34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Expert perspectives on biosimilar monoclonal antibodies in breast cancer

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          While biosimilars of low molecular-weight biologics such as G-CSF have been available in Europe since 2006, biosimilars of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have only become available in the last year. Unlike G-CSF, mAbs are large and complex and often play a direct role in the survival of patients with life-threatening illnesses such as breast cancer. Several biosimilars are currently under development for the treatment of breast cancer, and the use of biosimilars in a setting that directly impacts patient survival raises a number of questions. In this review, we discuss the biosimilar mAbs currently in development for the treatment of breast cancer. We provide an overview of the European Medicine Agency guidelines and historic data on the development of biosimilars in order to discuss the development of biosimilar mAbs for breast cancer. Biosimilars offer a highly attractive path toward reducing the cost of medical care and should be pursued with great interest. However, for agents used to treat life-threatening diseases such as cancer, a cautious approach must be taken to ensure that there is no negative impact on patient care. Clinical trials for biosimilar mAbs must be carried out in an appropriately sensitive patient population using endpoints that can accurately demonstrate both the similarity of the biosimilar and its efficacy in the indication. Due to the abbreviated approval pathway, rigorous pharmacovigilance must be in place once a biosimilar mAb is approved in order to ensure its long-term safety and efficacy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Immune changes in patients with advanced breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy with taxanes

          Besides cytotoxicity, taxanes induce other biological effects, especially in the immune system. Taxanes have demonstrated immunostimulatory effects against neoplasms, supporting the idea that these agents suppress cancer through several mechanisms and not solely through inhibiting cell division. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) and investigate their ability in alterating important immunological parameters in breast cancer patients. Thirty women with advanced breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy were randomly assigned into two groups treated with either single agent Paclitaxel or Docetaxel. Sera from patients before the first and after the last treatment cycle and from normal donors were assayed by ELISA for IL-2, IL-1β, IFN-γ, GM-CSF, IL-6, TNF-α, and PGE2 levels. In these same blood samples, NK and LAK cell activity was tested in the total PBMC population against NK-sensitive K562 tumour targets, respectively, and autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction was tested by 3H-thymidine proliferation assays. All patients in both groups responded to therapy. Significant differences were observed in the following immune parameters between the control group of healthy blood donors and the pretreatment values of both taxane groups; IL-2, GM-CSF, IFN-γ levels and NK and LAK cell cytotoxicity were depressed, whereas TNF-α and IL-6 levels were raised in breast cancer patients before treatment compared to controls. There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups regarding any of the parameters studied. Both drugs led to increases in MLR values, NK and LAK cell cytotoxicity, and IL-6, GM-CSF, IFN-γ levels, and decreases for IL-1, TNF, and PGE2 levels. The percentage of these differences was greater for docetaxel in comparison to paclitaxel (P<0.0001). More specifically, docetaxel demonstrated a more pronounced effect on enhancing MLR, NK, LAK activity and IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-6, and GM-CSF levels, as well as caused more potent reduction in IL-1 and TNF-α levels when compared to paclitaxel. The present study indicates that patients responded to treatment of advanced breast cancer with single-agent paclitaxel or docetaxel leads to an increase in serum IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-6, GM-CSF cytokine levels and enhancement of PBMC NK and LAK cell activity, while they both lead to a decrease of acute phase serum cytokine levels of IL-1 and TNF-α. Moreover, the effects of docetaxel are in all the above parameters more pronounced than those of paclitaxel. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 87, 21–27. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600347 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 Cancer Research UK
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Biosimilars-why terminology matters.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The challenge of biosimilars.

              The purpose of this report was to review issues associated with the introduction of alternative versions of biosimilars used in the oncology setting. Data were obtained by searches of MEDLINE, PubMed, references from relevant English-language articles, and guidelines from the European Medicines Agency. When biosimilars are approved in EU, they will be considered 'comparable' to the reference product, but this does not ensure therapeutic equivalence. Inherent differences between biosimilars may produce dissimilarities in clinical efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. Switching biosimilars should be considered a change in clinical management. Regulatory guidelines have been established for some biosimilar categories but, because of the limited clinical experience with biosimilars at approval, pharmacovigilance programs will be important to establish clinical databases. Guidelines also provide a mechanism for the extrapolation of clinical indications (approved indications for which the biosimilar has not been studied). This may be of concern where differences in biological activity can result in adverse outcomes or when safety is paramount (e.g. stem cell mobilization in healthy donors). These issues should be addressed in biosimilar labeling. Biosimilars should provide cost savings and greater accessibility to biopharmaceuticals. A thorough knowledge surrounding biosimilars will ensure the appropriate use of biopharmaceuticals.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                34-93-274-6085 , 34-93-274-6059 , jacortes@vhio.net
                Journal
                Breast Cancer Res Treat
                Breast Cancer Res. Treat
                Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
                Springer US (Boston )
                0167-6806
                1573-7217
                23 February 2014
                23 February 2014
                2014
                : 144
                : 233-239
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Oncology, Vall D’Hebron University Hospital, Paseo Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
                [ ]Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
                [ ]Department of Clinical Research, Curie Institute, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75248 Paris, France
                Article
                2879
                10.1007/s10549-014-2879-9
                3949011
                24562824
                fffbdaa4-1c2d-4ccb-97ef-9b8ab8d0f079
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

                History
                : 29 January 2014
                : 10 February 2014
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                biosimilar antibody,trastuzumab,herceptin®,breast cancer,ct-p6,extrapolation
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                biosimilar antibody, trastuzumab, herceptin®, breast cancer, ct-p6, extrapolation

                Comments

                Comment on this article