20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Opportunities in the Acute Care Setting for Infectious Diseases/Hospitalist Patient Co-Management

      abstract
      , DO 1 , , MD 2 , , MD 3 , , MD 4
      Open Forum Infectious Diseases
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In an inpatient setting, Infectious Diseases (ID) physician care may lead to lower mortality rates and readmissions. When consultation is performed earlier in the admission, outcomes may even be better. The model of individual consultative care that relies on primary services calling specialists to give recommendations can lead to missed opportunities for optimal diagnostic testing and antimicrobial utilization. Having ID specialists involved in the care of the hospitalized patient from the time of admission creates a unique opportunity for timely intervention that could have long-ranging effects.

          Methods

          Patients admitted to four of the non-teaching hospitalist services at Geisinger Medical Center over two separate weeks included automatic ID evaluation within 24 hours of admission. The ID physician reviewed the chart and records of each admission to determine whether the patient was being treated for an infection. Any potential ID-related interventions identified upon initial evaluation were recorded by the ID physician. Patients were excluded if formal ID consultation was requested.

          Results

          A total of 85 patients were admitted during the study and 84 were included for review. Forty-five (53.6%) were admitted for a total of 48 infection-related reasons and another 17 (20.2%) were found to have incidental infection-related findings. Seven patients had requests for formal ID consultation placed (8.3%). Of the remaining primary ID diagnoses on admission, 33 were accurate by ID physician assessment (68.8%) and empiric therapy was appropriate in 29 (60.4%). Of the incidental infection-related diagnoses, 12 (70.5%) were considered accurate and empiric therapy was appropriate in 12 (70.5%). Among primary ID diagnoses, 60 diagnostic testing opportunities and 25 potential therapeutic improvements were identified (Figures).

          Conclusion

          Despite the limitations of relying on medical records alone, when done in real time, a large number of opportunities exist to optimize diagnostic testing and antimicrobial use in the acute care setting. As healthcare moves away from fee-for-service models to population health, the concept of an ID physician/hospitalist co-management model of inpatient care should be explored further.

          Figures
          Disclosures

          All authors: No reported disclosures.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          ofid
          Open Forum Infectious Diseases
          Oxford University Press (US )
          2328-8957
          Fall 2017
          04 October 2017
          04 October 2017
          : 4
          : Suppl 1 , ID Week 2017 Abstracts
          : S328-S329
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Internal Medicine-Pediatrics, Geisinger , Danville, Pennsylvania
          [2 ] Hospital Medicine, Geisinger , Danville, Pennsylvania
          [3 ] Rheumatology, Geisinger , Danville, Pennsylvania
          [4 ] Infectious Diseases, Geisinger , Danville, Pennsylvania
          Author notes

          Session: 141. Clinical Practice Issues

          Friday, October 6, 2017: 12:30 PM

          Article
          ofx163.777
          10.1093/ofid/ofx163.777
          5632124
          fb0c8a55-1ae8-4182-9b91-d91dc8c221f6
          © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 2
          Categories
          Abstracts
          Poster Abstract

          Comments

          Comment on this article