47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Treatment of Hypertensive Patients with a Fixed-Dose Combination of Bisoprolol and Amlodipine: Results of a Cohort study with More Than 10,000 Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Many patients need more than one antihypertensive agent for effective blood pressure (BP) control. Prescription of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of bisoprolol and amlodipine in one tablet has been shown to significantly improve patient adherence. This non-interventional study investigated the effects on adherence and BP control of switching from a free-dose combination of the two antihypertensive substances to a FDC in a larger patient population.

          Methods

          Patients aged ≥18 years with essential hypertension were switched at least 4 weeks prior to study initiation from a free-dose combination of bisoprolol and amlodipine to the FDC. Dosage adjustment was implemented only if medically indicated. Adherence was assessed on the basis of the ratio of pills used to pills dispensed (%) at each visit (pill count). BP and key laboratory values were determined at baseline, 3 and 6 months.

          Results

          10,532 patients (average age 59 years; 48% female) were recruited between 2013 and 2014; 22% of patients had type 2 diabetes and 38% had cardiovascular disease. The mean doses of the freely combined drugs prior to switching were 5.5 mg bisoprolol and 6.1 mg amlodipine once daily. The mean daily doses prescribed in the FDC were 5.8 and 6.4 mg, respectively. Pill counts at 6 months revealed a good to excellent adherence in >95% of the patients. Comparison of BP at baseline and at 6 months showed substantial changes (mean systolic BP: 147.3 vs. 130.9 mmHg; mean diastolic BP: 87.9 vs. 79.1 mmHg). Clinically relevant improvement in systolic BP was established for 82% of patients. In patients with comorbidities, switching to FDC produced a substantial improvement in BP. A total of 89 (0.7%) adverse events (AEs) were reported, including edema, headache, dizziness, bradycardia, nausea, and skin reactions. Only three AEs were classified as serious.

          Conclusion

          These data from a non-interventional study in a large patient population demonstrate the benefits of prescribing a FDC of bisoprolol–amlodipine in terms of an excellent adherence and an associated improvement in control of previously elevated BP, which may be relevant in real-life practice.

          Funding

          Merck KGaA.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40119-015-0045-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Factors affecting therapeutic compliance: A review from the patient’s perspective

          Objective To explore and evaluate the most common factors causing therapeutic non-compliance. Methods A qualitative review was undertaken by a literature search of the Medline database from 1970 to 2005 to identify studies evaluating the factors contributing to therapeutic non-compliance. Results A total of 102 articles was retrieved and used in the review from the 2095 articles identified by the literature review process. From the literature review, it would appear that the definition of therapeutic compliance is adequately resolved. The preliminary evaluation revealed a number of factors that contributed to therapeutic non-compliance. These factors could be categorized to patient-centered factors, therapy-related factors, social and economic factors, healthcare system factors, and disease factors. For some of these factors, the impact on compliance was not unequivocal, but for other factors, the impact was inconsistent and contradictory. Conclusion There are numerous studies on therapeutic noncompliance over the years. The factors related to compliance may be better categorized as “soft” and “hard” factors as the approach in countering their effects may differ. The review also highlights that the interaction of the various factors has not been studied systematically. Future studies need to address this interaction issue, as this may be crucial to reducing the level of non-compliance in general, and to enhancing the possibility of achieving the desired healthcare outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Lifetime risks of cardiovascular disease.

            The lifetime risks of cardiovascular disease have not been reported across the age spectrum in black adults and white adults. We conducted a meta-analysis at the individual level using data from 18 cohort studies involving a total of 257,384 black men and women and white men and women whose risk factors for cardiovascular disease were measured at the ages of 45, 55, 65, and 75 years. Blood pressure, cholesterol level, smoking status, and diabetes status were used to stratify participants according to risk factors into five mutually exclusive categories. The remaining lifetime risks of cardiovascular events were estimated for participants in each category at each age, with death free of cardiovascular disease treated as a competing event. We observed marked differences in the lifetime risks of cardiovascular disease across risk-factor strata. Among participants who were 55 years of age, those with an optimal risk-factor profile (total cholesterol level, <180 mg per deciliter [4.7 mmol per liter]; blood pressure, <120 mm Hg systolic and 80 mm Hg diastolic; nonsmoking status; and nondiabetic status) had substantially lower risks of death from cardiovascular disease through the age of 80 years than participants with two or more major risk factors (4.7% vs. 29.6% among men, 6.4% vs. 20.5% among women). Those with an optimal risk-factor profile also had lower lifetime risks of fatal coronary heart disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction (3.6% vs. 37.5% among men, <1% vs. 18.3% among women) and fatal or nonfatal stroke (2.3% vs. 8.3% among men, 5.3% vs. 10.7% among women). Similar trends within risk-factor strata were observed among blacks and whites and across diverse birth cohorts. Differences in risk-factor burden translate into marked differences in the lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease, and these differences are consistent across race and birth cohorts. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Study design, precision, and validity in observational studies.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ulrike.gottwald-hostalek@merckgroup.com
                Journal
                Cardiol Ther
                Cardiol Ther
                Cardiology and Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                2193-8261
                2193-6544
                8 August 2015
                8 August 2015
                December 2015
                : 4
                : 2
                : 179-190
                Affiliations
                [ ]Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
                [ ]Jagiellonion University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
                [ ]Clinical Research, Alsbach, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0770-4743
                Article
                45
                10.1007/s40119-015-0045-z
                4675749
                26253777
                fba17b45-4b1f-4c34-b04a-0a4aaf287fd5
                © The Author(s) 2015
                History
                : 10 July 2015
                Funding
                Funded by: Merck KGaA
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Healthcare 2015

                adherence,amlodipine,bisoprolol,blood pressure control,fixed-dose combination

                Comments

                Comment on this article