13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Predictive validity of biochemical biomarkers in knee osteoarthritis: data from the FNIH OA Biomarkers Consortium

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To investigate a targeted set of biochemical biomarkers as predictors of clinically relevant osteoarthritis (OA) progression.

          Methods

          Eighteen biomarkers were measured at baseline, 12 months (M) and 24 M in serum (s) and/or urine (u) of cases (n=194) from the OA initiative cohort with knee OA and radiographic and persistent pain worsening from 24 to 48 M and controls (n=406) not meeting both end point criteria. Primary analyses used multivariable regression models to evaluate the association between biomarkers (baseline and time-integrated concentrations (TICs) over 12 and 24 M, transposed to z values) and case status, adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, race, baseline radiographic joint space width, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, pain and pain medication use. For biomarkers with adjusted p<0.1, the c-statistic (area under the curve (AUC)), net reclassification index and the integrated discrimination improvement index were used to further select for hierarchical multivariable discriminative analysis and to determine the most predictive and parsimonious model.

          Results

          The 24 M TIC of eight biomarkers significantly predicted case status (ORs per 1 SD change in biomarker): sCTXI 1.28, sHA 1.22, sNTXI 1.25, uC2C-HUSA 1.27, uCTXII, 1.37, uNTXI 1.29, uCTXIα 1.32, uCTXIβ 1.27. 24 M TIC of uCTXII (1.47–1.72) and uC2C-Human Urine Sandwich Assay (HUSA) (1.36–1.50) both predicted individual group status (pain worsening, joint space loss and their combination). The most predictive and parsimonious combinatorial model for case status consisted of 24 M TIC uCTXII, sHA and sNTXI (AUC 0.667 adjusted). Baseline uCTXII and uCTXIα both significantly predicted case status (OR 1.29 and 1.20, respectively).

          Conclusions

          Several systemic candidate biomarkers hold promise as predictors of pain and structural worsening of OA.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          0372355
          640
          Ann Rheum Dis
          Ann. Rheum. Dis.
          Annals of the rheumatic diseases
          0003-4967
          1468-2060
          1 March 2018
          13 June 2016
          January 2017
          14 March 2018
          : 76
          : 1
          : 186-195
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Duke Molecular Physiology Institute and Division of Rheumatology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
          [2 ]Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
          [3 ]LabCorp Clinical Trials, San Leandro, California, USA
          [4 ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
          [5 ]AbbVie, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
          [6 ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
          [7 ]Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
          [8 ]Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital and Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
          Author notes
          Correspondence to. Dr Virginia Byers Kraus, Box 104775, Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, 300 North Duke St, Durham, NC 27701, USA; vbk@ 123456duke.edu

          Twitter Follow David Hunter at @ProfDavidHunter

          Article
          PMC5851287 PMC5851287 5851287 nihpa942770
          10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209252
          5851287
          27296323
          f30e389f-896a-4f00-aac9-f27129100723

          To request permissions go to: http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions

          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article