0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Development of a Surveillance Definition for United States–Mexico Binational Cases of Tuberculosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives:

          Consistently collected binational surveillance data are important in advocating for resources to manage and treat binational cases of tuberculosis (TB). The objective of this study was to develop a surveillance definition for binational (United States–Mexico) cases of TB to assess the burden on US TB program resources.

          Methods:

          We collaborated with state and local TB program staff members in the United States to identify characteristics associated with binational cases of TB. We collected data on all cases of TB from 9 pilot sites in 5 states (Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas) during January 1–June 30, 2014, that had at least 1 binational characteristic (eg, “crossed border while on TB treatment” and “received treatment in another country, coordinated by an established, US-funded, binational TB program”). A workgroup of US state, local, and federal partners reviewed results and used them to develop a practical surveillance definition.

          Results:

          The pilot sites reported 87 cases of TB with at least 1 binational characteristic during the project period. The workgroup drafted a proposed surveillance definition to include 2 binational characteristics: “crossed border while on TB treatment” (34 of 87 cases, 39%) and “received treatment in another country, coordinated by an established, US-funded, binational TB program” (26 of 87 cases, 30%). Applying the new proposed definition, 39 of 87 pilot cases of TB (45%) met the definition of binational.

          Conclusion:

          Input from partners who were responsible for the care and treatment of patients who cross the United States–Mexico border was crucial in defining a binational case of TB.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Public Health Rep
          Public Health Rep
          PHR
          spphr
          Public Health Reports
          SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
          0033-3549
          1468-2877
          23 March 2018
          Mar-Apr 2018
          : 133
          : 2
          : 155-162
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
          Author notes
          [*]Rachel S. Yelk Woodruff, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, MS E-10, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. Email: rwoodruff@ 123456cdc.gov
          Article
          PMC5871146 PMC5871146 5871146 10.1177_0033354918760575
          10.1177/0033354918760575
          5871146
          29570435
          f1ac220e-b3de-41ba-91d2-54a917ca659b
          © 2018, Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health
          History
          Categories
          Public Health Methodology
          Custom metadata
          March/April 2018

          binational,US–Mexico border,surveillance,tuberculosis
          binational, US–Mexico border, surveillance, tuberculosis

          Comments

          Comment on this article