74
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
4 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Human-animal relationships and interactions during the Covid-19 lockdown phase in the UK: Investigating links with mental health and loneliness

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Covid-19 pandemic raises questions about the role that relationships and interactions between humans and animals play in the context of widespread social distancing and isolation measures. We aimed to investigate links between mental health and loneliness, companion animal ownership, the human-animal bond, and human-animal interactions; and to explore animal owners’ perceptions related to the role of their animals during lockdown.

          Methods

          A cross-sectional online survey of UK residents over 18 years of age was conducted between April and June 2020. The questionnaire included validated and bespoke items measuring demographics; exposures and outcomes related to mental health, wellbeing and loneliness; the human-animal bond and human-animal interactions.

          Results

          Of 5,926 participants, 5,323 (89.8%) had at least one companion animal. Most perceived their animals to be a source of considerable support, but concerns were reported related to various practical aspects of providing care during lockdown. Strength of the human-animal bond did not differ significantly between species. Poorer mental health pre-lockdown was associated with a stronger reported human-animal bond ( b = -.014, 95% CI [-.023 - -.005], p = .002). Animal ownership compared with non-ownership was associated with smaller decreases in mental health (b = .267, 95% CI [.079 - .455], p = .005) and smaller increases in loneliness ( b = -.302, 95% CI [-.461 - -.144], p = .001) since lockdown.

          Conclusion

          The human-animal bond is a construct that may be linked to mental health vulnerability in animal owners. Strength of the human-animal bond in terms of emotional closeness or intimacy dimensions appears to be independent of animal species. Animal ownership seemed to mitigate some of the detrimental psychological effects of Covid-19 lockdown. Further targeted investigation of the role of human-animal relationships and interactions for human health, including testing of the social buffering hypothesis and the development of instruments suited for use across animal species, is required.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies.

          Most studies of social relationships in later life focus on the amount of social contact, not on individuals' perceptions of social isolation. However, loneliness is likely to be an important aspect of aging. A major limiting factor in studying loneliness has been the lack of a measure suitable for large-scale social surveys. This article describes a short loneliness scale developed specifically for use on a telephone survey. The scale has three items and a simplified set of response categories but appears to measure overall loneliness quite well. The authors also document the relationship between loneliness and several commonly used measures of objective social isolation. As expected, they find that objective and subjective isolation are related. However, the relationship is relatively modest, indicating that the quantitative and qualitative aspects of social relationships are distinct. This result suggests the importance of studying both dimensions of social relationships in the aging process.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                25 September 2020
                2020
                25 September 2020
                : 15
                : 9
                : e0239397
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
                [2 ] Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [3 ] Department of Behavioural Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
                [4 ] School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
                [5 ] School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
                University of Milan, ITALY
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2420-4919
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7801-7636
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9522-903X
                Article
                PONE-D-20-22780
                10.1371/journal.pone.0239397
                7518616
                32976500
                f50d7ff4-a36e-42fb-969a-e03779c60a06
                © 2020 Ratschen et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 22 July 2020
                : 7 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 5, Pages: 17
                Funding
                The authors received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Pets and Companion Animals
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animals
                Pets and Companion Animals
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Infectious Diseases
                Viral Diseases
                Covid 19
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Animal Behavior
                Animal Sociality
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Animal Behavior
                Animal Sociality
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animal Behavior
                Animal Sociality
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Pandemics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Collective Human Behavior
                Interpersonal Relationships
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Collective Human Behavior
                Interpersonal Relationships
                Engineering and Technology
                Measurement
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are uploaded to the OSF repository and publicly accessible via the following URL: https://osf.io/a5uy9/.
                COVID-19

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article