1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis and cognitive, emotional, and behavioral changes in rodents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There are previous epidemiological studies reporting associations between antibiotic use and psychiatric symptoms. Antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis and alteration of microbiota-gut-brain axis communication has been proposed to play a role in this association. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we reviewed published articles that have presented results on changes in cognition, emotion, and behavior in rodents (rats and mice) after antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis. We searched three databases—PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS to identify such articles using dedicated search strings and extracted data from 48 articles. Increase in anxiety and depression-like behavior was reported in 32.7 and 40.7 percent of the study-populations, respectively. Decrease in sociability, social novelty preference, recognition memory and spatial cognition was found in 18.1, 35.3, 26.1, and 62.5 percent of the study-populations, respectively. Only one bacterial taxon (increase in gut Proteobacteria) showed statistically significant association with behavioral changes (increase in anxiety). There were no consistent findings with statistical significance for the potential biomarkers [Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression in the hippocampus, serum corticosterone and circulating IL-6 and IL-1β levels]. Results of the meta-analysis revealed a significant association between symptoms of negative valence system (including anxiety and depression) and cognitive system (decreased spatial cognition) with antibiotic intake ( p < 0.05). However, between-study heterogeneity and publication bias were statistically significant ( p < 0.05). Risk of bias was evaluated to be high in the majority of the studies. We identified and discussed several reasons that could contribute to the heterogeneity between the results of the studies examined. The results of the meta-analysis provide promising evidence that there is indeed an association between antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis and psychopathologies. However, inconsistencies in the implemented methodologies make generalizing these results difficult. Gut microbiota depletion using antibiotics may be a useful strategy to evaluate if and how gut microbes influence cognition, emotion, and behavior, but the heterogeneity in methodologies used precludes any definitive interpretations for a translational impact on clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references106

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurosci
                Front Neurosci
                Front. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-4548
                1662-453X
                01 September 2023
                2023
                : 17
                : 1237177
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Biology, University of Nebraska at Omaha , Omaha, NE, United States
                [2] 2Callitrichid Research Center, University of Nebraska at Omaha , Omaha, NE, United States
                [3] 3Nebraska Food for Health Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln , Lincoln, NE, United States
                [4] 4Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph , Guelph, ON, Canada
                [5] 5Department of Psychiatry, University of Nebraska Medical Center , Omaha, NE, United States
                [6] 6Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln , Lincoln, NE, United States
                [7] 7Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center , Omaha, NE, United States
                [8] 8Primate Microbiome Project, University of Nebraska-Lincoln , Lincoln, NE, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: David Vauzour, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Avinash Veerappa, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States; Eleonore Fröhlich, Medical University of Graz, Austria

                *Correspondence: Jonathan B. Clayton, jclayton@ 123456unomaha.edu
                Article
                10.3389/fnins.2023.1237177
                10504664
                37719161
                f5b05ecd-c28a-4a83-ba78-39599a60778a
                Copyright © 2023 Hayer, Hwang and Clayton.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 09 June 2023
                : 18 August 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 8, Equations: 0, References: 107, Pages: 20, Words: 13117
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, doi 10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: K01OD030514
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                Gut-Brain Axis

                Neurosciences
                gut microbiota,behavior,anxiety,depression,social,antibiotics,anhedonia,microbiota-gut-brain axis

                Comments

                Comment on this article