0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Canephron N in Comparison to Ciprofloxacin in the Prevention of Postoperative Lower Urinary Tract Infections after Midurethral Sling Surgery

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common reasons for antibiotic prescriptions among women worldwide. UTIs are also associated with intra- and postoperative catheterization, which is an essential component of many gynecological surgical procedures, including midurethral sling (MUS) placement. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of UTI subsequent to a MUS procedure. The study involved 562 female patients who underwent MUS procedures due to stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to two study groups: patients receiving 500 mg of ciprofloxacin three times a day for 3 consecutive days after surgery or patients receiving 5 mL of Canephron taken orally three times a day for 3 weeks. After analyzing the collected data, it was found that in the group of patients receiving ciprofloxacin, 29 women (10.98%) had a UTI, whereas in the group of patients receiving Canephron, 36 women (13.64%) had a UTI within 6 months after the patient’s MUS procedure. No statistically significant difference between the two groups was noted. Postoperative prophylaxis with a phytodrug can be perceived as an attractive option in the reduction of antibiotic consumption among female patients after a MUS procedure.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

          G*Power (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996) was designed as a general stand-alone power analysis program for statistical tests commonly used in social and behavioral research. G*Power 3 is a major extension of, and improvement over, the previous versions. It runs on widely used computer platforms (i.e., Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Mac OS X 10.4) and covers many different statistical tests of the t, F, and chi2 test families. In addition, it includes power analyses for z tests and some exact tests. G*Power 3 provides improved effect size calculators and graphic options, supports both distribution-based and design-based input modes, and offers all types of power analyses in which users might be interested. Like its predecessors, G*Power 3 is free.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Urinary tract infection syndromes: occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden.

            Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections, accounting for 0.9% of all ambulatory visits in the United States. This review defines the major UTI syndromes, their occurrence and recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women

              To design and validate a condition-specific quality of life questionnaire for the assessment of women with urinary incontinence, and to use the questionnaire to assess the quality of life of women with specific urodynamic diagnoses.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                22 October 2020
                November 2020
                : 9
                : 11
                : 3391
                Affiliations
                [1 ]2nd Department of Gynecology, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-954 Lublin, Poland; ewarechberger92@ 123456gmail.com (E.R.); rechbergt@ 123456yahoo.com (T.R.); sara.wawrysiuk@ 123456gmail.com (S.W.); wrobelandrzej@ 123456yahoo.com (A.W.)
                [2 ]Department of Paediatric Propedeutics, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Lublin, ul. A. Gebali 9, 20-091 Lublin, Poland; brechberger@ 123456interia.pl
                [3 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, Am Krankenhaus 5, 24211 Preetz, Germany; a.kuszka@ 123456klinik-preetz.de
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: pmiotla@ 123456wp.pl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3466-2478
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1902-6484
                Article
                jcm-09-03391
                10.3390/jcm9113391
                7690611
                33105885
                f9faacad-3d64-4846-9b0d-cb8f43b0f349
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 19 September 2020
                : 19 October 2020
                Categories
                Article

                urinary tract infection,prophylaxis,midurethral sling,ciprofloxacin,phytodrug

                Comments

                Comment on this article