10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Managing Pain in People with Cancer—a Systematic Review of the Attitudes and Knowledge of Professionals, Patients, Caregivers and Public

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cancer pain is a common symptom experienced by patients, caused either by the disease or its treatment. Morphine remains the most effective and recommended treatment for cancer pain. However, cancer patients still do not receive appropriate management for their pain, and under-treatment is common. Lack of knowledge and negative attitudes towards cancer pain and analgesia among professionals, patients and family caregivers are reported as one of the most common barriers to effective cancer pain management (CPM). To systematically review research on the nature and impact of attitudes and knowledge towards CPM, a systematic literature search of 6 databases (the Cochrane library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science and EMBASE) was undertaken in July 2018. Additionally, hand-searching of Google, Google Scholar and reference lists was conducted. The inclusion criteria were adult (18–65 years of age), studies which included attitudes and knowledge towards CPM, studies written in English, published literature only and cross-sectional design. Included studies were critically appraised by two researchers independently using the Joanna Briggs Institute Analytical Cross Sectional Studies Assessment (JBI-ACSSA). A total of 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. The main finding was that among professionals, patients, caregivers and the public there were similar attitudinal barriers to effective CPM. The most commonly cited barriers were fear of drug addiction, tolerance of medication and side effects of opioids. We also found differences between professional groups (physicians versus nurses) and between different countries based on their potential exposure to palliative care training and services. There are still barriers to effective CPM, which might result in unrelieved cancer pain. Therefore, more educational programmes and training for professionals on CPM are needed. Furthermore, patients, caregivers, and the public need more general awareness and adequate level of knowledge about CPM.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s13187-019-01548-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Quality of cancer pain management: an update of a systematic review of undertreatment of patients with cancer.

          Pain is a frequent symptom in patients with cancer, with substantial impact. Despite the availability of opioids and updated guidelines from reliable leading societies, undertreatment is still frequent.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Developing the review question and inclusion criteria.

            This article is the second in a new series on the systematic review from the Joanna Briggs Institute, an international collaborative supporting evidence-based practice in nursing, medicine, and allied health fields. The purpose of the series is to show nurses how to conduct a systematic review-one step at a time. This article details the process of articulating a review question to guide the search for relevant studies and discusses how to define inclusion criteria for the study-selection phase of the review.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Guide to Writing a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol to Enhance Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Health Care.

              The qualitative systematic review is a rapidly developing area of nursing research. In order to present trustworthy, high-quality recommendations, such reviews should be based on a review protocol to minimize bias and enhance transparency and reproducibility. Although there are a number of resources available to guide researchers in developing a quantitative review protocol, very few resources exist for qualitative reviews.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                umsmam@leeds.ac.uk
                Journal
                J Cancer Educ
                J Cancer Educ
                Journal of Cancer Education
                Springer US (New York )
                0885-8195
                1543-0154
                22 May 2019
                22 May 2019
                2020
                : 35
                : 2
                : 214-240
                Affiliations
                GRID grid.9909.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8403, Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, , University of Leeds, ; Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1567-7757
                Article
                1548
                10.1007/s13187-019-01548-9
                7076060
                31119708
                f4b01492-ae65-44dd-8d96-f3a9d7c1f4e0
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministry of Education in Libya
                Award ID: AA274-52855
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © American Association for Cancer Education 2020

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                cancer pain management,attitudes and knowledge,professionals,patients,caregivers,public,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article