7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The prophylactic use of endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic dehiscence after rectal anterior resection: is it feasible for redo surgery?

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Endoluminal negative pressure therapy in colorectal anastomotic leaks.

          The aim of the present work was to perform an up-to-date review of the literature on endoluminal negative pressure therapy for colorectal anastomotic leak.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Outcome After Redo Surgery for Complicated Colorectal and Coloanal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review.

            When a colorectal or coloanal anastomosis fails because of persistent leakage or stenosis, or the anastomosis has to be resected for recurrent cancer, constructing a new anastomosis might be an option in selected patients. This is a rare and complex type of redo surgery.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The “impossible” rectal anastomosis: a novel use for endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy

              Purpose Low rectal anastomoses can safely be performed, usually secured by a diverting ostomy. However, in cases of inflammation, extensive scarring, after extensive radiation, or after severe stapler dysfunction the risk for an anastomotic leak may become prohibitively high. We present a novel use for endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy (EVAT) for otherwise “impossible” low rectal anastomoses. Methods Our initial series consisted of 14 consecutive patients who underwent prophylactic EVAT treatment due to unsafe low colorectal anastomosis. The vacuum sponge was placed intraoperatively in cases otherwise calling for a Hartmann’s procedure. An open-pored polyurethane sponge was placed prophylactically transanally for a mean duration of 11 days. Patient characteristics, complications, and risk factors were prospectively collected from medical records and analyzed. Results Between March 2017 and September 2019, we performed this novel technique in 14 patients enabling us to perform an anastomosis. Our collective consisted of 4 female (29%) and 10 male (71%) patients with a medium age of 59 years. Underlying disease was colorectal cancer in 10 patients, ovarian cancer, perforated sigmoid diverticulitis, ischemic colitis and sarcoma in one patient each. Dominant factors putting the anastomosis at extremely high risk were acute inflammation (n = 2), frozen pelvis (n = 2), intraoperative local chemotherapy (n = 2), stapler dysfunction (n = 2), non-closable rectal stump (n = 2), empty pelvis (n = 1) and ultra-low anastomosis (n = 3). Prophylactic EVAT was successful in 92% and gastrointestinal continuity was preserved in all patients. Conclusion This is the first description of prophylactic EVAT treatment. It seems to be a simple and safe method to enforce the high-risk low rectal anastomosis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Techniques in Coloproctology
                Tech Coloproctol
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                1123-6337
                1128-045X
                April 2022
                January 03 2022
                April 2022
                : 26
                : 4
                : 319-320
                Article
                10.1007/s10151-021-02566-w
                34981274
                f2e7b282-62ee-4066-b552-795785323778
                © 2022

                https://www.springer.com/tdm

                https://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article