18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recent Perspectives on the Relations between Fecal Mutagenicity, Genotoxicity, and Diet

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          DNA damage is an essential component of the genesis of colonic cancer. Gut microbial products and food components are thought to be principally responsible for the damage that initiates disease progression. Modified Ames tests and Comet assays have been developed for measuring mutagenicity and genotoxicity. Their relevance to oncogenesis remains to be confirmed, as does the relative importance of different mutagenic and genotoxic compounds present in fecal water and the bacteria involved in their metabolism. Dietary intervention studies provide clues to the likely risks of oncogenesis. High-protein diets lead to increases in N-nitroso compounds in fecal water and greater DNA damage as measured by the Comet assay, for example. Other dietary interventions, such as non-digestible carbohydrates and probiotics, may lead to lower fecal genotoxicity. In order to make recommendations to the general public, we must develop a better understanding of how genotoxic compounds are formed in the colon, how accurate the Ames and Comet assays are, and how diet affects genotoxicity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Meat intake and risk of stomach and esophageal adenocarcinoma within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).

          Dietary factors are thought to have an important role in gastric and esophageal carcinogenesis, but evidence from cohort studies for such a role is lacking. We examined the risks of gastric cancer and esophageal adenocarcinoma associated with meat consumption within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. A total of 521,457 men and women aged 35-70 years in 10 European countries participated in the EPIC cohort. Dietary and lifestyle information was collected at recruitment. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine associations between meat intake and risks of cardia and gastric non-cardia cancers and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Data from a calibration substudy were used to correct hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for diet measurement errors. In a nested case-control study, we examined interactions between Helicobacter pylori infection status (i.e., plasma H. pylori antibodies) and meat intakes. All statistical tests were two-sided. During a mean follow-up of 6.5 years, 330 gastric adenocarcinoma and 65 esophageal adenocarcinomas were diagnosed. Gastric non-cardia cancer risk was statistically significantly associated with intakes of total meat (calibrated HR per 100-g/day increase = 3.52; 95% CI = 1.96 to 6.34), red meat (calibrated HR per 50-g/day increase = 1.73; 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.88), and processed meat (calibrated HR per 50-g/day increase = 2.45; 95% CI = 1.43 to 4.21). The association between the risk of gastric non-cardia cancer and total meat intake was especially large in H. pylori-infected subjects (odds ratio per 100-g/day increase = 5.32; 95% CI = 2.10 to 13.4). Intakes of total, red, or processed meat were not associated with the risk of gastric cardia cancer. A positive but non-statistically significant association was observed between esophageal adenocarcinoma cancer risk and total and processed meat intake in the calibrated model. In this study population, the absolute risk of development of gastric adenocarcinoma within 10 years for a study subject aged 60 years was 0.26% for the lowest quartile of total meat intake and 0.33% for the highest quartile of total meat intake. Total, red, and processed meat intakes were associated with an increased risk of gastric non-cardia cancer, especially in H. pylori antibody-positive subjects, but not with cardia gastric cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Haem, not protein or inorganic iron, is responsible for endogenous intestinal N-nitrosation arising from red meat.

              Many N-nitroso compounds (NOC) are carcinogens. In this controlled study of 21 healthy male volunteers, levels of NOC on a high (420 grams) red meat diet were significantly greater (P = 0.001) than on a low (60 grams) meat diet but not significantly greater when an equivalent amount of vegetable protein was fed. An 8-mg supplement of haem iron also increased fecal NOC (P = 0.006) compared with the low meat diet, but 35-mg ferrous iron had no effect. Endogenous N-nitrosation, arising from ingestion of haem but not inorganic iron or protein, may account for the increased risk associated with red meat consumption in colorectal cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Pharmacol
                Front. Pharmacol.
                Frontiers in Pharmacology
                Frontiers Research Foundation
                1663-9812
                03 March 2011
                2011
                : 2
                : 4
                Affiliations
                [1] 1simpleRowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen, UK
                [2] 2simpleFood and Health Research Centre, University of Eastern Finland Kuopio, Finland
                [3] 3simpleSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Erwin L. Roggen, Novozymes, Denmark

                Reviewed by: Erwin L. Roggen, Novozymes, Denmark; Claus Thagaard Christophersen, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia

                *Correspondence: Silvia W. Gratz, Microbial Biochemistry Group, Rowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, UK. e-mail: s.gratz@ 123456abdn.ac.uk

                This article was submitted to Frontiers in Predictive Toxicity, a specialty of Frontiers in Pharmacology.

                Article
                10.3389/fphar.2011.00004
                3132665
                21779247
                ff684ff6-7326-4163-b2b5-95debe570b0b
                Copyright © 2011 Gratz, Wallace and El-Nezami.

                This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.

                History
                : 31 August 2010
                : 31 January 2011
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 77, Pages: 9, Words: 9394
                Categories
                Pharmacology
                Review Article

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                dna,feces,human,n-nitroso compounds,diet,colon,comet assay,ames test
                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                dna, feces, human, n-nitroso compounds, diet, colon, comet assay, ames test

                Comments

                Comment on this article