22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sociodemographic and Pre-Linguistic Factors in Early Vocabulary Acquisition

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Here, we studied the beginnings of language development, jointly assessing two groups of precursors, sociodemographic and pre-linguistic, that have previously been studied separately. Thus, the general objective of this study was to explore which factors best explained the acquisition of initial expressive vocabulary. The sample consisted of 504 participants from Catalan-speaking homes with ages ranging between 10 and 18 months. The data were obtained through the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MCB-CDIs). Vocabulary development shows a lexical spurt at 17 months. Regression analyses show that pre-linguistic factors have more explanatory power of than sociodemographic ones. Within the sociodemographic variables, age, birth order and birth weight explain part of the vocabulary variance. With respect to pre-linguistic variables, imitation, late gestures and phrase comprehension are predictors of the initial vocabulary acquisition. Specifically, imitation and late gestures were the pre-linguistic behaviours that made it possible to distinguish between children with higher and lower levels of vocabulary. We discussed these findings in relation to their relevance for language acquisition and for the early assessment of linguistic competence.

          Related collections

          Most cited references131

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology

          Background Lack of agreement about criteria and terminology for children's language problems affects access to services as well as hindering research and practice. We report the second phase of a study using an online Delphi method to address these issues. In the first phase, we focused on criteria for language disorder. Here we consider terminology. Methods The Delphi method is an iterative process in which an initial set of statements is rated by a panel of experts, who then have the opportunity to view anonymised ratings from other panel members. On this basis they can either revise their views or make a case for their position. The statements are then revised based on panel feedback, and again rated by and commented on by the panel. In this study, feedback from a second round was used to prepare a final set of statements in narrative form. The panel included 57 individuals representing a range of professions and nationalities. Results We achieved at least 78% agreement for 19 of 21 statements within two rounds of ratings. These were collapsed into 12 statements for the final consensus reported here. The term ‘Language Disorder’ is recommended to refer to a profile of difficulties that causes functional impairment in everyday life and is associated with poor prognosis. The term, ‘Developmental Language Disorder’ (DLD) was endorsed for use when the language disorder was not associated with a known biomedical aetiology. It was also agreed that (a) presence of risk factors (neurobiological or environmental) does not preclude a diagnosis of DLD, (b) DLD can co‐occur with other neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g. ADHD) and (c) DLD does not require a mismatch between verbal and nonverbal ability. Conclusions This Delphi exercise highlights reasons for disagreements about terminology for language disorders and proposes standard definitions and nomenclature.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ratcheting up the ratchet: on the evolution of cumulative culture.

            Some researchers have claimed that chimpanzee and human culture rest on homologous cognitive and learning mechanisms. While clearly there are some homologous mechanisms, we argue here that there are some different mechanisms at work as well. Chimpanzee cultural traditions represent behavioural biases of different populations, all within the species' existing cognitive repertoire (what we call the 'zone of latent solutions') that are generated by founder effects, individual learning and mostly product-oriented (rather than process-oriented) copying. Human culture, in contrast, has the distinctive characteristic that it accumulates modifications over time (what we call the 'ratchet effect'). This difference results from the facts that (i) human social learning is more oriented towards process than product and (ii) unique forms of human cooperation lead to active teaching, social motivations for conformity and normative sanctions against non-conformity. Together, these unique processes of social learning and cooperation lead to humans' unique form of cumulative cultural evolution.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Children (Basel)
                Children (Basel)
                children
                Children
                MDPI
                2227-9067
                09 March 2021
                March 2021
                : 8
                : 3
                : 206
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Psychology Department, Universitat de Girona, 17004 Girona, Spain; anna.amado@ 123456udg.edu
                [2 ]Applied Pedagogy and Educational Psychology, Institute of Research and Innovation in Education (IRIE), Universitat de les Illes Balears, 07122 Palma, Spain
                [3 ]Psychology Faculty, Universitat de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; monicasanz@ 123456ub.edu (M.S.-T.); miquel.serra@ 123456ub.edu (M.S.)
                [4 ]Psychology and Education Science Studies, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, 08018 Barcelona, Spain; landreub@ 123456uoc.edu
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: elisabet.serrat@ 123456udg.edu (E.S.-S.); eva.aguilar@ 123456uib.es (E.A.-M.); Tel.: +34-972-418-754 (E.S.-S.); +34-971-172-566 (E.A.-M.)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0702-0082
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0286-6572
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2012-1956
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8568-2511
                Article
                children-08-00206
                10.3390/children8030206
                8001358
                33803169
                fb66e939-14d7-4b1a-8c6a-e0ec0723624a
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 29 December 2020
                : 03 March 2021
                Categories
                Article

                macarthur-bates cdi,catalan,lexical spurt,sex,birth order,birth weight,parental education,imitation,gestures,comprehension

                Comments

                Comment on this article