7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Port-Site Implantation Diagnosed by Iodine-131 Post-Ablation Single-Photon Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography After Robotic Thyroidectomy: A Case Report

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Patient: Female, 37

          Final Diagnosis: Port-site implantation after robotic thyroidectomy

          Symptoms: None

          Medication: —

          Clinical Procedure: Iodine-131 post-ablation whole body scan and single photon emission tomography-computed tomography

          Specialty: Nuclear Medicine

          Objective:

          Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment

          Background:

          Robotic thyroidectomy using remote access approaches is currently regarded as the optimal surgical protocol for highly selected patients. This approach has excellent cosmetic outcomes compared with conventional open transcervical thyroidectomy. Although the remote access approach offers significant benefits, it can cause complications associated with the large working space required for surgery. Such complications can lead to unusual imaging findings.

          Case Report:

          We report a case of a 37-year-old woman with thyroid cancer who underwent robotic thyroidectomy and demonstrated unusual port-site implantation findings on post-treatment iodine-131 whole-body scintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography. Evaluation of stimulated thyroglobulin and additional imaging studies did not reveal any remarkable findings. Through a multidisciplinary discussion, we discovered that the bag had developed a tear during specimen retrieval. Our patient was administered a therapeutic dose of radioiodine, which accumulated within the target area and successfully ablated the implanted tissue. Follow-up imaging and biochemical studies were normal after a follow-up period of 7 years.

          Conclusions:

          Port-site seeding is a rare and unexpected surgical complication; however, it can be treated with radioiodine therapy involving a therapeutic dose. Meticulous surgical manipulation is essential to prevent port-site implantation related to spillage and tearing of thyroid or cancer tissue. Awareness and identification of these rare complications, which manifest as unusual imaging findings, are critical for improving the accuracy of interpretation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Gender is an age-specific effect modifier for papillary cancers of the thyroid gland.

          Thyroid cancer incidence rates have increased worldwide for decades, although more for papillary carcinomas than other types and more for females than males. There are few known thyroid cancer risk factors except female gender, and the reasons for the increasing incidence and gender differences are unknown. We used the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 9 Registries Database for cases diagnosed during 1976-2005 to develop etiological clues regarding gender-related differences in papillary thyroid cancer incidence. Standard descriptive epidemiology was supplemented with age-period-cohort (APC) models, simultaneously adjusted for age, calendar-period and birth-cohort effects. The papillary thyroid cancer incidence rate among females was 2.6 times that among males (9.2 versus 3.6 per 100,000 person-years, respectively), with a widening gender gap over time. Age-specific rates were higher among women than men across all age groups, and the female-to-male rate ratio declined quite consistently from more than five at ages 20-24 to 3.4 at ages 35-44 and approached one at ages 80+. APC models for papillary thyroid cancers confirmed statistically different age-specific effects among women and men (P < 0.001 for the null hypothesis of no difference by gender), adjusted for calendar-period and birth-cohort effects. Gender was an age-specific effect modifier for papillary thyroid cancer incidence. Future analytic studies attempting to identify the risk factors responsible for rising papillary thyroid cancer incidence should be designed with adequate power to assess this age-specific interaction among females and males.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Robotic and Endoscopic Thyroid Surgery: Evolution and Advances

            To minimize surgical morbidity and neck scarring, minimally invasive thyroidectomy and robotic/endoscopic thyroidectomy via cervical, axillary, anterior chest, breast, postauricular or transoral approaches have been developed over the past 20 years. In this article, we review the evolution of robotic and endoscopic thyroid surgery and recent advances. Among remote access approaches, the gasless transaxillary approach, bilateral axillo-breast approach, postauricular facelift approach, and transoral vestibular approach are in common use today. Each procedure has its own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, we need to understand these advantages and limitations, and to select the appropriate method for each patient. The most significant advantage of remote access thyroidectomy is its excellent cosmesis. The complication rate is similar in patients undergoing a remote access approach and those undergoing conventional surgery if the former is performed by experienced surgeons. Operative time is significantly longer in remote access thyroidectomy. In conclusion, remote access thyroidectomy is feasible and its outcomes are comparable to those of conventional transcervical thyroidectomy in highly selected patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tumor seeding following laparoscopy: international survey.

              The aim of the study was to determine if tumor seeding during laparoscopic surgery for cancer is a rare event or a typical complication of this procedure. Laparoscopic staging and treatment of intraabdominal tumors is increasing in gastroenterology, gynecology, and general surgery. A total of 1052 questionnaires were mailed to surgical department chairmen, members of the German Society of Surgery, Swiss Association for Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery, and Austrian Society of Minimal Invasive Surgery asking them to list their department's experience with tumor seeding after laparoscopy for nonapparent or known malignancy. There were 607 (57.7%) surgeons who reported a total of 117,840 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 409 incidental gallbladder carcinomas, and 412 laparoscopies on patients with colorectal carcinoma. Altogether 109 patients who developed tumor recurrence in connection with laparoscopic surgery have been reported. Port-site recurrence was identified in 70 of 409 patients (17.1%) with a median of 180 days following laparoscopic cholecystectomy for nonapparent gallbladder carcinoma. In 8 cases (11.5%) a protective plastic bag had been used for gallbladder retrieval. Six patients without port-site metastases were found to have a diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis a median of 120 days after cholecystectomy. Of 412 laparoscopies for colorectal cancer, 19 cases (4.6%) of tumor seeding have been reported, 16 of which (3.9%) had documented port-site and scar recurrences a median of 196 days after laparoscopy. The tumor specimen was intact, and a plastic bag was used for extraction in seven cases. In 14 patients trocar-site metastases have been reported a median of 70 days after laparoscopy for different nonapparent or known malignancies. The probability of developing abdominal wall metastasis is higher after laparoscopy for cancer than after open surgery. An intact surgical specimen and the use of a plastic retrieval bag do not exclude the risk of port-site recurrences. These facts and the early appearance of peritoneal carcinosis in a few cases of intraabdominal malignancies seem to confirm a specific laparoscopic risk for intraperitoneal tumor cell seeding and implantation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Am J Case Rep
                Am J Case Rep
                amjcaserep
                The American Journal of Case Reports
                International Scientific Literature, Inc.
                1941-5923
                2019
                18 November 2019
                : 20
                : 1695-1698
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
                [2 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
                [3 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
                Author notes

                Authors’ Contribution:

                [A]

                Study Design

                [B]

                Data Collection

                [C]

                Statistical Analysis

                [D]

                Data Interpretation

                [E]

                Manuscript Preparation

                [F]

                Literature Search

                [G]

                Funds Collection

                [*]

                Mi Ra Kim and Sunmi Jo contributed equally to this work

                Conflict of interest: None declared

                Corresponding Author: Hye-kyung Shim, e-mail: shimhk80@ 123456naver.com
                Article
                920451
                10.12659/AJCR.920451
                6878966
                31735909
                f07a552b-e381-4a3f-b1ca-55bafddea9ee
                © Am J Case Rep, 2019

                This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International ( CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

                History
                : 02 October 2019
                : 28 October 2019
                Categories
                Articles

                positron-emission tomography,thyroidectomy,tomography, emission-computed, single-photon,whole body imaging

                Comments

                Comment on this article