12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dopamine transporter binding in symptomatic controls and healthy volunteers: Considerations for neuroimaging trials

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Symptomatic controls have higher putaminal DAT binding than healthy controls.

          • The difference could be due to selection/self-selection bias or upregulation.

          • The effect should be taken into account when neuroimaging trials are designed.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To evaluate possible differences between brain dopamine transporter (DAT) binding in a group of symptomatic parkinsonism patients without dopaminergic degeneration and healthy individuals.

          Background

          Dopaminergic neuroimaging studies of Parkinson’s disease (PD) have often used control groups formed from symptomatic patients with apparently normal striatal dopamine function. We sought to investigate whether symptomatic patients can be used to represent dopaminergically normal healthy controls.

          Methods

          Forty healthy elderly individuals were scanned with DAT [ 123I]FP-CIT SPECT and compared to 69 age- and sex-matched symptomatic patients with nondegenerative conditions (including essential tremor, drug-induced parkinsonism and vascular parkinsonism). An automated region-of-interest based analysis of the caudate nucleus and the anterior/posterior putamen was performed. Specific binding ratios (SBR = [ROI-occ]/occ) were compared between the groups.

          Results

          DAT binding in symptomatic patients was 8.6% higher in the posterior putamen than in healthy controls (p = 0.03). Binding correlated negatively with age in both groups but not with motor symptom severity, cognitive function or depression ratings.

          Conclusions

          Putaminal DAT binding, as measured with [ 123I]FP-CIT SPECT, was higher in symptomatic controls than in healthy individuals. The reason for the difference is unclear but can include selection bias when DAT binding is used to aid clinical diagnosis and possible self-selection bias in healthy volunteerism. This effect should be taken into consideration when designing and interpreting neuroimaging trials investigating the dopamine system with [ 123I]FP-CIT SPECT.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease.

          This document presents the Movement Disorder Society Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson's disease (PD). The Movement Disorder Society PD Criteria are intended for use in clinical research but also may be used to guide clinical diagnosis. The benchmark for these criteria is expert clinical diagnosis; the criteria aim to systematize the diagnostic process, to make it reproducible across centers and applicable by clinicians with less expertise in PD diagnosis. Although motor abnormalities remain central, increasing recognition has been given to nonmotor manifestations; these are incorporated into both the current criteria and particularly into separate criteria for prodromal PD. Similar to previous criteria, the Movement Disorder Society PD Criteria retain motor parkinsonism as the core feature of the disease, defined as bradykinesia plus rest tremor or rigidity. Explicit instructions for defining these cardinal features are included. After documentation of parkinsonism, determination of PD as the cause of parkinsonism relies on three categories of diagnostic features: absolute exclusion criteria (which rule out PD), red flags (which must be counterbalanced by additional supportive criteria to allow diagnosis of PD), and supportive criteria (positive features that increase confidence of the PD diagnosis). Two levels of certainty are delineated: clinically established PD (maximizing specificity at the expense of reduced sensitivity) and probable PD (which balances sensitivity and specificity). The Movement Disorder Society criteria retain elements proven valuable in previous criteria and omit aspects that are no longer justified, thereby encapsulating diagnosis according to current knowledge. As understanding of PD expands, the Movement Disorder Society criteria will need continuous revision to accommodate these advances.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Factor structure of the barratt impulsiveness scale

            The purpose of the present study was to revise the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale Version 10 (BIS-10), identify the factor structure of the items among normals, and compare their scores on the revised form (BIS-11) with psychiatric inpatients and prison inmates. The scale was administered to 412 college undergraduates, 248 psychiatric inpatients, and 73 male prison inmates. Exploratory principal components analysis of the items identified six primary factors and three second-order factors. The three second-order factors were labeled Attentional Impulsiveness, Motor Impulsiveness, and Nonplanning Impulsiveness. Two of the three second-order factors identified in the BIS-11 were consistent with those proposed by Barratt (1985), but no cognitive impulsiveness component was identified per se. The results of the present study suggest that the total score of the BIS-11 is an internally consistent measure of impulsiveness and has potential clinical utility for measuring impulsiveness among selected patient and inmate populations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Structural Approach to Selection Bias

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neuroimage Clin
                Neuroimage Clin
                NeuroImage : Clinical
                Elsevier
                2213-1582
                30 August 2021
                2021
                30 August 2021
                : 32
                : 102807
                Affiliations
                [a ]Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
                [b ]Department of Neurology, Satasairaala Central Hospital, Pori, Finland
                [c ]Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
                [d ]Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
                [e ]Department of Medical Physics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
                [f ]Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Neurology), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
                [g ]Department of Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
                [h ]Turku Brain and Mind Center, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
                [i ]Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author: Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital POB 52, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland. ealhonk@ 123456utu.fi
                Article
                S2213-1582(21)00251-5 102807
                10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102807
                8416950
                34482280
                f5adcfc8-818f-4302-8355-10cb8cadc0b8
                © 2021 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 26 March 2021
                : 20 August 2021
                : 22 August 2021
                Categories
                Regular Article

                dopamine transporter,spect,controls,healthy controls
                dopamine transporter, spect, controls, healthy controls

                Comments

                Comment on this article