5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Identifying molecular phenotypes in sepsis: an analysis of two prospective observational cohorts and secondary analysis of two randomised controlled trials

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" class="first" dir="auto" id="d10459049e392">In sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), heterogeneity has contributed to difficulty identifying effective pharmacotherapies. In ARDS, two molecular phenotypes (hypoinflammatory and hyperinflammatory) have consistently been identified, with divergent outcomes and treatment responses. In this study, we sought to derive molecular phenotypes in critically ill adults with sepsis, determine their overlap with previous ARDS phenotypes, and evaluate whether they respond differently to treatment in completed sepsis trials. </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
          The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
          Elsevier BV
          22132600
          November 2023
          November 2023
          : 11
          : 11
          : 965-974
          Article
          10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00237-0
          37633303
          f1694109-532d-4b84-828c-092a0b68349e
          © 2023

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/

          https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-017

          https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037

          https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-012

          https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029

          https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-004

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article