3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      EUS-guided pancreatic drainage: A steep learning curve

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Objective:

          EUS-guided pancreatic drainage (EUS-PD) is an efficacious, acceptable risk option for patients with pancreatic duct obstruction who fail conventional ERCP. The aim of this study was to define the learning curve (LC) for EUS-PD.

          Methods:

          Consecutive patients undergoing EUS-PD by a single operator were included from a dedicated registry. Demographics, procedural info, adverse events, and follow-up data were collected. Nonlinear regression and cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses were conducted for the LC.

          Results:

          Fifty-six patients were included (54% of male, with a mean age of 58 years). Technical success was achieved in 47 patients (84%). Stent placement was antegrade in 36 patients (77%) and retrograde in 11 (23%). Clinical success was achieved in 46/47 (98%) patients who achieved technical success. Adverse events were seen in 13 patients (6 of whom did not achieve technical success) and included bleeding requiring embolization ( n = 5), bleeding treated with clips peri-procedurally ( n = 1), pancreatitis ( n = 5), and a pancreatic fluid collection drained via EUS-drainage ( n = 2). The median procedural time was 80 min (range 49–159 min). The CUSUM chart showed that 80-min procedural time was achieved at the 27 th procedure. Durations further reduced 40 th procedure onward, reaching a plateau indicating proficiency (nonlinear regression P < 0.0001).

          Conclusion:

          Endoscopists experienced in EUS-PD are expected to achieve a reduction in procedural time over successive cases, with efficiency reached at 80 min and a learning rate of 27 cases. Continued improvement is demonstrated with additional experience, with plateau indicating mastery suggested at the 40 th case. EUS-PD is probably one of the hardest therapeutic endosonographic procedures to learn.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          EUS-guided rendezvous drainage of obstructed biliary and pancreatic ducts: Report of 6 cases.

          Only a few cases have been reported of EUS-guided drainage of obstructed pancreatic or bile ducts. An initial experience with EUS-guided rendezvous drainage after unsuccessful ERCP is reported. EUS-guided transgastric or transduodenal needle puncture and guidewire placement through obstructed pancreatic (n=4) or bile (n=2) ducts was attempted in 6 patients. Efforts were made to advance the guidewire antegrade across the papilla or surgical anastomosis. If guidewire passage was successful, rendezvous ERCP with stent placement was performed immediately afterward. EUS-guided duct access and intraductal guidewire placement was accomplished in 5 of 6 cases, with successful traversal of the obstruction, and rendezvous ERCP, with stent placement in 3 of 6 cases (two biliary, one pancreatic). The procedure was clinically effective in all successful cases (two patients with malignant obstructive jaundice, one with relapsing pancreatitis after pancreaticoduodenectomy). There was one minor complication (transient fever) but no pancreatitis or duct leak after successful or unsuccessful procedures. EUS is a feasible technique for allowing rendezvous drainage of obstructed biliary or pancreatic ducts through native papillae or anastomoses after initially unsuccessful ERCP.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Quantitative and individualized assessment of the learning curve using LC-CUSUM.

            Current methods available for assessing the learning curve, such as a predefined number of procedures or direct observation by a tutor, are unsatisfactory. A new tool, the cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM), has been developed that allows quantitative and individual assessment of the learning curve. Some 532 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) performed by one endoscopist over 8 years were analysed retrospectively using LC-CUSUM to assess the learning curve. The procedure was new to the endoscopist and monitored prospectively in the initial study. Success of the procedure was defined as cannulation and proper visualization of the duct(s) selected before the examination. Fifty ERCPs were considered unsuccessful. There was a gradual improvement in performance over time from a success rate of 82.0 per cent for the first 100 procedures to 96.1 per cent for the last 129 procedures. The LC-CUSUM signalled at the 79th procedure, indicating that sufficient evidence had accumulated to prove that the endoscopist was competent. LC-CUSUM allows quantitative monitoring of individual performance during the learning process. (c) 2008 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Single-operator, single-session EUS-guided anterograde cholangiopancreatography in failed ERCP or inaccessible papilla.

              ERCP may be challenging or may fail in certain situations, including postsurgical anatomy, periampullary diverticula, ampullary tumor invasion, and high-grade strictures. To report a large experience with EUS-guided anterograde cholangiopancreatography (EACP) to facilitate ductal access or perform direct EUS-guided therapy in patients with postsurgical anatomy or failed ERCP. Retrospective cohort study. Tertiary referral center. Ninety-five consecutive patients with failed ERCP or inaccessible papilla over a 4-year period. EACP techniques involved ductal puncture and ductography, followed by either guidewire advancement for rendezvous ERCP in patients with duodenoscope accessible papilla or direct drainage in altered anatomy. For failures, crossover to the alternate EACP technique was performed when appropriate. Technical success rates and complications. EACP procedures were attempted in 95 of 2566 ERCP procedures (3.7%). EUS-guided cholangiography (n = 70) and pancreatography (n = 25) were successful in 97% and 100%, respectively. EUS-guided rendezvous ERCP was successful in 75% of biliary procedures and in 56% of pancreatic procedures. Direct EUS-guided therapy was successful in 86% and 75% of biliary and pancreatic procedures, respectively. Direct interventions included pancreaticogastrostomy (n = 10), anterograde stent across stricture (n = 10), hepaticogastrostomy (n = 8), and choledochoduodenostomy (n = 1). Ten complications (10.5%) related to EACP or subsequent rendezvous ERCP included pancreatitis (n = 5), hematoma (n = 1), bile leak (n = 1), bacteremia (n = 1), pneumoperitoneum (n = 1), and perforation (n = 1). Single-center experience; retrospective study. EACP complements ERCP and allows successful pancreaticobiliary therapy in a large proportion of patients with failed ERCP or difficult-to-access papilla. Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Endosc Ultrasound
                Endosc Ultrasound
                EUS
                Endoscopic Ultrasound
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                2303-9027
                2226-7190
                May-Jun 2020
                13 June 2020
                : 9
                : 3
                : 175-179
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
                [2 ]Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
                [3 ]UAB Multispecialty Clinic, Montgomery, AL, USA
                [4 ]Thomas Jefferson Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
                [5 ]Hospital University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Dr. Michel Kahaleh, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, 1 RWJ Place, MEB 464, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. E-mail: mkahaleh@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                EUS-9-175
                10.4103/eus.eus_3_20
                7430898
                32584312
                bd53f281-a804-4d4a-a412-59df84dcfe33
                Copyright: © 2020 SPRING MEDIA PUBLISHING CO. LTD

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 05 August 2019
                : 08 February 2020
                Categories
                Original Article

                eus-guided pancreatic drainage,pancreatic stricture,pancreaticogastrostomy,pancreatico-jejunostomy,therapeutic eus

                Comments

                Comment on this article