0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      3D Printed Porous Methacrylate/Silica Hybrid Scaffold for Bone Substitution

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Inorganic–organic hybrid biomaterials made with star polymer poly(methyl methacrylate- co-3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate) and silica, which show promising mechanical properties, are 3D printed as bone substitutes for the first time, by direct ink writing of the sol. Three different inorganic:organic ratios of poly(methyl methacrylate- co-3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate)- star-SiO 2 hybrid inks are printed with pore channels in the range of 100-200 μm. Mechanical properties of the 3D printed scaffolds fall within the range of trabecular bone, and MC3T3 pre-osteoblast cells are able to adhere to the scaffolds in vitro, regardless of their compositions. Osteogenic and angiogenic properties of the hybrid scaffolds are shown using a rat calvarial defect model. Hybrid scaffolds with 40:60 inorganic:organic composition are able to instigate new vascularized bone formation within its pore channels and polarize macrophages toward M2 phenotype. 3D printing inorganic-organic hybrids with sophisticated polymer structure opens up possibilities to produce novel bone graft materials.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Bioceramics: From Concept to Clinic

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids.

              Bioactive glasses are reported to be able to stimulate more bone regeneration than other bioactive ceramics but they lag behind other bioactive ceramics in terms of commercial success. Bioactive glass has not yet reached its potential but research activity is growing. This paper reviews the current state of the art, starting with current products and moving onto recent developments. Larry Hench's 45S5 Bioglass® was the first artificial material that was found to form a chemical bond with bone, launching the field of bioactive ceramics. In vivo studies have shown that bioactive glasses bond with bone more rapidly than other bioceramics, and in vitro studies indicate that their osteogenic properties are due to their dissolution products stimulating osteoprogenitor cells at the genetic level. However, calcium phosphates such as tricalcium phosphate and synthetic hydroxyapatite are more widely used in the clinic. Some of the reasons are commercial, but others are due to the scientific limitations of the original Bioglass 45S5. An example is that it is difficult to produce porous bioactive glass templates (scaffolds) for bone regeneration from Bioglass 45S5 because it crystallizes during sintering. Recently, this has been overcome by understanding how the glass composition can be tailored to prevent crystallization. The sintering problems can also be avoided by synthesizing sol-gel glass, where the silica network is assembled at room temperature. Process developments in foaming, solid freeform fabrication and nanofibre spinning have now allowed the production of porous bioactive glass scaffolds from both melt- and sol-gel-derived glasses. An ideal scaffold for bone regeneration would share load with bone. Bioceramics cannot do this when the bone defect is subjected to cyclic loads, as they are brittle. To overcome this, bioactive glass polymer hybrids are being synthesized that have the potential to be tough, with congruent degradation of the bioactive inorganic and the polymer components. Key to this is creating nanoscale interpenetrating networks, the organic and inorganic components of which have covalent coupling between them, which involves careful control of the chemistry of the sol-gel process. Bioactive nanoparticles can also now be synthesized and their fate tracked as they are internalized in cells. This paper reviews the main developments in the field of bioactive glass and its variants, covering the importance of control of hierarchical structure, synthesis, processing and cellular response in the quest for new regenerative synthetic bone grafts. The paper takes the reader from Hench's Bioglass 45S5 to new hybrid materials that have tailorable mechanical properties and degradation rates. Copyright © 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                101581613
                Adv Healthc Mater
                Adv Healthc Mater
                Advanced healthcare materials
                2192-2640
                2192-2659
                05 May 2021
                05 May 2021
                19 May 2021
                11 January 2024
                : 10
                : 12
                : e2100117
                Affiliations
                Department of Materials, Imperial College London London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
                Center for Biomaterials, Biomedical Research Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
                Center for Biomaterials, Biomedical Research Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
                Department of Materials, Imperial College London London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
                Department of Materials Imperial College London London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
                Center for Biomaterials, Biomedical Research Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
                Center for Biomaterials, Biomedical Research Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
                Department of Materials Imperial College London London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
                Department of Materials Imperial College London London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
                Department of Materials Imperial College London London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
                School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
                Center for Biomaterials, Biomedical Research Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
                YU-KIST Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
                Department of Materials Imperial College London London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
                Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
                Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
                Article
                EMS124817
                10.1002/adhm.202100117
                7615494
                33951318
                fd09d54f-ce0b-43ee-be14-e1558f4f8fb4

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                3d printing,biomaterials,bone substitutes,hybrids,sol-gels
                3d printing, biomaterials, bone substitutes, hybrids, sol-gels

                Comments

                Comment on this article