5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hands-on Gross Anatomy Instruction Improves Clinical Imaging Skills Among Cardiovascular Fellows

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction:

          Multi-modality imaging is a crucial component of cardiovascular (CV) fellowship training and requires knowledge of CV anatomy for interpretation. We hypothesized that hands-on anatomy education would improve the imaging interpretation skills of CV fellows.

          Methods:

          The first-year CV fellowship class completed a hands-on cadaveric anatomy session correlated with clinical imaging. Fellows’ ability to identify CV structures on cardiac imaging was assessed using a 30-question assessment tool administered at baseline and 1 week and 6 months post intervention. Advanced CV fellows (second or third year) who had not attended the session were also tested. Scores were expressed as median [interquartile range].

          Results:

          Among 9 first-year fellows, the majority reported no formal anatomy training since medical school (N = 7) and rated their knowledge of CV anatomy as fair or poor (N = 7) prior to the intervention. The median assessment score was higher 1 week after intervention vs baseline (24 [23-25] vs 19 [17-21]; P = .013) and remained higher than baseline at 6 months (26 [26-28] vs 19 [17-21]; P = .009). The 6-month post-intervention score for first-year fellows was not significantly different than that of senior fellows (n = 10) not exposed to the intervention (26 [26-28] vs 26 [23-27]; P = .434).

          Conclusions:

          Gross anatomy instruction improved first-year CV fellows’ interpretation of CV imaging. Anatomic instruction may be a useful adjunct to multi-modality imaging education.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum.

          Anatomy in undergraduate education has been in decline for many years. Some suggest that it has fallen below a safe level. Balances between detail and safety, and assimilation and application of anatomy have yet to be established as the methods of teaching undergo another metamorphosis. For doctors, the human body is the focus of investigation and intervention on a daily basis; for this reason, the study of anatomy in some form will continue to be essential to safe medical practice. It is necessary for core knowledge of anatomy to be assimilated by all doctors in order to practice and communicate safely. It may be true that most doctors do not need to dissect a cadaver or study a prosection in order to practice, but if it can improve their understanding of what they do and why they do it, this surely has to be of benefit both for the safety of the patient and satisfaction of the doctor as a professional. Integration of newer teaching modalities and modern technology will encourage interest and retention of anatomical knowledge and its clinical relevance. Anatomy has a promising future in postgraduate specialist and surgical training. Detailed knowledge should be integrated into specialist training when it is clinically relevant allowing specialists of the future to practice safely and accurately and also to provide a strong base for future clinical developments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Are we teaching sufficient anatomy at medical school? The opinions of newly qualified doctors.

            In recent decades wide-ranging changes have occurred in medical school curricula. Time spent studying gross anatomy has declined amidst controversy as to how, what, and when teaching is best delivered. This reduced emphasis has led to concerns amongst clinicians that a new generation of doctors are leaving medical school with insufficient anatomical knowledge. Previous studies have established that medical students value their anatomy teaching during medical school. None have sought to establish views on the sufficiency of this teaching. We investigate the opinions of newly qualified doctors at a UK medical school and relate these opinions to career intentions and academic performance in the setting of a traditional dissection and prosection-based course. Overall nearly half of respondents believe they received insufficient anatomy teaching. A substantial proportion called for the integration of anatomy teaching throughout the medical school course. Trainees intent on pursuing a surgical career were more likely to believe anatomy teaching was insufficient than those pursuing a nonsurgical career; however, overall there was no statistical difference in relation to the mean for any individual career group. This study adds to the current debates in anatomical sciences education, indicating that overall, regardless of career intentions, new doctors perceive the need for greater emphasis on anatomical teaching. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              COCATS 4 Introduction

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Med Educ Curric Dev
                J Med Educ Curric Dev
                MDE
                spmde
                Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                2382-1205
                29 April 2019
                Jan-Dec 2019
                : 6
                : 2382120519842542
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
                [2 ]Cardiology Department, Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC, USA
                [3 ]Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
                Author notes
                [*]JM O’Leary, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. Email: jared.oleary@ 123456vumc.org
                Article
                10.1177_2382120519842542
                10.1177/2382120519842542
                6488777
                f5b681b4-e76b-4bef-bcdc-b19cb581809c
                © The Author(s) 2019

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 3 March 2019
                : 7 March 2019
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2019

                anatomy,cardiovascular fellowship,imaging
                anatomy, cardiovascular fellowship, imaging

                Comments

                Comment on this article