3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Influence of cannabis use on incidence of psychosis in people at clinical high risk

      research-article
      , MPharm 1 , * , , PhD 2 , , PhD 1 , , MD 1 , , PhD 1 , 3 , , PhD 1 , 4 , , MSc 1 , , PhD 5 , , PhD 6 , 7 , , PhD 8 , 9 , , PhD 10 , 11 , , PhD 10 , 11 , , PhD 10 , 11 , , PhD 12 , , PhD 13 , , PhD 14 , , PhD 15 , , PhD 16 , , DMSc 17 , , PhD 18 , , PhD 19 , , PhD 20 , , PhD 1 , 3
      Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences
      clinical high-risk, longitudinal, psychotic disorders, substance use, THC

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          Evidence for case–control studies suggests that cannabis use is a risk factor for the development of psychosis. However, there have been limited prospective studies and the direction of this association remains controversial. The primary aim of the present study was to examine the association between cannabis use and the incidence of psychotic disorders in people at clinical high risk of psychosis. Secondary aims were to assess associations between cannabis use and the persistence of psychotic symptoms, and with functional outcome.

          Methods

          Current and previous cannabis use were assessed in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis ( n = 334) and healthy controls ( n = 67), using a modified version of the Cannabis Experience Questionnaire. Participants were assessed at baseline and followed up for 2 years. Transition to psychosis and persistence of psychotic symptoms were assessed using the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States criteria. Level of functioning at follow up was assessed using the Global Assessment of Functioning disability scale.

          Results

          During follow up, 16.2% of the clinical high-risk sample developed psychosis. Of those who did not become psychotic, 51.4% had persistent symptoms and 48.6% were in remission. There was no significant association between any measure of cannabis use at baseline and either transition to psychosis, the persistence of symptoms, or functional outcome.

          Conclusions

          These findings contrast with epidemiological data that suggest that cannabis use increases the risk of psychotic disorder.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Composite International Diagnostic Interview. An epidemiologic Instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures.

          The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), written at the request of the World Health Organization/US Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration Task Force on Psychiatric Assessment Instruments, combines questions from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule with questions designed to elicit Present State Examination items. It is fully structured to allow administration by lay interviewers and scoring of diagnoses by computer. A special Substance Abuse Module covers tobacco, alcohol, and other drug abuse in considerable detail, allowing the assessment of the quality and severity of dependence and its course. This article describes the design and development of the CIDI and the current field testing of a slightly reduced "core" version. The field test is being conducted in 19 centers around the world to assess the interviews' reliability and its acceptability to clinicians and the general populace in different cultures and to provide data on which to base revisions that may be found necessary. In addition, questions to assess International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, and the revised DSM-III diagnoses are being written. If all goes well, the CIDI will allow investigators reliably to assess mental disorders according to the most widely accepted nomenclatures in many different populations and cultures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The self-medication hypothesis of substance use disorders: a reconsideration and recent applications.

            The self-medication hypothesis of addictive disorders derives primarily from clinical observations of patients with substance use disorders. Individuals discover that the specific actions or effects of each class of drugs relieve or change a range of painful affect states. Self-medication factors occur in a context of self-regulation vulnerabilities--primarily difficulties in regulating affects, self-esteem, relationships, and self-care. Persons with substance use disorders suffer in the extreme with their feelings, either being overwhelmed with painful affects or seeming not to feel their emotions at all. Substances of abuse help such individuals to relieve painful affects or to experience or control emotions when they are absent or confusing. Diagnostic studies provide evidence that variously supports and fails to support a self-medication hypothesis of addictive disorders. The cause-consequence controversy involving psychopathology and substance use/abuse is reviewed and critiqued. In contrast, clinical observations and empirical studies that focus on painful affects and subjective states of distress more consistently suggest that such states of suffering are important psychological determinants in using, becoming dependent upon, and relapsing to addictive substances. Subjective states of distress and suffering involved in motives to self-medicate with substances of abuse are considered with respect to nicotine dependence and to schizophrenia and posttraumatic stress disorder comorbid with a substance use disorder.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The self-medication hypothesis of addictive disorders: focus on heroin and cocaine dependence.

              Recent clinical observations and psychiatric diagnostic findings of drug-dependent individuals suggest that they are predisposed to addiction because they suffer with painful affect states and related psychiatric disorders. The drugs that addicts select are not chosen randomly. Their drug of choice is the result of an interaction between the psychopharmacologic action of the drug and the dominant painful feelings with which they struggle. Narcotic addicts prefer opiates because of their powerful muting action on the disorganizing and threatening affects of rage and aggression. Cocaine has its appeal because of its ability to relieve distress associated with depression, hypomania, and hyperactivity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9513551
                Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
                Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
                Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences
                1323-1316
                1440-1819
                01 September 2023
                13 May 2023
                19 January 2024
                29 January 2024
                : 77
                : 9
                : 469-477
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
                [3 ]Department of Psychiatry, Oxford University, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
                [4 ]Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
                [5 ]Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
                [6 ]Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Department of Clinical Psychology and EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [7 ]Department of Psychosis Research, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands
                [8 ]Department Early Psychosis, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [9 ]Arkin Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [10 ]Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
                [11 ]Orygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
                [12 ]Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
                [13 ]Department of Psychology, Division of Personality and Developmental Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
                [14 ]LiNC—Lab Interdisciplinar Neurociências Clínicas, Depto Psiquiatria, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – UNIFESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
                [15 ]Departament de Psicologia Clínica i de la Salut, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Fundació, Sanitària Sant Pere Claver (Spain), Spanish Mental Health Research Network (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain
                [16 ]Hôpital Sainte-Anne, C’JAAD, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire, Inserm U894, Institut de Psychiatrie (CNRS 3557), University Paris Descartes, Paris, France
                [17 ]Centre for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CNSR) & Centre for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research (CINS), Mental Health Centre Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark
                [18 ]Mental Health Center Copenhagen and Center for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, Mental Health Center Glostrup, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
                [19 ]Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
                [20 ]Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: lucy.chester@ 123456kcl.ac.uk

                EU-GEI collaborators and their affiliations are listed in the Acknowledgments section.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7813-0281
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6099-8464
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3541-9947
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2851-5252
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8920-3407
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0543-4516
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7987-6619
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3525-6415
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-7926
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6263-2332
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3789-6168
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8969-4595
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6361-8789
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4233-0182
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0868-4449
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-1238
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4715-9890
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3056-7262
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4895-7023
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-2364
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8359-9877
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4381-0532
                Article
                EMS193516
                10.1111/pcn.13555
                7615575
                37070555
                f6c9da3c-6b5d-44c9-a4e6-f55593903321

                This work is licensed under a BY 4.0 International license.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                clinical high-risk,longitudinal,psychotic disorders,substance use,thc

                Comments

                Comment on this article