3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Glycemic Control, Preexisting Cardiovascular Disease, and Risk of Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review With Meta‐Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcome Trials and Intensive Glucose Control Trials

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The value of glycemic control and preexisting cardiovascular disease in determining the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) in type 2 diabetes mellitus is uncertain. Intensive glucose control trials suggest that the 9% lower risk of MACE associated with intensive glycemic control, as compared with conventional glycemic control, is only driven by patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without cardiovascular disease at baseline.

          Methods and Results

          We did a meta‐analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials dividing patients with or without preexisting cardiovascular disease; we found that the lower risk of MACE is confined to patients with cardiovascular disease at baseline. Compared with placebo, the use of both glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors was associated with a significant 14% lower MACE risk in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease and with a nonsignificant 2% higher MACE risk in those without preexisting cardiovascular disease ( P for interaction=0.021). The meta‐regression analysis of all 12 trials demonstrated a significant ( P=0.002) association between reductions of glycated hemoglobin in glycated hemoglobin A 1C. Accordingly, the reduction of MACE expected if all cardiovascular outcome trials had achieved a 0.9% glycated hemoglobin reduction would have been 33%. Routine clinical care data complement the results of cardiovascular outcome trials but with some differences: the lower risk of MACE with sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitor use is evident in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without preexisting cardiovascular disease.

          Conclusions

          Sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists should be included in the therapeutic plan of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and overt cardiovascular disease, with due attention paid to improvement of glycemic control, which may amplify their benefit on MACE.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.

          The cardiovascular effects of adding once-weekly treatment with exenatide to usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes are unknown.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial

            Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists differ in chemical structure, duration of action, and in their effects on clinical outcomes. The cardiovascular effects of once-weekly albiglutide in type 2 diabetes are unknown. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of albiglutide in preventing cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              SGLT2 inhibitors and mechanisms of cardiovascular benefit: a state-of-the-art review

              Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT)2 inhibitors have been demonstrated to reduce cardiovascular events, particularly heart failure, in cardiovascular outcome trials. Here, we review the proposed mechanistic underpinnings of this benefit. Specifically, we focus on the role of SGLT2 inhibitors in optimising ventricular loading conditions through their effect on diuresis and natriuresis, in addition to reducing afterload and improving vascular structure and function. Further insights into the role of SGLT2 inhibition in myocardial metabolism and substrate utilisation are outlined. Finally, we discuss two emerging themes: how SGLT2 inhibitors may regulate Na+/H+ exchange at the level of the heart and kidney and how they may modulate adipokine production. The mechanistic discussion is placed in the context of completed and ongoing trials of SGLT2 inhibitors in the prevention and treatment of heart failure in individuals with and without diabetes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dario.giugliano@unicampania.it
                Journal
                J Am Heart Assoc
                J Am Heart Assoc
                10.1002/(ISSN)2047-9980
                JAH3
                ahaoa
                Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2047-9980
                05 June 2019
                18 June 2019
                : 8
                : 12 ( doiID: 10.1002/jah3.2019.8.issue-12 )
                : e012356
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli Naples Italy
                [ 2 ] Diabetes Unit Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli Naples Italy
                [ 3 ] Medical Statistics Unit Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli Naples Italy
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: Dario Giugliano, MD, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Piazza L. Miraglia, 80138 Naples, Italy. E‐mail: dario.giugliano@ 123456unicampania.it
                Article
                JAH34153
                10.1161/JAHA.119.012356
                6645638
                31166153
                f9dce99f-ddc6-40ef-af08-b1ac54d5bdc9
                © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 15 February 2019
                : 01 May 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Pages: 10, Words: 7841
                Funding
                Funded by: Associazione Salute con Stile
                Funded by: Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences
                Categories
                Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
                Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                jah34153
                18 June 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.4 mode:remove_FC converted:18.06.2019

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                cardiovascular events,cardiovascular outcome trial,intensive glucose control,type 2 diabetes mellitus,metabolism,vascular disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article