18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Differences in Obesity Prevalence by Demographics and Urbanization in US Children and Adolescents, 2013-2016

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1052260e183">IMPORTANCE</h5> <p id="P8">Differences in childhood obesity by demographics and urbanization have been reported.</p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1052260e188">OBJECTIVE</h5> <p id="P9">To present data on obesity and severe obesity among US youth by demographics and urbanization and to investigate trends by urbanization. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1052260e193">DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS</h5> <p id="P10">Measured weight and height among youth aged 2 to 19 years in the 2001–2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, which are serial, cross-sectional, nationally representative surveys of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1052260e198">EXPOSURES</h5> <p id="P11">Sex, age, race and Hispanic origin, education of household head, and urbanization, as assessed by metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs; large: ≥ 1 million population). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1052260e203">MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES</h5> <p id="P12">Prevalence of obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥95th percentile of US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] growth charts) and severe obesity (BMI ≥120% of 95th percentile) by subgroups in 2013–2016 and trends by urbanization between 2001–2004 and 2013–2016. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1052260e208">RESULTS</h5> <p id="P13">Complete data on weight, height, and urbanization were available for 6863 children and adolescents (mean age, 11 years; female, 49%). In 2013–2016, the prevalence among youth aged 2 to 19 years was 17.8% (95% CI, 16.1%−19.6%) for obesity and 5.8% (95% CI, 4.8%−6.9%) for severe obesity. Prevalence of obesity in large MSAs (171% [95% CI, 14.9%−19.5%]), medium or small MSAs (17.2% [95% CI, 14.5%−20.2%]) and non-MSAs (21.7% [95% CI, 16.1%−28.1%]) were not significantly different from each other (range of pairwise comparisons <i>P</i> = .09–.96). Severe obesity was significantly higher in non-MSAs (9.4% [95% CI, 5.7%−14.4%]) compared with large MSAs (5.1% [95% CI, 4.1%−6.2%]; <i>P</i> = .02). In adjusted analyses, obesity and severe obesity significantly increased with greater age and lower education of household head, and severe obesity increased with lower level of urbanization. Compared with non-Hispanic white youth, obesity and severe obesity prevalence were significantly higher among non-Hispanic black and Hispanic youth. Severe obesity, but not obesity, was significantly lower among non-Hispanic Asian youth than among non-Hispanic white youth. There were no significant linear or quadratic trends in obesity or severe obesity prevalence from 2001–2004 to 2013–2016 for any urbanization category ( <i>P</i> range = .07–.83). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d1052260e222">CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE</h5> <p id="P14">In 2013–2016, there were differences in the prevalence of obesity and severe obesity by age, race and Hispanic origin, and household education, and severe obesity was inversely associated with urbanization. Demographics were not related to the urbanization findings. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Severe obesity in children and adolescents: identification, associated health risks, and treatment approaches: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

          Severe obesity afflicts between 4% and 6% of all youth in the United States, and the prevalence is increasing. Despite the serious immediate and long-term cardiovascular, metabolic, and other health consequences of severe pediatric obesity, current treatments are limited in effectiveness and lack widespread availability. Lifestyle modification/behavior-based treatment interventions in youth with severe obesity have demonstrated modest improvement in body mass index status, but participants have generally remained severely obese and often regained weight after the conclusion of the treatment programs. The role of medical management is minimal, because only 1 medication is currently approved for the treatment of obesity in adolescents. Bariatric surgery has generally been effective in reducing body mass index and improving cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors; however, reports of long-term outcomes are few, many youth with severe obesity do not qualify for surgery, and access is limited by lack of insurance coverage. To begin to address these challenges, the purposes of this scientific statement are to (1) provide justification for and recommend a standardized definition of severe obesity in children and adolescents; (2) raise awareness of this serious and growing problem by summarizing the current literature in this area in terms of the epidemiology and trends, associated health risks (immediate and long-term), and challenges and shortcomings of currently available treatment options; and (3) highlight areas in need of future research. Innovative behavior-based treatment, minimally invasive procedures, and medications currently under development all need to be evaluated for their efficacy and safety in this group of patients with high medical and psychosocial risks.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            High body mass index for age among US children and adolescents, 2003-2006.

            The prevalence of overweight among US children and adolescents increased between 1980 and 2004. To estimate the prevalence of 3 measures of high body mass index (BMI) for age (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) and to examine recent trends for US children and adolescents using national data with measured heights and weights. Height and weight measurements were obtained from 8165 children and adolescents as part of the 2003-2004 and 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), nationally representative surveys of the US civilian, noninstitutionalized population. Prevalence of BMI for age at or above the 97th percentile, at or above the 95th percentile, and at or above the 85th percentile of the 2000 sex-specific Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) BMI-for-age growth charts among US children by age, sex, and racial/ethnic group. Because no statistically significant differences in the prevalence of high BMI for age were found between estimates for 2003-2004 and 2005-2006, data for the 4 years were combined to provide more stable estimates for the most recent time period. Overall, in 2003-2006, 11.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.7%-12.9%) of children and adolescents aged 2 through 19 years were at or above the 97th percentile of the 2000 BMI-for-age growth charts, 16.3% (95% CI, 14.5%-18.1%) were at or above the 95th percentile, and 31.9% (95% CI, 29.4%-34.4%) were at or above the 85th percentile. Prevalence estimates varied by age and by racial/ethnic group. Analyses of the trends in high BMI for age showed no statistically significant trend over the 4 time periods (1999-2000, 2001-2002, 2003-2004, and 2005-2006) for either boys or girls (P values between .07 and .41). The prevalence of high BMI for age among children and adolescents showed no significant changes between 2003-2004 and 2005-2006 and no significant trends between 1999 and 2006.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Prevalence of Obesity Among Youths by Household Income and Education Level of Head of Household — United States 2011–2014

              Obesity prevalence varies by income and education level, although patterns might differ among adults and youths ( 1 – 3 ). Previous analyses of national data showed that the prevalence of childhood obesity by income and education of household head varied across race/Hispanic origin groups ( 4 ). CDC analyzed 2011–2014 data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to obtain estimates of childhood obesity prevalence by household income (≤130%, >130% to ≤350%, and >350% of the federal poverty level [FPL]) and head of household education level (high school graduate or less, some college, and college graduate). During 2011–2014 the prevalence of obesity among U.S. youths (persons aged 2–19 years) was 17.0%, and was lower in the highest income group (10.9%) than in the other groups (19.9% and 18.9%) and also lower in the highest education group (9.6%) than in the other groups (18.3% and 21.6%). Continued progress is needed to reduce disparities, a goal of Healthy People 2020. The overall Healthy People 2020 target for childhood obesity prevalence is 130% to ≤350%, and >350% of FPL. The cut-off point for participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program is 130% of FPL, and 350% provides relatively equal sample sizes for each income group. Education was defined using education level of head of household and was categorized as a high school graduate or less, some college, and college graduate. All estimates accounted for the complex survey design including examination sample weights. Confidence intervals for estimates were constructed using the Korn and Graubard method ( 7 ). Differences between groups were tested using a 2-sided univariate t statistic (p 130% to ≤350% 1,974 19.9 (16.8–23.3) 18.0 (12.6–24.6) 19.9 (15.5–25.0) 8.9 (4.9–14.6) 23.7 (19.4–28.5) >350% 1,256 10.9 (8.0–14.4)*,† 11.0 (7.3–15.7) 19.8 (12.2–29.4) 4.4 (1.9–8.4)*,§ 11.8 (7.5–17.4)*,† Females ≤130% 1,539 19.7 (17.4–22.1) 17.8 (13.3–23.1) 19.9 (15.7–24.6) 8.4 (2.6–19.1)¶ 22.5 (18.9–26.3) >130% to ≤350% 969 21.5 (16.9–26.8) 21.2 (13.0–31.6) 21.6 (16.3–27.6) 8.2 (2.4–19.0)¶ 22.7 (17.0–29.2) >350% 613 8.0 (5.0–12.0)*,† 7.2 (3.5–12.8)*,† 21.1 (9.6–37.2) 1.3 (0.1–4.8)¶ 13.8 (6.3–25.2) Males ≤130% 1,592 18.1 (15.5–21.0) 13.5 (9.2–18.7) 19.0 (15.7–22.6) 18.0 (10.1–28.6) 23.1 (18.0–28.9) >130% to ≤350% 1,005 18.4 (15.6–21.4) 15.0 (10.0–21.2) 18.1 (12.1–25.5) 9.5 (3.9–18.7)§ 24.6 (20.0–29.7) >350% 643 13.7 (9.5–18.8) 14.7 (9.2–21.9) 18.7 (12.1–26.9) 7.6 (2.8–16.0)*,§ 10.0 (4.8–17.9)*,† Education level of head of household Total High school graduate or less 3,254 21.6 (20.0–23.3) 19.6 (16.2–23.3) 21.1 (17.5–25.0) 13.2 (8.5–19.3) 24.2 (20.9–27.7) Some college 1,936 18.3 (15.4–21.5)** 17.6 (12.4–23.9) 19.7 (16.3–23.4) 12.0 (6.0–20.7) 19.9 (16.2–23.9) College graduate 1,464 9.6 (7.3–12.5)**,†† 8.5 (5.8–12.1)**,†† 15.4 (9.8–22.5) 5.5 (3.1–8.9)** 13.5 (6.9–22.8)** Females High school graduate or less 1,583 22.7 (20.7–24.9) 22.5 (17.5–28.1) 21.0 (16.0–26.7) 9.2 (4.4–16.5) 23.9 (20.1–28.0) Some college 938 18.3 (14.6–22.6)** 18.0 (11.8–25.7) 22.1 (17.4–27.4) 8.0 (1.3–23.7)¶ 17.3 (12.5–23.0)** College graduate 739 8.5 (5.5–12.4)**,†† 7.5 (3.9–12.8)**,†† 16.3 (10.2–24.1) 3.3 (0.7–9.2)¶ 14.0 (6.8–24.3)** Males High school graduate or less 1,671 20.6 (18.1–23.2) 16.9 (11.6–23.3) 21.1 (17.5–25.1) 16.9 (9.0–27.7) 24.4 (20.5–28.7) Some college 998 18.3 (14.7–22.4) 17.3 (11.0–25.3) 17.2 (13.4–21.6) 14.6 (6.7–26.4) 22.3 (15.9–29.8) College graduate 725 10.7 (7.6–14.7)**,†† 9.6 (5.5–15.2)** 14.5 (6.9–25.4) 7.9 (3.8–14.0) 12.9 (5.8–23.9) §,** Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval. * Significantly different from ≤130% of FPL, p 130% to ≤350% of FPL, p 40%. ** Significantly different from high school graduate or less, p 130% to ≤350% of FPL. † Quadratic trend (p<0.05) for males ≤130% of FPL. The figure above is a line graph showing trends in obesity prevalence among youths (persons aged 2–19 years), by household income, in the United States, from 1999–2002 through 2011–2014. Obesity prevalence among youths increased from 1999–2002 to 2011–2014 among females and males in households headed by persons with the least education (high school graduate or less) and among females in households headed by persons with some college education. There were no other significant trends. In addition, the difference in childhood obesity prevalence between the lowest and highest head of household education groups increased over time for females but not for males (Figure 2). FIGURE 2 Trends* in prevalence of obesity among youths (persons aged 2–19 years), by education level of head of household — National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, United States, 1999–2002 through 2011–2014 * Linear trend (p<0.05) for females, high school graduate or less and some college, and males, high school graduate or less. The figure above is a line graph showing trends in prevalence of obesity among youths (persons aged 2–19 years), by education level of head of household, in the United States, from 1999–2002 through 2011–2014. Discussion During 2011–2014, the relationships between childhood obesity and income and childhood obesity and education of household head were complex, differing depending upon the subgroup of the population. The prevalence of obesity among youths living in households headed by college graduates was lower than that among those living in households headed by less educated persons for each race-Hispanic origin group. The same was not true for those living in the highest income group. Moreover, differences by income and education of household head are widening among females. Similar to results based on data from 2005 to 2008 ( 4 ), during 2011–2014 childhood obesity prevalence was lower among youths living in households in the highest income group. However, this was not the pattern seen in all subgroups. For example, obesity prevalence was lower in the highest income group compared with the other groups among non-Hispanic white females, but not among non-Hispanic black females, non-Hispanic white males, or non-Hispanic black males. Obesity prevalence decreased as head of household education increased in all subgroups examined. The prevalence of obesity was consistently lowest among children in households headed by college graduates, which differed from the pattern seen by income level. This difference in the relationship between obesity and income versus education has been observed in at least one other study ( 8 ). In addition, some relationships changed since 2005–2008. For example, there was a significant decreasing trend in obesity prevalence by income among non-Hispanic white males during 2005–2008 ( 4 ) but there were no differences during 2011–2014. This report also presents differences in childhood obesity prevalence by income and education among non-Hispanic Asian youths in the United States. It has been suggested that the cut-off point that typically defines obesity might underestimate associated health risks among Asian persons ( 9 ). The findings in this report are subject to at least one limitation. The sample size was small among some subgroups, such as non-Hispanic Asian females living in households with income above 350% of the FPL, where the prevalence of obesity is very low (1.3%) and the sample size is small (138). Additional years of data might provide more information about obesity prevalence by income, especially among non-Hispanic Asian youths. Trends in childhood obesity prevalence by income and education level of head of household indicate that disparities have existed at least since NHANES III, 1988–1994 ( 10 ). These differences have widened since 1999–2002 among females but not among males, where differences in obesity prevalence by income and education of the head of household have remained relatively constant from 1999–2002 to 2011–2014. These findings demonstrate that lower levels of income are not universally associated with childhood obesity. The association is complex and differs by sex, race, and Hispanic origin, and possibly over time. Differences by education are more consistent across subgroups than differences by income. More progress is needed to reduce disparities in childhood obesity prevalence, an important Healthy People 2020 objective. Summary What is already known about this topic? Studies have suggested that childhood obesity prevalence varies by income and education, although patterns might differ between adults and youths. What is added by this report? Analysis of data from the 2011–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) demonstrates that childhood obesity prevalence patterns among persons aged 2–19 years by household income are less consistent by race and Hispanic origin than are the patterns by level of education attained by the head of household. Moreover, the differences in childhood obesity prevalence by income and education of household head are widening among females while differences among males have remained relatively constant over time. What are the implications for public health practice? NHANES will continue to be an important source of data for monitoring disparities in childhood obesity. These data will help track the Healthy People 2020 objective of reducing disparities and might inform obesity prevention programs at the federal, state, and local levels.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA
                JAMA
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                0098-7484
                June 19 2018
                June 19 2018
                : 319
                : 23
                : 2410
                Affiliations
                [1 ]National Center for Health Statistics, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland
                [2 ]US Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland
                [3 ]National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
                Article
                10.1001/jama.2018.5158
                6393914
                29922826
                efc1c6d6-3b07-4ac8-85ce-8d8bbb6d5ef9
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article