3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Offline adaptive radiation therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer: a case study

      , , , ,
      Medical Dosimetry
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this case study is to develop a method to account for the difference in the daily volumes in the bladder, rectum, and targets in prostate radiotherapy and to compare the predicted dose to the actual dose to these organs. Five patients, both prospectively and retrospectively, were selected from 2 different cancer centers, with a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of prostate cancer. The patients' planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) were contoured on the computed tomography (CT) dataset using either Eclipse or Monaco treatment planning systems (TPSs). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were collected before each daily treatment and exported to MIM software for analysis. The automatically generated reports evaluated the organ volume changes, the actual dose received during a single fraction, and the projected dose to each organ at the completion of the treatment course via comparative cumulative dose-volume histograms (DVHs). Volume changes in the bladder and rectum can cause notable variations in the prescribed dose vs the actual dose received. MIM software was proven to have utility prospectively by tabulating daily dose and projecting final doses, potentially aiding physicians in decisions about the boost plans, thus making offline adaptive radiation therapy (ART) clinically manageable.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Medical Dosimetry
          Medical Dosimetry
          Elsevier BV
          09583947
          February 2018
          February 2018
          Article
          10.1016/j.meddos.2017.12.005
          29398223
          f3bb6b0c-42b3-419a-b35f-20a2bf1900f2
          © 2018

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article