14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Strengthening mental health systems in Zambia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Studies in mental health care for low resource settings indicate that providing services at primary care level would significantly improve provision and utilisation of mental health services. Challenges related to inadequate funding were noted as significant barriers to service provision, with the contribution of low knowledge of mental health conditions and stigma in the community. This study aimed to explore the barriers to the use of mental health services in Zambia, suggesting health systems thinking approaches to solving these challenges.

          Methods

          Primary data were collected through individual interviews from 12 participants; primary caregivers, health workers from public health institutions that treat mental health conditions and policymakers and implementers. The digitally recorded responses were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.

          Results

          Key barriers to care included inadequate funding, few human resources, poor infrastructure and stigma. Barriers to care at policy, facility and individual or community level could be alleviated by strengthening the mental health system. Engagement of community health workers and increasing efforts to sensitise the community about mental health would prove beneficial.

          Conclusions

          Strengthening the community health systems for mental health could improve access and increase utilisation of services.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries

          Egon Guba (1981)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mental health systems in countries: where are we now?

            More than 85% of the world's population lives in 153 low-income and middle-income countries (LAMICs). Although country-level information on mental health systems has recently become available, it still has substantial gaps and inconsistencies. Most of these countries allocate very scarce financial resources and have grossly inadequate manpower and infrastructure for mental health. Many LAMICs also lack mental health policy and legislation to direct their mental health programmes and services, which is of particular concern in Africa and South East Asia. Different components of mental health systems seem to vary greatly, even in the same-income categories, with some countries having developed their mental health system despite their low-income levels. These examples need careful scrutiny to derive useful lessons. Furthermore, mental health resources in countries seem to be related as much to measures of general health as to economic and developmental indicators, arguing for improved prioritisation for mental health even in low-resource settings. Increased emphasis on mental health, improved resources, and enhanced monitoring of the situation in countries is called for to advance global mental health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Discharged from a mental health admission ward: is it safe to go home? A review on the negative outcomes of psychiatric hospitalization

              Before psychiatry emerged as a medical discipline, hospitalizing individuals with mental disorders was more of a social stigmatizing act than a therapeutic act. After the birth of the mental health disciplines, psychiatric hospitalization was legitimized and has proven to be indispensable, preventing suicides and helping individuals in need. However, despite more than a century passing since this legitimization occurred, psychiatric hospitalization remains a controversial issue. There is the question of possible negative outcomes after a psychiatric admission ceases to take its protective effect, and even of whether the psychiatric admission itself is related to a negative setback after discharge. This review aims to summarize some of the most important negative outcomes after discharge from a psychiatric institution. These experiences were organized into two groups: those after a brief psychiatric hospitalization, and those after a long-stay admission. The author further suggests possible ways to minimize these adversities, emphasizing the need of awareness related to this important issue.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                margaratemuna@yahoo.com
                Journal
                Int J Ment Health Syst
                Int J Ment Health Syst
                International Journal of Mental Health Systems
                BioMed Central (London )
                1752-4458
                16 April 2020
                16 April 2020
                2020
                : 14
                : 28
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.12984.36, ISNI 0000 0000 8914 5257, Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, , University of Zambia, ; Lusaka, Zambia
                [2 ]GRID grid.12984.36, ISNI 0000 0000 8914 5257, Strategic Centre for Health Systems Metrics & Evaluations (SCHEME), Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, , University of Zambia, ; Lusaka, Zambia
                Article
                360
                10.1186/s13033-020-00360-z
                7161303
                32322298
                f7fa5838-a7d6-4ce5-ac1a-1bf75a2ddcb5
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 17 September 2019
                : 4 April 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Neurology
                mental health,mental health systems,mental health services,barriers to service use
                Neurology
                mental health, mental health systems, mental health services, barriers to service use

                Comments

                Comment on this article