313
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective

      1
      Annual Review of Psychology
      Annual Reviews

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The capacity to exercise control over the nature and quality of one's life is the essence of humanness. Human agency is characterized by a number of core features that operate through phenomenal and functional consciousness. These include the temporal extension of agency through intentionality and forethought, self-regulation by self-reactive influence, and self-reflectiveness about one's capabilities, quality of functioning, and the meaning and purpose of one's life pursuits. Personal agency operates within a broad network of sociostructural influences. In these agentic transactions, people are producers as well as products of social systems. Social cognitive theory distinguishes among three modes of agency: direct personal agency, proxy agency that relies on others to act on one's behest to secure desired outcomes, and collective agency exercised through socially coordinative and interdependent effort. Growing transnational embeddedness and interdependence are placing a premium on collective efficacy to exercise control over personal destinies and national life.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Annual Review of Psychology
          Annu. Rev. Psychol.
          Annual Reviews
          0066-4308
          1545-2085
          February 2001
          February 2001
          : 52
          : 1
          : 1-26
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2131; e-mail:
          Article
          10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
          11148297
          fcd35f8b-ef29-413d-8eff-90f6a2d29641
          © 2001
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article