21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Pictilisib for oestrogen receptor-positive, aromatase inhibitor-resistant, advanced or metastatic breast cancer (FERGI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) is a promising approach to overcome resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Pictilisib is an oral inhibitor of multiple PI3K isoforms. The aim of this study is to establish if addition of pictilisib to fulvestrant can improve progression-free survival in oestrogen receptor-positive, endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

          Methods

          In this two-part, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study, we recruited postmenopausal women aged 18 years or older with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer resistant to treatment with an aromatase inhibitor in the adjuvant or metastatic setting, from 123 medical centres across 21 countries. Part 1 included patients with or without PIK3CA mutations, whereas part 2 included only patients with PIK3CA mutations. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1 in part 1 and 2:1 in part 2) via a computer-generated hierarchical randomisation algorithm to daily oral pictilisib (340 mg in part 1 and 260 mg in part 2) or placebo starting on day 15 of cycle 1, plus intramuscular fulvestrant 500 mg on day 1 and day 15 of cycle 1 and day 1 of subsequent cycles in both groups. In part 1, we stratified patients by presence or absence of PIK3CA mutation, primary or secondary aromatase inhibitor resistance, and measurable or non-measurable disease. In part 2, we stratified patients by previous aromatase inhibitor treatment for advanced or metastatic disease or relapse during or within 6 months of an aromatase inhibitor treatment in the adjuvant setting and measurable or non-measurable disease. All patients and those administering treatment and assessing outcomes were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population for both parts 1 and 2 and also separately in patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumours in part 1. Tumour assessment (physical examination and imaging scans) was investigator-assessed and done at screening and after 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks, and 32 weeks of treatment from day 1 of cycle 1 and every 12 weeks thereafter. We assessed safety in as-treated patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01437566.

          Findings

          In part 1, between Sept 27, 2011, and Jan 11, 2013, we randomly allocated 168 patients to the pictilisib (89 [53%]) or placebo (79 [47%]) group. In part 2, between March 18, 2013, and Jan 2, 2014, we randomly allocated 61 patients to the pictilisib (41 [67%]) or placebo (20 [33%]) group. In part 1, we found no difference in median progression-free survival between the pictilisib (6.6 months [95% CI 3.9–9.8]) and placebo (5.1 months [3.6–7.3]) group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74 [95% CI 0.52–1.06]; p=0.096). We also found no difference when patients were analysed according to presence (pictilisib 6.5 months [95% CI 3.7–9.8] vs placebo 5.1 months [2.6–10.4]; HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.42–1.28]; p=0.268) or absence (5.8 months [3.6–11.1] vs 3.6 months [2.8–7.3]; HR 0.72 [0.42–1.23]; p=0.23) of PIK3CA mutation. In part 2, we also found no difference in progression-free survival between groups (5.4 months [95% CI 3.8–8.3] vs 10.0 months [3.6–13.0]; HR 1.07 [95% CI 0.53–2.18]; p=0.84). In part 1, grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 54 (61%) of 89 patients in the pictilisib group and 22 (28%) of 79 in the placebo group. 19 serious adverse events related to pictilisib treatment were reported in 14 (16%) of 89 patients. Only one (1%) of 79 patients reported treatment-related serious adverse events in the placebo group. In part 2, grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 15 (36%) of 42 patients in the pictilisib group and seven (37%) of 19 patients in the placebo group. Four serious adverse events related to pictilisib treatment were reported in two (5%) of 42 patients. One treatment-related serious adverse event occurred in one (5%) of 19 patients in the placebo group.

          Interpretation

          Although addition of pictilisib to fulvestrant did not significantly improve progression-free survival, dosing of pictilisib was limited by toxicity, potentially limiting its efficacy. For future assessment of PI3K inhibition as an approach to overcome resistance to hormonal therapy, inhibitors with greater selectivity than that of pictilisib might be needed to improve tolerability and potentially increase efficacy. No further investigation of pictilisib in this setting is ongoing.

          Funding

          F Hoffmann-La Roche.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          100957246
          27004
          Lancet Oncol
          Lancet Oncol.
          The Lancet. Oncology
          1470-2045
          1474-5488
          17 May 2017
          04 May 2016
          June 2016
          24 July 2017
          : 17
          : 6
          : 811-821
          Affiliations
          Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
          Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
          Peninsula Oncology Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
          Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
          The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
          Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
          Sarah Cannon Research Institute, and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA
          Palacky University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
          University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
          National University Hospital, Singapore
          Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
          Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
          Herlev University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
          Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
          Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
          Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
          Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
          Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
          Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
          Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
          Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
          Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
          Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
          Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
          Author notes
          Correspondence to: Dr Ian E Krop, Dana-Farber, Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA, ian_krop@ 123456dfci.harvard.edu
          Article
          PMC5524539 PMC5524539 5524539 nihpa875794
          10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00106-6
          5524539
          27155741
          fd49ab42-20c0-46f8-b07e-81dbd6cabf8a
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article