25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      An early appointment to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation at hospital discharge improves attendance at orientation: a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial.

      Circulation
      Aged, Appointments and Schedules, Exercise Therapy, Female, Heart Diseases, rehabilitation, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Outpatients, Patient Discharge, statistics & numerical data, Patient Participation, Single-Blind Method, United States

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) decreases mortality rates but is underutilized. Current median time from hospital discharge to enrollment is 35 days. We hypothesized that an appointment within 10 days would improve attendance at CR orientation. At hospital discharge, 148 patients with a nonsurgical qualifying diagnosis for CR were randomized to receive a CR orientation appointment either within 10 days (early) or at 35 days (standard). The primary end point was attendance at CR orientation. Secondary outcome measures were attendance at ≥1 exercise session, the total number of exercise sessions attended, completion of CR, and change in exercise training workload while in CR. Average age was 60±12 years; 56% of participants were male and 49% were black, with balanced baseline characteristics between groups. Median time (95% confidence interval) to orientation was 8.5 (7-13) versus 42 (35 to NA [not applicable]) days for the early and standard appointment groups, respectively (P<0.001). Attendance rates at the orientation session were 77% (57/74) versus 59% (44/74) in the early and standard appointment groups, respectively, which demonstrates a significant 18% absolute and 56% relative improvement (relative risk, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.37; P=0.022). The number needed to treat was 5.7. There was no difference (P>0.05) in any of the secondary outcome measures, but statistical power for these end points was low. Safety analysis demonstrated no difference between groups in CR-related adverse events. Early appointments for CR significantly improve attendance at orientation. This simple technique could potentially increase initial CR participation nationwide. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01596036.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article