A 0.35-inch guide wire was introduced into the CBD. The EUS scope was removed and a duodenoscope was introduced, allowing the placement through the duodenum of a 10-F plastic stent. The CBD was drained properly. No complication occurred.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

            EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is increasingly used as an alternate therapeutic modality to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for biliary obstruction in patients who fail ERCP. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of these 2 procedures.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessment of efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review.

              EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has emerged as an alternative procedure after failed ERCP. However, limited data on the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD are available. Therefore, a systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD and to evaluate transduodenal (TD) and transgastric (TG) approaches.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Endosc Ultrasound
                Endosc Ultrasound
                EUS
                Endoscopic Ultrasound
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                2303-9027
                2226-7190
                Nov-Dec 2018
                06 December 2018
                : 7
                : 6
                : 356-365
                Affiliations
                [1]Endoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
                [1 ]Pathology Unit (Flora Poizat), Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
                [2 ]Center Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
                [3 ]Department of Endoscopy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Craiova, Romania
                [4 ]Medical Department II, Caritas Hospital, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
                [5 ]Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
                [6 ]Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
                [7 ]Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
                [8 ]Department of Gastroenterology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
                [9 ]Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
                [10 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan
                [11 ]Surgical Clinical Gastroenterolgy, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia
                [12 ]Gastroenterologist at Queen's NRI Hospital, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
                [13 ]Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg, Wriezen, Germany
                [14 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
                [15 ]Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
                [16 ]Division of Endoscopy, Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark
                [17 ]Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
                [18 ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Adventist Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
                [19 ]Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [20 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
                [21 ]Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
                [22 ]Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
                [23 ]Internal Medicine Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
                [24 ]Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
                [25 ]Endoscopy Unit, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
                [26 ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
                [27 ]Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
                [28 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
                [29 ]Department of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
                [30 ]Trocadero Clinic, Paris, France
                [31 ]Clinica Reina Sofia, Bogota, Colombia
                [32 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Jaswant Rai Specialty Hospital, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
                [33 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University East Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
                [34 ]Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
                [35 ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, Australia
                [36 ]Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
                [37 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
                [38 ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
                [39 ]Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
                [40 ]Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA
                [41 ]Section of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
                [42 ]Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
                [43 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
                [44 ]2 nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
                [45 ]Division of Gastroenterology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
                [46 ]Department of Gastroenterology, SL Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Dr. Siyu Sun, Endoscopy Center, ShengJing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36, Sanhao Street, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China. E-mail: sunsy@ 123456sj-hospital.org ; sun-siyu@ 123456163.com
                Article
                EUS-7-356
                10.4103/eus.eus_53_18
                6289007
                30531022
                ed1fc715-5519-4362-b126-ce9d3953c5d0
                Copyright: © 2018 Spring Media Publishing Co. Ltd

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 17 September 2018
                : 25 October 2018
                Categories
                Consensus

                consensus,eus-guided biliary drainage,questionnaire survey

                Comments

                Comment on this article