17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit your manuscript, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exposure to Pesticides and Health Effects on Farm Owners and Workers From Conventional and Organic Agricultural Farms in Costa Rica: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study

      research-article
      , PhD 1 , , PhD 2 , 3 , , MSc 4 , 5 , , MSc 4 , 5 , , PhD 4 , 5 , , PhD 4 , 5 , , PhD 6 , , PhD 7 , , PhD 8 , , PhD 9 , , PhD 10 , , PhD 9 ,
      ,
      (Reviewer), (Reviewer), (Reviewer)
      JMIR Research Protocols
      JMIR Publications
      acetylcholinesterase, agriculture, Costa Rica, farm workers, near-infrared spectroscopy, neurobehavioral outcomes, pesticides, pesticide exposure assessment, respiratory outcomes

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Pesticide use is increasing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) including Costa Rica. This increase poses health risks to farm owners, farm workers, and communities living near agricultural farms.

          Objective

          We aimed to examine the health effects associated with occupational pesticide exposure in farm owners and workers from conventional and organic smallholder farms in Costa Rica.

          Methods

          We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 300 owners and workers from organic and conventional horticultural smallholder farms in Zarcero County, Costa Rica. During the baseline study visit, we administered a structured, tablet-based questionnaire to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, pesticide exposure, and health conditions (eg, respiratory and allergic outcomes and acute pesticide intoxication symptoms) and administered a neurobehavioral test battery (eg, Finger Tapping Test and Purdue Pegboard); we measured blood pressure, anthropometry (height, weight, and waist circumference), and erythrocytic acetylcholinesterase activity and also collected urine samples. In addition, a functional neuroimaging assessment using near-infrared spectroscopy was conducted with a subset of 50 study participants. During the follow-up study visit (~2-4 weeks after the baseline), we administered participants a short questionnaire on recent pesticide exposure and farming practices and collected hair, toenail, and urine samples. Urine samples will be analyzed for various pesticide metabolites, whereas toenails and hair will be analyzed for manganese (Mn), a biomarker of exposure to Mn-containing fungicides. Self-reported pesticide exposure data will be used to develop exposure intensity scores using an exposure algorithm. Furthermore, exposure-outcome associations will be examined using linear and logistic mixed-effects regression models.

          Results

          Fieldwork for our study was conducted between May 2016 and August 2016. In total, 113 farm owners and 187 workers from 9 organic and 83 conventional horticultural smallholder farms were enrolled. Data analyses are ongoing and expected to be published between 2019 and 2020.

          Conclusions

          This study is one of the first to examine differences in health effects due to pesticide exposure between farm owners and workers from organic and conventional smallholder farms in an LMIC. We expect that this study will provide critical data on farming practices, exposure pathways, and how occupational exposure to pesticides may affect farm owners and workers’ health. Finally, we hope that this study will allow us to identify strategies to reduce pesticide exposure in farm owners and workers and will potentially lay the groundwork for a future longitudinal study of health outcomes in farm owners and workers exposed to pesticides.

          International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

          DERR1-10.2196/10914

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Epidemiologic Evaluation of Measurement Data in the Presence of Detection Limits

          Quantitative measurements of environmental factors greatly improve the quality of epidemiologic studies but can pose challenges because of the presence of upper or lower detection limits or interfering compounds, which do not allow for precise measured values. We consider the regression of an environmental measurement (dependent variable) on several covariates (independent variables). Various strategies are commonly employed to impute values for interval-measured data, including assignment of one-half the detection limit to nondetected values or of “fill-in” values randomly selected from an appropriate distribution. On the basis of a limited simulation study, we found that the former approach can be biased unless the percentage of measurements below detection limits is small (5–10%). The fill-in approach generally produces unbiased parameter estimates but may produce biased variance estimates and thereby distort inference when 30% or more of the data are below detection limits. Truncated data methods (e.g., Tobit regression) and multiple imputation offer two unbiased approaches for analyzing measurement data with detection limits. If interest resides solely on regression parameters, then Tobit regression can be used. If individualized values for measurements below detection limits are needed for additional analysis, such as relative risk regression or graphical display, then multiple imputation produces unbiased estimates and nominal confidence intervals unless the proportion of missing data is extreme. We illustrate various approaches using measurements of pesticide residues in carpet dust in control subjects from a case–control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The European Community Respiratory Health Survey.

            The European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) was planned to answer specific questions about the distribution of asthma and health care given for asthma in the European Community. Specifically, the survey is designed to estimate variations in the prevalence of asthma, asthma-like symptoms and airway responsiveness; to estimate variations in exposures to known or suspected risk factors for asthma, and assess to what extent these variations explain the variations in the prevalence of disease; and to estimate differences in the use of medication for asthma. The protocol provides specific instructions on the sampling strategy adopted by the survey teams, as well as providing instructions on the use of questionnaires, the tests for allergy, lung function measurements, tests of airway responsiveness, and blood and urine collection. The principal data collection sheets and questionnaires are provided in the appendices, together with information on coding and quality control. The protocol is published as a reference for those who wish to know more of the methods used in the study, and also to give other groups who wish to collect comparable data access to the detailed methodology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Global Trends in the Use of Insecticides to Control Vector-Borne Diseases

              Background: Data on insecticide use for vector control are essential for guiding pesticide management systems on judicious and appropriate use, resistance management, and reduction of risks to human health and the environment. Objective: We studied the global use and trends of insecticide use for control of vector-borne diseases for the period 2000 through 2009. Methods: A survey was distributed to countries with vector control programs to request national data on vector control insecticide use, excluding the use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LNs). Data were received from 125 countries, representing 97% of the human populations of 143 targeted countries. Results: The main disease targeted with insecticides was malaria, followed by dengue, leishmaniasis, and Chagas disease. The use of vector control insecticides was dominated by organochlorines [i.e., DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)] in terms of quantity applied (71% of total) and by pyrethroids in terms of the surface or area covered (81% of total). Global use of DDT for vector control, most of which was in India alone, was fairly constant during 2000 through 2009. In Africa, pyrethroid use increased in countries that also achieved high coverage for LNs, and DDT increased sharply until 2008 but dropped in 2009. Conclusions: The global use of DDT has not changed substantially since the Stockholm Convention went into effect. The dominance of pyrethroid use has major implications because of the spread of insecticide resistance with the potential to reduce the efficacy of LNs. Managing insecticide resistance should be coordinated between disease-specific programs and sectors of public health and agriculture within the context of an integrated vector management approach.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Res Protoc
                JMIR Res Protoc
                ResProt
                JMIR Research Protocols
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1929-0748
                January 2019
                25 January 2019
                : 8
                : 1
                : e10914
                Affiliations
                [1 ] School of Public Health and Family Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa
                [2 ] Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute Basel Switzerland
                [3 ] University of Basel Basel Switzerland
                [4 ] Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag) Dübendorf Switzerland
                [5 ] Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics Department of Environmental Systems Science ETH Zürich Zürich Switzerland
                [6 ] Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Institute of Laboratory Medicine Lund University Lund Sweden
                [7 ] Laboratory of Toxicology Faculty of Pharmacy Federal University of Bahia Bahia Brazil
                [8 ] Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences School of Medicine Stanford University Stanford, CA United States
                [9 ] Central American Institute for Studies on Toxic Substances Universidad Nacional Heredia Costa Rica
                [10 ] Centro de Investigación y Diagnóstico en Salud y Deporte Universidad Nacional Heredia Costa Rica
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Ana M Mora ana.mora.mora@ 123456una.cr
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1861-1737
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7387-3863
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-1519
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5887-0960
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5888-6535
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2593-9957
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7435-9890
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3191-4484
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7295-6122
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0904-0204
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4187-3484
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2008-9714
                Article
                v8i1e10914
                10.2196/10914
                6367668
                30681969
                f00edfcc-dea9-4181-8369-3a17e5760f87
                ©Samuel Fuhrimann, Mirko S Winkler, Philipp Staudacher, Frederik T Weiss, Christian Stamm, Rik IL Eggen, Christian H Lindh, José A Menezes-Filho, Joseph M Baker, Fernando Ramírez-Muñoz, Randall Gutiérrez-Vargas, Ana M Mora. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 25.01.2019.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org.as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 30 April 2018
                : 3 August 2018
                : 30 August 2018
                : 10 October 2018
                Categories
                Protocol
                Protocol

                acetylcholinesterase,agriculture,costa rica,farm workers,near-infrared spectroscopy,neurobehavioral outcomes,pesticides,pesticide exposure assessment,respiratory outcomes

                Comments

                Comment on this article