9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Practitioner Review: Definition, recognition, and treatment challenges of irritability in young people

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references98

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Emotion dysregulation in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

          Although it has long been recognized that many individuals with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) also have difficulties with emotion regulation, no consensus has been reached on how to conceptualize this clinically challenging domain. The authors examine the current literature using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Three key findings emerge. First, emotion dysregulation is prevalent in ADHD throughout the lifespan and is a major contributor to impairment. Second, emotion dysregulation in ADHD may arise from deficits in orienting toward, recognizing, and/or allocating attention to emotional stimuli; these deficits implicate dysfunction within a striato-amygdalo-medial prefrontal cortical network. Third, while current treatments for ADHD often also ameliorate emotion dysregulation, a focus on this combination of symptoms reframes clinical questions and could stimulate novel therapeutic approaches. The authors then consider three models to explain the overlap between emotion dysregulation and ADHD: emotion dysregulation and ADHD are correlated but distinct dimensions; emotion dysregulation is a core diagnostic feature of ADHD; and the combination constitutes a nosological entity distinct from both ADHD and emotion dysregulation alone. The differing predictions from each model can guide research on the much-neglected population of patients with ADHD and emotion dysregulation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear.

            M Fanselow (1994)
            This paper applies the behavior systems approach to fear and defensive behavior, examining the neural circuitry controlling fear and defensive behavior from this vantage point. The defensive behavior system is viewed as having three modes that are activated by different levels of fear. Low levels of fear promote pre-encounter defenses, such as meal-pattern reorganization. Moderate levels of fear activate post-encounter defenses. For the rat, freezing is the dominant post-encounter defensive response. Since this mode of defense is activated by learned fear, forebrain structures such as the amygdala play a critical role in its organization. Projections from the amygdala to the ventral periaqueductal gray activate freezing. Extremely high levels of fear, such as those provoked by physical contact, elicit the vigorous active defenses that compose the circa-strike mode. Midbrain structures such as the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray and the superior colliculus play a crucial role in organizing this mode of defense. Inhibitory interactions between the structures mediating circa-strike and post-encounter defense allow for the rapid switching between defensive modes as the threatening situation varies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Common disorders are quantitative traits.

              After drifting apart for 100 years, the two worlds of genetics - quantitative genetics and molecular genetics - are finally coming together in genome-wide association (GWA) research, which shows that the heritability of complex traits and common disorders is due to multiple genes of small effect size. We highlight a polygenic framework, supported by recent GWA research, in which qualitative disorders can be interpreted simply as being the extremes of quantitative dimensions. Research that focuses on quantitative traits - including the low and high ends of normal distributions - could have far-reaching implications for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of the problematic extremes of these traits.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
                J Child Psychol Psychiatr
                Wiley
                00219630
                July 2018
                July 2018
                October 30 2017
                : 59
                : 7
                : 721-739
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Mood Brain and Development Unit; Emotion and Development Branch; National Institute of Mental Health; National Institutes of Health; Department of Health and Human Services; Bethesda MD USA
                [2 ]Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; King's College London; London UK
                [3 ]Section on Mood Dysregulation and Neuroscience; Emotion and Development Branch; National Institute of Mental Health; National Institutes of Health; Department of Health and Human Services; Bethesda MD USA
                Article
                10.1111/jcpp.12823
                29083031
                ee6a43c0-adc7-4716-8745-d94f33fc5602
                © 2017

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article