41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Levels of stigma among community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China

      research-article
      , , ,
      BMC Psychiatry
      BioMed Central
      Stigma, Mental health staff, Psychometric properties

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Stigma and discrimination are widely experienced by people with mental illness, even in healthcare settings. The purposes of this study were to assess mental health stigma among community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China and in doing so also to assess the psychometric properties of the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS) - Chinese version.

          Methods

          A cross-sectional survey was undertaken among 214 community mental health staff in Guangzhou from September to November, 2013. The Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS) and RIBS were administered together with the Mental Illness: Clinicians’ Attitudes Scale (MICA) to evaluate staff stigma from the perspective of knowledge, attitudes and behaviour.

          Results

          The total scores of RIBS, MAKS and MICA were (11.97 ± 3.41), (16.80 ± 5.39) and (51.69 ± 6.94) respectively. Female staff members were more willing to contact people with mental illness than males ( t(212) = −2.85, P = 0.005) and had more knowledge about mental illness ( t(212) = −2.28, P = 0.024). The Chinese version of RIBS had good internal consistency (alpha = 0.82), test-retest reliability ( r = 0.68, P < 0.001) and adequate convergent validity, as indicated by a significant negative correlation with the Chinese version of MICA( r = −0.43 , P < 0.001).

          Conclusions

          Our results show relatively high levels of stigma toward people with mental illness among community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China. There are slightly gender differences in discriminatory behaviours and stigma related knowledge of mental illness among community mental health staff, with female staff in general less stigmatising. Accordingly, anti-stigma programmes should be established among healthcare staff. In addition, the Chinese version of RIBS is a reliable, valid and acceptable measure which can be used to assess the willingness of participants to contact people with mental illness in future anti-stigma campaigns.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mental illness stigma, help seeking, and public health programs.

          Globally, more than 70% of people with mental illness receive no treatment from health care staff. Evidence suggests that factors increasing the likelihood of treatment avoidance or delay before presenting for care include (1) lack of knowledge to identify features of mental illnesses, (2) ignorance about how to access treatment, (3) prejudice against people who have mental illness, and (4) expectation of discrimination against people diagnosed with mental illness. In this article, we reviewed the evidence on whether large-scale anti-stigma campaigns could lead to increased levels of help seeking.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Physical health disparities and mental illness: the scandal of premature mortality.

            A 20-year mortality gap for men, and 15 years for women, is still experienced by people with mental illness in high-income countries. The combination of lifestyle risk factors, higher rates of unnatural deaths and poorer physical healthcare contribute to this scandal of premature mortality that contravenes international conventions for the 'right to health.'
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Development and psychometric properties of the reported and intended behaviour scale (RIBS): a stigma-related behaviour measure.

              Although stigma in relation to mental health has been defined as including components of knowledge, attitudes and behaviour, no psychometrically tested instrument to assess behavioural discrimination at the population level has been developed. This paper presents details of the development and psychometric properties of the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS), an instrument based on the Star Social Distance Scale, to assess reported (past and current) and intended (future) behavioural discrimination among the general public against people with mental health problems. Three studies were carried out to evaluate psychometric properties of the RIBS (Study 1, n = 92; Study 2, n = 37; Study 3, n = 403). Adults aged 25-45 in socio-economic groups: B, C1 and C2 (middle-income groups) took part in development and testing of the RIBS. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability is moderate/substantial. Strong consensus validity was found, as rated by service users/consumers and international experts in stigma research. Use of a behavioural outcome may be important to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions intended to reduce stigma and/or discrimination related to mental illness. The RIBS was found to be a brief, feasible and psychometrically robust measure for assessing mental health-related reported and intended behavioural discrimination.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                biglijie@163.com
                ljpsy87@163.com
                graham.thornicroft@kcl.ac.uk
                yuan2011gz@163.com
                Journal
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-244X
                13 August 2014
                13 August 2014
                2014
                : 14
                : 1
                : 231
                Affiliations
                [ ]Guangzhou Psychiatric Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, 36# Mingxin Road, Liwan, Guangzhou, 510370 China
                [ ]Health Service and Population Research Department, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny, London, SE5 8AF UK
                Article
                231
                10.1186/s12888-014-0231-x
                4149249
                25115221
                fb7551f9-3551-4147-9410-9a27f5a43e83
                © Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 17 January 2014
                : 5 August 2014
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                stigma,mental health staff,psychometric properties
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                stigma, mental health staff, psychometric properties

                Comments

                Comment on this article