16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative study of hyoscine doses as antisialagogue for patients receiving ketofol sedation undergoing colonoscopy procedures

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          To compare the effects of different regimens of hyoscine as antisialagogue in patients undergoing ketofol sedation for colonoscopy procedures.

          Patients and Methods:

          In this prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial 200 American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II aged 20–60-year-old undergoing colonoscopy were randomly assigned into four equal groups, group A received 5 mg hyoscine intravenous, group B received 10 mg, group C received 20 mg intravenous, and control group (D) that was received saline. All patients were sedated using ketofol titrated to achieve Ramsey Sedation Score 4, hemodynamic variables and occurrence of increased secretions were evaluated and recorded.

          Results:

          Hyoscine in a dose of 10 mg was the optimum dose to achieve least salivation with the least side effect while hyoscine 5 mg was not efficient to achieve dry field or good surgical conditions. However, hyoscine 20 mg achieved dry field and fair surgical conditions in expenses of tachycardia.

          Conclusion:

          Hyoscine 10 mg was the least effective dose that significantly reduced hypersalivation in patients receiving ketofol sedation for colonoscopy procedures, this dose was as effective as 20 mg in draying secretion but with significantly less tachycardia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) versus propofol alone for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a randomized double-blind trial.

          We determine whether a 1:1 mixture of ketamine and propofol (ketofol) for emergency department (ED) procedural sedation results in a 13% or more absolute reduction in adverse respiratory events compared with propofol alone. Participants were randomized to receive either ketofol or propofol in a double-blind fashion. Inclusion criteria were aged 14 years or older and American Society of Anesthesiology class 1 to 3 status. The primary outcome was the number and proportion of patients experiencing an adverse respiratory event as defined by the Quebec Criteria. Secondary outcomes were sedation consistency, efficacy, and time; induction time; and adverse events. A total of 284 patients were enrolled, 142 per group. Forty-three (30%) patients experienced an adverse respiratory event in the ketofol group compared with 46 (32%) in the propofol group (difference 2%; 95% confidence interval -9% to 13%; P=.80). Three ketofol patients and 1 propofol patient received bag-valve-mask ventilation. Sixty-five (46%) patients receiving ketofol and 93 (65%) patients receiving propofol required repeated medication dosing or progressed to a Ramsay Sedation Score of 4 or less during their procedure (difference 19%; 95% confidence interval 8% to 31%; P=.001). Six patients receiving ketofol were treated for recovery agitation. Other secondary outcomes were similar between the groups. Patients and staff were highly satisfied with both agents. Ketofol for ED procedural sedation does not result in a reduced incidence of adverse respiratory events compared with propofol alone. Induction time, efficacy, and sedation time were similar; however, sedation depth appeared to be more consistent with ketofol. Copyright © 2012. Published by Mosby, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical policy: procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Three treatment approaches and clinical factors in the reduction of drooling.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Anesth Essays Res
                Anesth Essays Res
                AER
                Anesthesia, Essays and Researches
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0259-1162
                2229-7685
                Jan-Apr 2016
                : 10
                : 1
                : 94-97
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Dr. Atef Kamal Salama, Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Kasr Elaine Street, Cairo, Egypt. E-mail: atef.kamel@ 123456kasralainy.edu.eg
                Article
                AER-10-94
                10.4103/0259-1162.164735
                4767070
                26957698
                f2852e0d-158c-4f7e-a0a6-275c123edcc2
                Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                colonoscopy,hyoscine,ketofol
                colonoscopy, hyoscine, ketofol

                Comments

                Comment on this article