4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of Different Strategies to Measure Medication Adherence via Claims Data in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Medication adherence correlates with morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure ( CHF), but is difficult to assess. We conducted a retrospective methodological cohort study in 3,808 CHF patients, calculating adherence as proportion of days covered ( PDC) utilizing claims data from 2010 to 2015. We aimed to compare different parameters’ influence on the PDC of elderly CHF patients exemplifying a complex chronic disease. Investigated parameters were the assumed prescribed daily dose ( PDD), stockpiling, and periods of hospital stay. Thereby, we investigated a new approach using the PDD assigned to different percentiles. The different dose assumptions had the biggest influence on the PDC, with variations from 41.9% to 83.7%. Stockpiling and hospital stays increased the values slightly. These results queries that a reliable PDC can be calculated with an assumed PDD. Hence, results based on an assumed PDD have to be interpreted carefully and should be presented with sensitivity analyses to show the PDC's possible range.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Epidemiology and one-year outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved, mid-range and reduced ejection fraction: an analysis of the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry.

          The objectives of the present study were to describe epidemiology and outcomes in ambulatory heart failure (HF) patients stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and to identify predictors for mortality at 1 year in each group.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Epidemiology of heart failure: the prevalence of heart failure and ventricular dysfunction in older adults over time. A systematic review.

            The 'epidemic' of heart failure seems to be changing, but precise prevalence estimates of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) in older adults, based on adequate echocardiographic assessment, are scarce. Systematic reviews including recent studies on the prevalence of heart failure and LVD are lacking. We aimed to assess the trends in the prevalence of LVD, and heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in the older population at large. A systematic electronic search of the databases Medline and Embase was performed. Studies that reported prevalence estimates in community-dwelling people ≥60 years old were included if echocardiography was used to establish the diagnosis. In total, 28 articles from 25 different study populations were included. The median prevalence of systolic and 'isolated' diastolic LVD was 5.5% (range 3.3-9.2%) and 36.0% (range 15.8-52.8%), respectively. A peak in systolic dysfunction prevalence seems to have occurred between 1995 and 2000. 'All type' heart failure had a median prevalence rate of 11.8% (range 4.7-13.3%), with fairly stable rates in the last decade and with HFpEF being more common than HFrEF [median prevalence 4.9% (range 3.8-7.4%) and 3.3% (range 2.4-5.8%), respectively]. Both LVD and heart failure remain common in the older population at large. The prevalence of diastolic dysfunction is on the rise and currently higher than that of systolic dysfunction. The prevalence of the latter seems to have decreased in the 21st century.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A checklist for medication compliance and persistence studies using retrospective databases.

              The increasing number of retrospective database studies related to medication compliance and persistence (C&P), and the inherent variability within each, has created a need for improvement in the quality and consistency of medication C&P research. This article stems from the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) efforts to develop a checklist of items that should be either included, or at least considered, when a retrospective database analysis of medication compliance or persistence is undertaken. This consensus document outlines a systematic approach to designing or reviewing retrospective database studies of medication C&P. Included in this article are discussions on data sources, measures of C&P, results reporting, and even conflict of interests. If followed, this checklist should improve the consistency and quality of C&P analyses, which in turn will help providers and payers understand the impact of C&P on health outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                m.schulz@abda.de
                Journal
                Clin Pharmacol Ther
                Clin. Pharmacol. Ther
                10.1002/(ISSN)1532-6535
                CPT
                Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0009-9236
                1532-6535
                12 March 2019
                July 2019
                12 March 2019
                : 106
                : 1 , Real‐World Data: Real‐World Evidence ( doiID: 10.1002/cpt.2019.106.issue-1 )
                : 211-218
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] PMV research group Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne University of Cologne Cologne Germany
                [ 2 ] Department of Medicine ABDA – Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists Berlin Germany
                [ 3 ] Department of Cardiology University Hospital Leipzig University Leipzig Germany
                [ 4 ] Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry Institute of Pharmacy Freie Universität Berlin Berlin Germany
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence: Martin Schulz ( m.schulz@ 123456abda.de )
                Article
                CPT1378
                10.1002/cpt.1378
                6617982
                30697693
                f6fa26bc-f80e-4978-bc69-f74b0396546c
                © 2019 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 30 August 2018
                : 08 January 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Pages: 8, Words: 6768
                Categories
                Article
                Research
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                cpt1378
                July 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.5 mode:remove_FC converted:10.07.2019

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article