165
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    3
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Do Cosmic Backgrounds Cyclical Renew by Matter and Quanta Emissions? The Origin of Backgrounds, Space Distributions and Cyclical Earth Phenomena by Two Phase Dynamics

      Preprint

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A numerical coincidence Dp of -0.000489 was found between the ratios of proton emission at 459-keV and cosmic background at 0.25-keV respect to proton and to electron proper energy respectively. Multiplying 459-keV and 0.25-keV by Dp, two more numerical coincidences were found with 0.1-keV background and 0.06-eV of neutrino energy, respectively. Global criticality phenomena plus c and G discontinued decreasing provoke small cyclical reorganization of particles and quanta originating background emissions every 30-Myr are propose. At the beginning of each cycle, gradually emissions from electrons lasting 0.1 Myr originate the 0.25-keV background and, a possible 459-keV background from proton emissions. At following cycle, the 459-keV quanta makes two emissions of 0.1-keV originating a diffuse background, and 0.25-keV quanta makes two of 0.06-eV originating the relic neutrinos. The Dp is a possible physical constant that characterize the threshold, which trigger cyclical phenomena at space and Earth every 30-Myr

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          2004-06-28
          2016-02-17
          Article
          physics/0406144
          f172c32b-89bc-4ce0-9533-0d637066175c

          http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

          History
          Custom metadata
          16 pages, 4 figures
          physics.gen-ph

          General physics
          General physics

          Comments

          Comment on this article