Identification and field evaluation of the sex pheromone of a Brazilian population of Spodoptera cosmioides

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this work was to identify the sex pheromone of Spodoptera cosmioides and to evaluate whether there is pheromone cross-attraction in Spodoptera sp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Spodoptera cosmioides gland extracts were analyzed by GC-FID and GC-MS. Wind tunnel and electrophysiology experiments were conducted to evaluate the role of gland compounds. In the field, different pheromone traps were tested: S. frugiperda commercial lure; (9Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate (Z9-14:OAc) and (9Z,12E)-9,12-tetradecadienyl acetate (Z9,E12-14:OAc) trap; two females of S. cosmioides trap; and hexane control trap. Four acetates were identified in the S. cosmioides female gland extracts as Z9-14:OAc, Z9,E12-14:OAc, (11Z)-11-hexadecenyl acetate (Z11-16:OAc) and hexadecyl acetate (16:OAc), but only the first two acetates induced electrophysiological responses from S. cosmioides male antennae. In wind tunnel experiments, S. cosmioides and S. frugiperda males responded more strongly to conspecific blends; however, there was some cross-attraction, as 47% males of S. frugiperda and 25% males of S. cosmioides responded to heterospecific blends. In field experiments, S. frugiperda and S. cosmioides showed the same response pattern as observed in the wind tunnel bioassays. In summary, the sex pheromone components of S. cosmioides are Z9-14:OAc and Z9,E12-14OAc; they are important for conferring species specificity, and there is pheromone-mediated cross attraction between S. frugiperda and S. cosmioides.

Translated abstract

Resumo: O objetivo deste trabalho foi identificar o feromônio sexual de Spodoptera cosmioides e avaliar se existe atração cruzada em Spodoptera sp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Extratos de glândulas de S. cosmioides foram analisados por GC-FID e GC-MS. A ação dos compostos encontrados nas glândulas foi avaliada por meio de bioensaios em túnel de vento e eletrofisiologia. Em campo, testaram-se diferentes armadilhas feromonais: com feromônio comercial de S. frugiperda; com acetato de (9Z)-9-tetradecenila (Z9-14:OAc) e acetato de (9Z,12E)-9,12-tetradecadienila (Z9,E12-14:OAc); com duas fêmeas de S. cosmioides; e controle com hexano. Quatro acetatos foram identificados nas glândulas de fêmeas de S. cosmioides como Z9-14:OAc, Z9,E12-14:OAc, (11Z)-acetato de hexadecenila e acetato de hexadecila (16:OAc), mas somente os dois primeiros acetatos induziram resposta eletrofisiológica nas antenas de machos de S. cosmioides. Nos bioensaios em túnel de vento, machos de S. cosmioides e S. frugiperda responderam em maior número à mistura de coespecíficos; no entanto, houve atração cruzada, uma vez que 47% dos machos de S. frugiperda e 25% dos machos de S. cosmioides responderam à mistura heteroespecífica. Nos experimentos em campo, S. frugiperda e S. cosmioides mostraram o mesmo padrão de resposta observado nos bioensaios em túnel de vento. Em resumo, os componentes do feromônio sexual de S. cosmioides são Z9-14:OAc e Z9,E12-14:OAc, que são importantes para conferir espécie-especificidade do feromônio, e há atração cruzada entre S. cosmioides e S. frugiperda mediada por feromônios.

Related collections

Most cited references 27

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Host strain specific sex pheromone variation in Spodoptera frugiperda

Astrid Groot, Melanie Marr, Gerhard Schöfl … (2009)

Background The fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) consists of two distinct strains with different host plant preferences for corn and rice. To assess whether pheromonal-mediated behavioral isolation accompanies the habitat isolation on different host plants, we compared the sex pheromone composition among females of the two strains. Pheromone glands were extracted with or without injection of pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide (PBAN). To assess the mode of inheritance of this variation, we also analyzed the pheromone composition of F1 hybrid females. Results Relative to intra-strain variation, the pheromone composition of the two strains differed significantly. Corn strain females contained significantly more of the second most abundant pheromone compound Z11-16:Ac (m), and significantly less of most other compounds, than rice strain females. When females were injected with PBAN before their glands were extracted, the differences between the strains were less pronounced but still statistically significant. The pheromone composition of hybrid females showed a maternal inheritance of the major component Z9-14:Ac (M) as well as of Z11-16:Ac (m). Most other compounds showed an inheritance indicating genetic dominance of the corn strain. The within-strain phenotypic correlations among the various components were consistent with their hypothesized biosynthetic pathway, and between-strain differences in the correlation structure suggested candidate genes that may explain the pheromone differences between the two strains. These include Δ9- and Δ11 desaturases, and possibly also a Δ7-desaturase, although the latter has not been identified in insects so far. Conclusion The two host strains of S. frugiperda produce systematically differing female sex pheromone blends. Previously-documented geographic variation in the sexual communication of this species did not take strain identity into account, and thus may be partly explained by different strain occurrence in different regions. The finding of pheromone differences reinforces the possibility of incipient reproductive isolation among these strains, previously shown to differ in the timing of nocturnal mating activity and host plant use. Finding the genetic basis of the pheromone differences, as well as these other biological traits, will help to elucidate the role of premating isolation in the continuing differentiation of these two strains that may eventually lead to speciation.