3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Influence of Temperament on the Acceptance of Two Conscious Sedation Techniques in Toddlers Undergoing Dental Treatment: A Randomised Cross Over Trial

      research-article
      1 , 1 , , 2
      Pain Research & Management
      Hindawi

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Pediatric dentists often find it challenging to handle pediatric patients due to their fear, unease, and anxiety toward dental procedures. To address this, sedation agents such as intranasal midazolam and nitrous oxide are commonly used as pharmacological behavior management methods. A child's temperament affects their behavior in unfamiliar settings.

          Aim

          To study the effect of child temperament on the acceptance of the nasal mask and intranasal drug administration in children undergoing dental treatment.

          Methods

          Thirty-two anxious children aged three to five were randomly assigned to two groups. During the first visit, one group received intranasal midazolam sedation, while the other group received nitrous oxide administered through a mask. On the subsequent visit, the groups crossed over. The parent assessed the child's temperament, and the acceptance of the sedation methods was recorded. The Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale (OSUBRS) was employed to assess behavior during the administration of local anesthesia. Statistical analysis was carried out using the chi-square test and Mann–Whitney U test ( p value <0.05).

          Results

          Children exhibited greater acceptance of the nasal mask compared to using the intranasal route for delivering midazolam during the induction process. A significant statistical influence of temperament was observed on the acceptance of the nasal mask and the intranasal atomisation device ( p value <0.05). The mean OSUBRS scores did not show any statistically significant differences between the sedation groups ( p = 0.14).

          Conclusion

          Most children demonstrated a more favorable acceptance of the nasal mask during the induction process; however, intranasal midazolam can serve as an effective alternative for anxious patients who struggle to keep the nitrous oxide mask on during the dental procedure. The adoption of these methods is influenced directly by the child's temperament.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sedation of children undergoing dental treatment.

          Children's fear about dental treatment may lead to behaviour management problems for the dentist, which can be a barrier to the successful dental treatment of children. Sedation can be used to relieve anxiety and manage behaviour in children undergoing dental treatment. There is a need to determine from published research which agents, dosages and regimens are effective. To evaluate the efficacy and relative efficacy of conscious sedation agents and dosages for behaviour management in paediatric dentistry. Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Dissertation Abstracts, SIGLE, the World Wide Web (Google) and the Community of Science Database were conducted for relevant trials and references up to 4th August 2011. Reference lists from relevant articles were scanned and the authors contacted to identify trials and obtain additional information. There were no language restrictions. Trials pre-1966 were not searched. Studies were selected if they met the following criteria: randomised controlled trials of conscious sedation comparing two or more drugs/techniques/placebo undertaken by the dentist or one of the dental team in children up to 16 years of age. Crossover trials were excluded. Information regarding methods, participants, interventions, outcome measures and results were independently extracted, in duplicate, by two review authors. Where information in trial reports was unclear or incomplete authors of trials were contacted. Trials were assessed for risk of bias. The Cochrane Collaboration statistical guidelines were followed. Thirty-six studies were included with a total of 2810 participants. Thirty trials (83%) were at high risk of bias and six (17%) were at unclear risk of bias. There were 28 different sedatives used with or without inhalational nitrous oxide. Dosages, mode of administration and time of administration varied widely. Trials were grouped into placebo-controlled, dosage and head-to-head comparisons. Meta-analysis of the available data was possible for studies investigating oral midazolam vs placebo only. There is weak evidence from five small clinically heterogeneous trials at high risk of bias, that the use of oral midazolam in doses between 0.25 mg/kg to 0.75 mg/kg is associated with more co-operative behaviour compared to placebo; standardised mean difference (SMD) favoured midazolam (SMD 2.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.58 to 4.37, P < 0.001, I² = 91%), which translates to an increase of approximately 1.8 points on the six-point Houpt behaviour scale. There is very weak evidence from two trials which could not be pooled that inhalational nitrous oxide is more effective than placebo. There is some weak evidence that oral midazolam is an effective sedative agent for children undergoing dental treatment. There is very weak evidence that nitrous oxide inhalation may also be effective. There is a need for further well designed and well reported clinical trials to evaluate other potential sedation agents. Further recommendations for future research are described and it is suggested that future trials evaluate experimental regimens in comparison with oral midazolam or inhaled nitrous oxide.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Current methods of sedation in dental patients - a systematic review of the literature

            Objetive The main objective of this systematic literature review is to identify the safest and most effective sedative drugs so as to ensure successful sedation with as few complications as possible. Study Design A systematic literature review of the PubMed MEDLINE database was carried out using the key words “conscious sedation,” “drugs,” and “dentistry.” A total of 1,827 scientific articles were found, and these were narrowed down to 473 articles after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. These 473 studies were then individually assessed for their suitability for inclusion in this literature review. Results A total of 21 studies were selected due to their rigorous study design and conduciveness to further, more exhaustive analysis. The selected studies included a total of 1,0003 patients classified as ASA I or II. Midazolam was the drug most frequently used for successful sedation in dental surgical procedures. Ketamine also proved very useful when administered intranasally, although some side effects were observed when delivered via other routes of administration. Both propofol and nitrous oxide (N2O) are also effective sedative drugs. Conclusions Midazolam is the drug most commonly used to induce moderate sedation in dental surgical procedures, and it is also very safe. Other sedative drugs like ketamine, dexmedetomidine and propofol have also been proven safe and effective; however, further comparative clinical studies are needed to better demonstrate which of these are the safest and most effective. Key words:Conscious sedation, drugs, dentistry.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Kaplan and Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry, 10th edition

              The current edition of “Synopsis of Psychiatry” is the third in this series (the eighth edition being the first) to adorn my bookshelf, and like the previous ones, does adequate justice to the expectations of the mental health fraternity. The purpose of this series is clearly spelt out: To provide a condensed and a more “manageable” version of the much more voluminous “Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry” by the same editors. This purpose has been undoubtedly accomplished. The width of coverage has not been compromised for the sake of brevity. The opening chapter deals effectively with the most important aspect of psychiatry: The patient-doctor relationship. Subsequent sections deal with basic neurosciences and psychosocial sciences. The newly added chapter on neurogenetics is lucidly written and useful. The chapters on various psychiatric disorders follow the pattern of previous editions: Evolution of the concept, epidemiology, etiology, diagnostic and clinical features, differential diagnosis and management. Well-chosen case vignettes add to the understanding of various disorders. The ICD-10 diagnostic criteria (which are used more commonly in our country) deserved a more prominent place (vis a vis the DSM-IV-TR criteria) rather than a passing mention at the tail-end of each chapter. Throughout the text, Tables, Figures and photos have been freely used to enhance understanding as well as interest of the readers. However, some of the color plates are out of place. For example, the plate depicting brain regions involved in mood disorders is placed in the chapter on schizophrenia. A new chapter on “Psychiatric emergencies in children” has been added in the section of psychiatric emergencies. Well in keeping with the recent advances, the chapters on genetic counseling and dialectical behavior therapy have been welcome additions to the psychotherapy section. Interpersonal therapy, which formed a part of the chapter on brief psychotherapy in the previous edition, has been dealt with separately, laying special emphasis on delivering the therapy in a group format. The section on psychopharmacology incorporates all new molecules that have been approved for treatment of various psychiatric conditions-newer anticonvulsants, phosphodiasterase-5 inhibitors, memantine and so on. A chapter on “other methods of brain stimulation” has been added. In this chapter, only the section on deep brain stimulation is new whereas several other therapeutic modalities of historical interest like insulin coma therapy have been deleted. Arrangement of drugs based on their mechanisms of action rather than their indications is one of the best features of this book, because, with the advent of latest research, newer indications of older molecules keep emerging. One of the major additions in the child psychiatry section is the chapter on “childhood anxiety disorders” and impact of terrorism on children. Both are lucid, well-written and up to date. Another important addition in the chapter of end of life care includes a section on physician-assisted suicide. However, this section does not provide much additional information in comparison with the previous edition. In the chapters dealing with major psychiatric disorders, treatment algorithms (as per available guidelines) could have been included. In this era of evidence-based medicine, a chapter on evidence-based psychiatry is conspicuous by its absence. In an effort to keep up with massive advances in the field of biological psychiatry without increasing the volume of the text, several areas related to conceptual evolution of psychiatric disorders (especially, psychosocial perspectives) have taken a back seat. This is unfortunate, not only because it narrows the perspective of the psychiatry residents but also may pose difficulty in exams as questions from these areas are frequently asked. Overall, this book is worth the money and a must in the bookshelves of all mental health trainees and professionals. Undergraduate medical students may, however, find the book a little difficult to comprehend.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Pain Res Manag
                Pain Res Manag
                PRM
                Pain Research & Management
                Hindawi
                1203-6765
                1918-1523
                2023
                22 August 2023
                : 2023
                : 6655628
                Affiliations
                1Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India
                2Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore 524003, Andhra Pradesh, India
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Massimiliano Valeriani

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4957-3083
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6014-946X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1204-5551
                Article
                10.1155/2023/6655628
                10465248
                37649959
                f6afa282-bd8a-4a9f-b2fc-dee95c995b4d
                Copyright © 2023 Palak Janiani et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 1 June 2023
                : 11 July 2023
                : 5 August 2023
                Categories
                Research Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article