107
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Prometheus is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      INFORMATION DIFFUSION: RECONCILING SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND PUBLIC POLICY

      Published
      research-article
      Prometheus
      Pluto Journals
      Policy, public policy-making, information diffusion, problem identification, risk analysis.
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This paper is concerned with the policy-making processes and the nature of the information available to those who participate in them. At a very simple level of concern is the issue of how to define what is a risk to which governments should pay attention in the public interest. For those responsible for making policy decisions there are real dilemmas. The policy process itself is inadequate to deal with the processing of scientific information about risk. A representative parliamentary system is notoriously ill-equipped to cope with a multiplicity of information sources. The question of which particular scientific voice should be regarded as legitimate is problematic. There is no single institutional centre to identify particular problems. It is this latter question that creates the most difficulty for policymakers since they need to base their justification of policy on the most valid of grounds. In the past objective scientific fact has been so regarded. Today there are as many different scientific opinions as there are advisers. Problems are defined and redefined depending on the control of the agenda at any one point in time. Some suggestions are made about how these dilemmas might be addressed.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            cpro20
            CPRO
            Prometheus
            Critical Studies in Innovation
            Pluto Journals
            0810-9028
            1470-1030
            December 1990
            : 8
            : 2
            : 240-256
            Affiliations
            Article
            8629475 Prometheus, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1990: pp. 240–256
            10.1080/08109029008629475
            64739269-ca54-42bc-aedb-c93a4810d57f
            Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, References: 42, Pages: 17
            Categories
            Original Articles

            Computer science,Arts,Social & Behavioral Sciences,Law,History,Economics
            Policy,public policy-making,risk analysis.,information diffusion,problem identification

            NOTES AND REFERENCES

            1. Geoffrey Vickers. . 1970. . Freedom in a Rocking Boat . , p. 97––102. . Harmondsworth , London : : Penguin Books. .

            2. Ian Lowe. . 1989. . “The political role of energy forecasting mythology. ”. In Environmental Politics in Australia and New Zealand . , Edited by: Peter Hay, Robyn Eckersley and Geoff Holloway. . p. 33 Hobart : : Centre for Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania. .

            3. Jordan A. G.. 1981. . Iron triangles woolly corporatism and elastic nets. . Journal of Public Policy . , Vol. 1((1)): 95––123. .

            4. Mark Sagoff. . 1988. . The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law and Environment . , Cambridge , Mass. : : Cambridge University Press. .

            5. Mary Douglas and Aaron Wildavsky. . 1982. . Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers . , p. 16 Berkeley , California : : University of California Press. .

            6. ibid., p. 53.

            7. Robert M. Hollingworth, ‘Pesticides: dilemma for consumers’, Chemical and Engineering News, 8 May 1989, p. 35.

            8. S.L.S. Dombrowski, ‘Of mice and men: the effect of science on regulations’, Chemical Engineering Progress, December 1988, p. 35.

            9. Douglas and Wildavsky, op. cit., p. 24.

            10. Hollingworth, op. cit., p. 36.

            11. Dombrowski, op. cit., p. 36.

            12. Martin Seigel, ‘Explaining the risk to the public’, Chemical Engineering Progress, May 1989, p. 2.

            13. Sagoff, op. cit., p. 162.

            14. ibid.

            15. Peter House and Roger Shull. . 1988. . Rush to Policy: Using Analytic Techniques in Public Sector Decision Making . , p. 12 New Brunswick : : Transaction Books. .

            16. Lowe, op. cit., p. 40.

            17. C. Hohenemser, M. Deicher, A. Ernst, H. Hofsass, G. Lindner, and E. Recknagel, ‘Chernobyl’, Chemtech, October 1986, pp. 596–605.

            18. ibid, p. 604.

            19. ibid., p. 599

            20. ibid., p. 603.

            21. House and Shull, op. cit., pp. 16–17.

            22. Douglas and Wildavsky, op. cit., p. 61.

            23. House and Shull, op. cit., p. 19.

            24. Hohenemser et al. op. cit., p. 20.

            25. House and Shull, op. cit., p. 20.

            26. Douglas and Wildavsky, op. cit., p. 10.

            27. Brian Wynn. . 1988. . Risk Management and Hazardous Waste: Implementation and the Dialectics of Vulnerability . , p. 358 Berlin : : Springer-Verlag. .

            28. ibid.

            29. House and Shull, op. cit., p. 159.

            30. John Elster. . 1983. . Explaining Technical Change . , p. 189 Cambridge : : Cambridge University Press. .

            31. Eric Magnusson and Ben Selinger, ‘Inference charts and expert evidence’, paper prepared for the Law Foundation of New South Wales, 1989.

            32. Charles Jones O.. 1984. . An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy . , 3rd ed. , Monterey , California : : Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. .

            33. Sagoff, op. cit., p. 97.

            34. Douglas and Wildavsky, op. cit., pp. 707–3.

            35. Wynne, op. cit., p. 347.

            36. Wynne, op. cit., p. 389.

            37. House and Shull, op. cit., p. 193.

            38. Douglas Macrae, ‘Social science and policy advice’, paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, 1989; see also D. Macrae, ‘Professional knowledge for policy discourse: argumentation vs. reasoned selection of proposals’, Knowledge in Society, 1, 3, Fall 1988, pp. 6–24.

            39. Douglas and Wildavsky, op. cit., Chap. 2; see also Wynne, op. cit., p. 390.

            40. Siegel, op. cit., also for another perspective on these issues which seem of particular concern to chemical engineers, John O. Mingle, ‘Inchemacy: an ethical challenge for chemical engineers’, Chemical Engineering Progress, August 1989, pp. 19–25.

            41. House and Shull, op. cit., p. 210.

            42. Vickers, op. cit., p. 140.

            Comments

            Comment on this article