12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sleep and Pain : A Systematic Review of Studies of Mediation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

          Abstract

          Objectives:

          A relationship between sleep and pain is well established. A better understanding of the mechanisms that link sleep and pain intensity is urgently needed to optimize pain management interventions. The objective of this systematic review was to identify, synthesize, and critically appraise studies that have investigated putative mediators on the path between sleep and pain intensity.

          Methods:

          A systematic search of 5 electronic bibliographic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) was conducted. Eligible studies had to apply a formal test of mediation to variables on the path between a sleep variable and pain intensity or vice versa. All searches, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted by at least 2 independent reviewers.

          Results:

          The search yielded 2839 unique articles, 9 of which were eligible. Of 13 mediation analyses, 11 investigated pathways from a sleep variable to pain intensity. Putative mediators included affect/mood, depression and/or anxiety, attention to pain, pain helplessness, stress, fatigue, and physical activity. Two analyses investigated pathways from pain intensity to a sleep variable, examining the potentially mediating role of depressive symptoms and mood. Although evidence supported a mediating role for psychological and physiological aspects of emotional experiences and attentional processes, methodological limitations were common, including use of cross-sectional data and minimal adjustment for potential confounders.

          Discussion:

          A growing body of research is applying mediation analysis to elucidate mechanistic pathways between sleep and pain intensity. Currently sparse evidence would be illuminated by more intensively collected longitudinal data and improvements in analysis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire.

          A short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) has been developed. The main component of the SF-MPQ consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. Three pain scores are derived from the sum of the intensity rank values of the words chosen for sensory, affective and total descriptors. The SF-MPQ also includes the Present Pain Intensity (PPI) index of the standard MPQ and a visual analogue scale (VAS). The SF-MPQ scores obtained from patients in post-surgical and obstetrical wards and physiotherapy and dental departments were compared to the scores obtained with the standard MPQ. The correlations were consistently high and significant. The SF-MPQ was also shown to be sufficiently sensitive to demonstrate differences due to treatment at statistical levels comparable to those obtained with the standard form. The SF-MPQ shows promise as a useful tool in situations in which the standard MPQ takes too long to administer, yet qualitative information is desired and the PPI and VAS are inadequate.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mediation Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide

            This article provides an overview of recent developments in mediation analysis, that is, analyses used to assess the relative magnitude of different pathways and mechanisms by which an exposure may affect an outcome. Traditional approaches to mediation in the biomedical and social sciences are described. Attention is given to the confounding assumptions required for a causal interpretation of direct and indirect effect estimates. Methods from the causal inference literature to conduct mediation in the presence of exposure-mediator interactions, binary outcomes, binary mediators, and case-control study designs are presented. Sensitivity analysis techniques for unmeasured confounding and measurement error are introduced. Discussion is given to extensions to time-to-event outcomes and multiple mediators. Further flexible modeling strategies arising from the precise counterfactual definitions of direct and indirect effects are also described. The focus throughout is on methodology that is easily implementable in practice across a broad range of potential applications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.

              Researchers often conduct mediation analysis in order to indirectly assess the effect of a proposed cause on some outcome through a proposed mediator. The utility of mediation analysis stems from its ability to go beyond the merely descriptive to a more functional understanding of the relationships among variables. A necessary component of mediation is a statistically and practically significant indirect effect. Although mediation hypotheses are frequently explored in psychological research, formal significance tests of indirect effects are rarely conducted. After a brief overview of mediation, we argue the importance of directly testing the significance of indirect effects and provide SPSS and SAS macros that facilitate estimation of the indirect effect with a normal theory approach and a bootstrap approach to obtaining confidence intervals, as well as the traditional approach advocated by Baron and Kenny (1986). We hope that this discussion and the macros will enhance the frequency of formal mediation tests in the psychology literature. Electronic copies of these macros may be downloaded from the Psychonomic Society's Web archive at www.psychonomic.org/archive/.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin J Pain
                Clin J Pain
                AJP
                The Clinical Journal of Pain
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                0749-8047
                1536-5409
                June 2019
                01 March 2019
                : 35
                : 6
                : 544-558
                Affiliations
                [* ]Epidemiology Group, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition
                []Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health
                [# ]Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen
                []Evidence Synthesis and Modelling for Health Improvement (ESMI), Institute for Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter
                [†† ]Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry
                [** ]Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
                []Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kratz Lab
                [§ ]Department of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
                []Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
                Author notes
                Reprints: Daniel Whibley, PhD, Epidemiology Group, Level 1, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK AB25 2ZD (e-mail: daniel.whibley@ 123456abdn.ac.uk ).
                Article
                00014
                10.1097/AJP.0000000000000697
                6504189
                30829737
                f2b5756e-5f12-49ca-bb19-2c9a6f637db5
                Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 28 August 2018
                : 1 February 2019
                : 14 February 2019
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                T
                TRUE

                systematic review,mediation analysis,pain,sleep problems

                Comments

                Comment on this article