19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before September 30, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 3.0 Impact Factor I 5.6 CiteScore I 0.83 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Familiality of Cardiovascular Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A very high rate of cardiovascular (CV) death is well recognized in individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Besides many other factors, this excess risk may also be related to familiality. We tested this hypothesis by estimating the risk of CV death among both ESRD patients and their relatives. In this case-control study, we used the Utah Population Database (UPDB), which includes genealogy records, state-wide death certificates as well as other data sets. These have been linked to the University of Utah Health Sciences Enterprise Data Warehouse which provides multiple diagnosis data sources. Patients with ESRD either on dialysis or who received a kidney transplant were identified in the clinical databases at the University of Utah Dialysis Program and Kidney Transplant Program or from Utah death certificates. CV deaths were identified by the reporting on the death certificates. The relative risks for CV death, adjusted for several potential confounders in the ESRD patients (n = 516) and in their first-degree (n = 2,418) and second-degree (n = 7,720) relatives were estimated in relation to the general population. Using information from death certificates, ESRD patients were found to have disproportionately increased risk for CV mortality (relative risk or RR = 2.4; 95% CI 2.11–2.72), compared to the general population. First-degree relatives of ESRD patients were also found to have an increased CV mortality risk (RR = 1.10; 95% CI 1.01–1.20). When the specific categories of CVD were analyzed, the first-degree relatives also had higher risks for death from acute myocardial infarction (RR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.03–1.40) or heart failure (RR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.12–1.56). An increased risk for CV mortality was, however, not observed in second-degree relatives of ESRD patients, except for the subcategory of hypertensive heart disease (RR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.01–1.49). In conclusion, this study suggests that, in addition to many putative risk factors, the increased risk of CV death in ESRD patients may have a familial contribution.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Predialysis blood pressure and mortality risk in a national sample of maintenance hemodialysis patients

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Usefulness of cardiovascular family history data for population-based preventive medicine and medical research (the Health Family Tree Study and the NHLBI Family Heart Study).

              Detailed medical family history data have been proposed to be effective in identifying high-risk families for targeted intervention. With use of a validated and standardized quantitative family risk score (FRS), the degree of familial aggregation of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, hypertension, and diabetes was obtained from 122,155 Utah families and 6,578 Texas families in the large, population-based Health Family Tree Study, and 1,442 families in the NHLBI Family Heart Study in Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, and Utah. Utah families with a positive family history of CHD (FRS > or =0.5) represented only 14% of the general population but accounted for 72% of persons with early CHD (men before age 55 years, women before age 65 years) and 48% of CHD at all ages. For strokes, 11% of families with FRS > or =0.5 accounted for 86% of early strokes ( 5,000 families sampled each year in Utah for 14 years demonstrated a gradual decrease in the frequency of a strong positive family history of CHD (-26%/decade) and stroke (-15%/decade) that paralleled a decrease in incidence rates (r = 0.86, p <0.001 for CHD; r = 0.66, p <0.01 for stroke). Because of the collaboration of schools, health departments, and medical schools, the Health Family Tree Study proved to be a highly cost-efficient method for identifying 17,064 CHD-prone families and 13,106 stroke-prone families (at a cost of about $27 per high-risk family) in whom well-established preventive measures can be encouraged. We conclude that most early cardiovascular events in a population occur in families with a positive family history of cardiovascular disease. Family history collection is a validated and relatively inexpensive tool for family-based preventive medicine and medical research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                AJN
                Am J Nephrol
                10.1159/issn.0250-8095
                American Journal of Nephrology
                S. Karger AG
                0250-8095
                1421-9670
                2009
                February 2009
                18 September 2008
                : 29
                : 3
                : 237-243
                Affiliations
                aDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, bDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension and cDialysis Program, University of Utah School of Medicine, and dMedical Service, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, Utah, and eDivision of Nephrology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA
                Article
                156721 Am J Nephrol 2009;29:237–243
                10.1159/000156721
                18799871
                fe7541a2-0ce6-42f9-8a18-7a0f405befbc
                © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 04 February 2008
                : 05 May 2008
                Page count
                Tables: 3, References: 21, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Original Report: Patient-Oriented, Translational Research

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                Genealogy,End-stage renal disease,Kidney transplant,Dialysis,Cardiovascular disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article