+1 Recommend
1 collections

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Putting the individual in context: paths, capitals and topologies of learning

      Pluto Journals


            James Faulconbridge is Professor of Transnational Management at Lancaster University. His research focuses upon the globalisation of professional service firms. Recent articles have examined the nature of stretched communities of learning in such firms, and institutional effects on globalising firms. He is co-author of The Globalisation of Advertising and editor of International Business Travel in the Global Economy.


            Author and article information

            Pluto Journals
            1 March 2014
            : 32
            : 1 ( doiID: 10.1080/prometheus.32.issue-1 )
            : 75-82
            Department of Organisation, Work and Technology, Management School, Lancaster University, UK
            © 2014 Pluto Journals

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            Custom metadata

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics


            1. Amin, A. (2002) ‘Spatialities of globalization’, Environment and Planning A, 34, pp.385–99.

            2. Amin, A. and Cohendet, P. (2004) Architectures of Knowledge: Firms Capabilities and Communities, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

            3. Amin, A. and Roberts, J. (2008) ‘Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice’, Research Policy, 37, pp.353–69.

            4. Asheim, B., Coenen, L. and Vang, J. (2007) ‘Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: socio-spatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, pp.655–70.

            5. Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice, Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.

            6. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990) ‘Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, pp.128–52.

            7. Faulconbridge, J. (2006) ‘Stretching tacit knowledge beyond a local fix? Global spaces of learning in advertising professional service firms’, Journal of Economic Geography, 6, pp.517–40.

            8. Faulconbridge, J. (2007a) ‘Exploring the role of professional associations in collective learning in London and New York's advertising and law professional service firm clusters’, Environment and Planning A, 39, pp.965–84.

            9. Faulconbridge, J. (2007b) ‘London and New York's advertising and law clusters and their networks of learning: relational methodologies and scalar reflections’, Urban Studies, 44, pp.1635–56.

            10. Faulconbridge, J. (2007c) ‘Relational spaces of knowledge production in transnational law firms’, Geoforum, 38, pp.925–10.

            11. Faulconbridge, J. (2010) ‘Global architects: learning and innovation through communities and constellations of practice’, Environment and Planning A, 42, pp.2842–58.

            12. Faulconbridge, J., Muzio, D. and Cook, A. (2012) ‘Institutional legacies in TNCs and their management through training academies: the case of transnational law firms in Italy’, Global Networks, 12, pp.48–70.

            13. Gertler, M. (2008) ‘Buzz without being there? Communities of practice in context’ in Amin, A. and Roberts, J. (eds) Community, Economic Creativity and Organization, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

            14. Gherardi, S. (2009) ‘Practice? It's a matter of taste!‘, Management Learning, 40, p.535.

            15. Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2006) Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning, Blackwell, Oxford.

            16. Granovetter, M. (1973) ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 78, p. 1360.

            17. Granovetter, M. (1985) ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp.481–510.

            18. Howells, J. (2012) ‘The geography of knowledge: never so close but never so far apart’, Journal of Economic Geography, 12, pp.1003–20.

            19. Ibert, O. (2007) ‘Towards a geography of knowledge creation: the ambivalences between “knowledge as an object” and “knowing in practice”‘, Regional Studies, 41, pp.103–14.

            20. Ibert, O. (2010) ‘Relational distance: sociocultural and time-spatial tensions in innovation practices’, Environment and Planning A, 42, p.187.

            21. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

            22. Morgan, K. (2004) ‘The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems’, Journal of Economic Geography, 4, pp.3–21.

            23. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

            24. Nooteboom, B. (2000) Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

            25. Polanyi, M. (1967) The Tacit Dimension, University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL.

            26. Power, D. and Jansson, J. (2008) ‘Cyclical clusters in global circuits: overlapping spaces in furniture trade fairs’, Economic Geography, 84, pp.423–48.

            27. Pred, A. (1977) ‘The choreography of existence: comments on Hagerstrand's time geography and its usefulness’, Economic Geography, 53, pp.207–21.

            28. Pred, A. (1981) ‘Social reproduction and the time-geography of everyday life’, Geografiska Annaler, 63, pp.5–22.

            29. Pred, A. (1983) ‘Structuration and place: on the becoming of sense of place and structure of feeling’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 13, pp.45–68.

            30. Reagans, R. and McEvily, B. (2003) ‘Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effect of cohesion and range’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 2, pp.240–67.

            31. Reckwitz, A. (2002) ‘Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5, pp.243–63.

            32. Rutten, R. (2014) ‘Learning in socio-spatial context: an individual perspective’, Prometheus, 32, 1,pp.67–74.

            33. Shove, E. (2003) Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality, Berg, Oxford.

            34. Storper, M. and Venables, A. (2004) ‘Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy’, Journal of Economic Geography, 4, pp.351–70.

            35. Strati, A. (2007) ‘Sensible knowledge and practice-based learning’, Management Learning, 38, pp.61–77.

            36. Torre, A. (2008) ‘On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission’, Regional Studies, 42, pp.869–89.

            37. Vallance, P. (2011) ‘Relational and dialectical spaces of knowing: knowledge, practice, and work in economic geography’, Environment and Planning A, 43, pp.1098–117.

            38. Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning Meaning and Identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.


            Comment on this article