0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Scoping Review of the Complementary Feeding Practices and Early Eating Experiences of Children With Down Syndrome

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Children with Down syndrome may experience more challenges in their early feeding and may be introduced to complementary foods comparatively later than typically developing (TD) children. This scoping review aimed to identify and synthesize the existing literature that describes feeding problems and early eating experiences relating to the period of complementary feeding for children with Down syndrome.

          Methods

          Scopus, PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and PsycInfo were searched. Journal articles published between January 1991 and June 2022 that reported on the complementary feeding period with children with Down syndrome were included.

          Results

          Eighteen journal articles met the inclusion criteria. Children with Down syndrome were introduced to complementary foods later than TD children and progressed to more challenging food textures at a slower rate. Gross and fine motor skill delays and sensory difficulties contributed to secondary feeding problems such as difficulties chewing, biting, and reduced awareness of food on lips and tongue. Parents of children with Down syndrome reported exercising more caution and employing more controlling feeding practices compared to TD and had higher levels of concern regarding their child’s weight.

          Conclusions

          Guidelines and early feeding support specific to children with Down syndrome should be available before the first complementary foods are introduced and throughout this period. Feeding support should aim to address parental concerns and provide assistance when feeding problems occur, to minimize delays and encourage the optimum development of eating abilities. Future research should address the development of feeding problems during this period and explore possible interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Scoping studies: advancing the methodology

              Background Scoping studies are an increasingly popular approach to reviewing health research evidence. In 2005, Arksey and O'Malley published the first methodological framework for conducting scoping studies. While this framework provides an excellent foundation for scoping study methodology, further clarifying and enhancing this framework will help support the consistency with which authors undertake and report scoping studies and may encourage researchers and clinicians to engage in this process. Discussion We build upon our experiences conducting three scoping studies using the Arksey and O'Malley methodology to propose recommendations that clarify and enhance each stage of the framework. Recommendations include: clarifying and linking the purpose and research question (stage one); balancing feasibility with breadth and comprehensiveness of the scoping process (stage two); using an iterative team approach to selecting studies (stage three) and extracting data (stage four); incorporating a numerical summary and qualitative thematic analysis, reporting results, and considering the implications of study findings to policy, practice, or research (stage five); and incorporating consultation with stakeholders as a required knowledge translation component of scoping study methodology (stage six). Lastly, we propose additional considerations for scoping study methodology in order to support the advancement, application and relevance of scoping studies in health research. Summary Specific recommendations to clarify and enhance this methodology are outlined for each stage of the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Continued debate and development about scoping study methodology will help to maximize the usefulness and rigor of scoping study findings within healthcare research and practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ValidationRole: Writing - original draftRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Journal
                J Pediatr Psychol
                J Pediatr Psychol
                jpepsy
                Journal of Pediatric Psychology
                Oxford University Press
                0146-8693
                1465-735X
                November 2023
                21 September 2023
                21 September 2023
                : 48
                : 11
                : 914-930
                Affiliations
                Department of Psychology, Sport and Geography, University of Hertfordshire , UK
                Department of Psychology, Sport and Geography, University of Hertfordshire , UK
                Department of Psychology, Sport and Geography, University of Hertfordshire , UK
                Department of Psychology, Sport and Geography, University of Hertfordshire , UK
                Department of Psychology, Sport and Geography, University of Hertfordshire , UK
                Author notes
                All correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Laura Hielscher, Department of Psychology, Sport and Geography, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB UK. E-mail: l.k.hielscher@ 123456herts.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6901-2075
                Article
                jsad060
                10.1093/jpepsy/jsad060
                10653358
                37738668
                f4014751-1c2a-4c26-818e-9403355c7dca
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 April 2023
                : 01 September 2023
                : 04 September 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 17
                Funding
                Funded by: University of Hertfordshire, DOI 10.13039/501100001315;
                Categories
                Regular Article
                AcademicSubjects/MED00810
                AcademicSubjects/SCI02112

                Pediatrics
                children,complementary feeding,down syndrome,feeding problems
                Pediatrics
                children, complementary feeding, down syndrome, feeding problems

                Comments

                Comment on this article