18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Meta‐analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species‐specific abundance in nature

      1 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2
      Environmental DNA
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Quantifying effects of UV-B, temperature, and pH on eDNA degradation in aquatic microcosms

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Distance, flow and PCR inhibition: eDNA dynamics in two headwater streams.

              Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection has emerged as a powerful tool for monitoring aquatic organisms, but much remains unknown about the dynamics of aquatic eDNA over a range of environmental conditions. DNA concentrations in streams and rivers will depend not only on the equilibrium between DNA entering the water and DNA leaving the system through degradation, but also on downstream transport. To improve understanding of the dynamics of eDNA concentration in lotic systems, we introduced caged trout into two fishless headwater streams and took eDNA samples at evenly spaced downstream intervals. This was repeated 18 times from mid-summer through autumn, over flows ranging from approximately 1-96 L/s. We used quantitative PCR to relate DNA copy number to distance from source. We found that regardless of flow, there were detectable levels of DNA at 239.5 m. The main effect of flow on eDNA counts was in opposite directions in the two streams. At the lowest flows, eDNA counts were highest close to the source and quickly trailed off over distance. At the highest flows, DNA counts were relatively low both near and far from the source. Biomass was positively related to eDNA copy number in both streams. A combination of cell settling, turbulence and dilution effects is probably responsible for our observations. Additionally, during high leaf deposition periods, the presence of inhibitors resulted in no amplification for high copy number samples in the absence of an inhibition-releasing strategy, demonstrating the necessity to carefully consider inhibition in eDNA analysis. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Environmental DNA
                Environmental DNA
                Wiley
                2637-4943
                2637-4943
                April 15 2019
                May 2019
                April 16 2019
                May 2019
                : 1
                : 1
                : 5-13
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Département des sciences biologiques Université du Québec à Montréal Montreal QC Canada
                [2 ]Group for Interuniversity Research in Limnology and Aquatic Environment (GRIL) Montreal QC
                [3 ]Department of Biology Concordia University Montreal QC Canada
                Article
                10.1002/edn3.7
                f482a557-aa2a-4b29-927c-b6d8712c4e2b
                © 2019

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article