1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pfannenstiel incision for surgical excision of a huge pelvi-abdominal cystadenoma: a case report

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A 56-year-old post-menopausal woman, with 3 previous caesarean sections (CSs), presented to the emergency department with abdominal distension, without abdominal pain, tenderness, and/or rigidity.

          The abdominal examination of the studied woman showed a mobile, pelvi-abdominal mass 4 fingers breadth above the umbilicus.

          Magnetic resonance imaging study of the mass showed a large, well-defined, multi-locular cystic mass measuring 25.5 x 21 cm, which was most probably a right ovarian cystadenoma. The studied woman signed a written consent form for total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, after the normal tumour markers, and pre-operative investigations.

          Under general anaesthesia, an elliptical Pfannenstiel skin incision was done to remove the old CSs scars, followed by opening of the patient’s anterior abdominal wall in layers. Total abdominal hysterectomy and unilateral left SO were done first, to deliver the ovarian mass easily and intact outside the abdomen after the uterus.

          Due to failure to deliver the mass outside the abdomen after removal of the uterus, the right infundibulopelvic ligament was ligated behind the mass, while the mass was still inside the abdomen.

          A longitudinal midline incision in the upper flap of the rectus sheath (not involving the skin) was added to deliver the excised right ovarian mass outside the abdomen.

          Successfully, the right ovarian mass delivered intact outside the abdomen after the added longitudinal midline incision. This report highlights that the midline vertical incision is not the standard abdominal incision. Moreover, the transverse Pfannenstiel incision is cosmetically better, and should be routinely used to avoid unnecessary vertical abdominal incision.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A review of ovary torsion

          Ovarian torsion is a rare but emergency condition in women. Early diagnosis is necessary to preserve the function of the ovaries and tubes and prevent severe morbidity. Ovarian torsion refers to complete or partial rotation of the adnexal supporting organ with ischemia. It can affect females of all ages. Ovarian torsion occurs in around 2%–15% of patients who have surgical treatment of adnexal masses. The main risk in ovarian torsion is an ovarian mass. The most common symptom of ovarian torsion is acute onset of pelvic pain, followed by nausea and vomiting. Pelvic ultrasonography can provide information on ovarian cysts. Once ovarian torsion is suspected, surgery or detorsion is the mainstay of diagnosis and treatment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Vertical compared with transverse incisions in abdominal surgery.

            To reach an evidence-based consensus on the relative merits of vertical and transverse laparotomy incisions. Review of all published randomised controlled trials that compared the postoperative complications after the two main types of abdominal incisions, vertical and transverse. Teaching hospital, Denmark. Patients undergoing open abdominal operations. For some of the variables (burst abdomen and incisional hernia) it was considered adequate to include retrospective studies. Studies were identified through Medline, Cochrane library, Embase, and a manual search of relevant journals. The references cited in these studies were reviewed to find out whether any other trials fitted the selection criteria. Early complications including postoperative pain, pulmonary complications, burst abdomen, wound infection, and hospital stay, and late complications (incisional hernia). Eleven randomised controlled trials and seven retrospective studies were identified. The transverse incision offers as good an access to most intra-abdominal structures as a vertical incision. The transverse incision results in significantly less postoperative pain and fewer pulmonary complications. Vertical laparotomy, however, is associated with shorter operating time and better possibilities for extension of the incision. The pooled odds ratio for burst abdomen in the vertical incision group was 2.86 (95% confidence interval 1.72 to 4.73, p = 0.0001), and regarding late incisional hernia the pooled odds ratio was 1.68 (95% confidence interval 1.10 to 2.57. p = 0.02). Transverse incisions in abdominal surgery are based on better anatomical and physiological principles. They should be recommended, as the early postoperative period is associated with fewer complications (pain, burst abdomen, and pulmonary morbidity) and there is lower incidence of late incisional hernia after transverse compared with vertical laparotomy. A midline incision is still the incision of choice in conditions that require rapid intra-abdominal entry (such as trauma) or where the preoperative diagnosis is uncertain, as it is quicker and can easily be extended.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCTN60734227).

              There are 2 main types of access for patients requiring major open, elective abdominal surgery: the midline or the transverse approach. The aim of this study is to compare both approaches by focusing on postoperative pain, complications, and frequency of incisional hernias. A recent Cochrane review suggested that transverse incisions may be less painful but incisional hernia rates do not differ. Randomized, patient- and observer-blinded, monocentric, equivalence clinical trial. Patients were scheduled for elective primary abdominal incisions. Composite primary end point measured 48 hours after surgery was the total amount of analgesics (piritramide) required in the last 24 hours and pain (Visual Analogue Scale). Secondary end points were early-onset and late complications. This study is registered in the ISRCTN registry and has the ID number ISRCTN60734227. Two hundred patients (101 midline and 99 transverse) were randomized. Both incision types resulted in similar amounts of required analgesics (95% confidence interval [-0.38; -0.33] was included in the equivalence level). For the Visual Analogue Scale, both the 95% and 90% CI (0-10) were neither within the equivalence levels nor were their differences significant at the 5% level. No relevant differences between midline and transverse incisions were observed for 30-day mortality (2 vs. 2, P = 0.99), mortality after one year (15 vs. 23, P = 0.15), pulmonary complications (13 vs. 17, P = 0.43), median length of hospital stay (11 vs. 12 days, P = 0.08), median time to tolerance of solid food (12 vs. 14 days, P = 0.30), and incisional hernias after one year (13 vs. 8, P = 0.48). More wound infections occurred in the transverse group (15 vs. 5, P = 0.02). The decision about the incision should be driven by surgeon preference with respect to the patient's disease and anatomy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Prz Menopauzalny
                Prz Menopauzalny
                MR
                Przegla̜d Menopauzalny = Menopause Review
                Termedia Publishing House
                1643-8876
                2299-0038
                26 May 2021
                June 2021
                : 20
                : 2
                : 99-102
                Affiliations
                [0001] 1Ahmadi Hospital, Kuwait Oil Company, Ahmadi, Kuwait
                [0002] 2Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Prof. Ibrahim Abdelazim MD, Ahmadi Hospital, Kuwait Oil Company, Ahmadi, Kuwait. e-mail: dr.ibrahimanwar@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                44177
                10.5114/pm.2021.106469
                8297627
                34321988
                f5091c46-3ecc-44bc-a7ae-c7788fb12b51
                Copyright: © 2021 Termedia Sp. z o. o.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

                History
                : 03 December 2020
                : 02 January 2021
                Categories
                Case Report

                pfannenstiel,incision,huge,cystadenoma
                pfannenstiel, incision, huge, cystadenoma

                Comments

                Comment on this article